You can’t fix broken systems, but you can fix how you grade and what kids actually learn from it.
Decide first what you can live with. If you’re forced to inflate, be transparent with yourself: note how many marks were moderated and why, and keep your original marks saved. You can push for fairness by using clear rubrics, anchor papers, and written policies so any changes look obviously artificial. When questioned, speak in systems-language: “We agreed this scheme before the exam,” or “If we change it now, we’ll have to redo for all sections.” You may not win every battle, but you can protect your own integrity and send honest signals to students in your day-to-day feedback, even if final numbers get massaged at the top.
Feedback is only worth the effort if it actually changes what students do next. Long paragraphs in red nobody reads are a waste. Shift to short, concrete next steps (“revise formula sheet daily”, “underline key words first”) and build in a tiny routine where they must respond—correct their mistakes, rewrite one answer, or sign and show a parent. Use class-level feedback sheets instead of repeating the same line 40 times. When parents come, point to specific comments and show how marks improved or didn’t. Over time, a few families notice the difference. You won’t convert everyone, but you will rescue the ones who were ready to listen.
You can’t give personalised, detailed feedback to 50 kids on every task without burning out. Instead, choose your battles. For routine work, use codes, stamps, or a simple tick system and one shared feedback sheet for the whole class. For one or two major tasks a term, slow down and give richer comments, at least to a sample of students across levels. Use peer and self-assessment with clear checklists to share the load. Aim for feedback that is small but actionable, not fancy. If your system lets you sleep at night and at least some students are changing how they study, that’s a win in our reality.