The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Fix the compilation errors in the feature branch so I can open a PR before lunch. Compile the…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Fix the compilation errors in the feature branch so I can open a PR before lunch. Compile the branch, resolve all missing headers and type errors, ensure it builds with the project's warning level as errors, and run a quick smoke test of the affected feature.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I push the corrected branch to the team, make the diff easy to review: consolidate trivial…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I push the corrected branch to the team, make the diff easy to review: consolidate trivial fixes (namespace or include order) into one commit, explain any API changes in the commit message, and flag any places where I had to weaken a const or change a template instantiation so reviewers know the risky spots.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I refactored a class template and now compilation throws a cascade of template instantiation errors…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Multiple template instantiation errors after refactor
I refactored a class template and now compilation throws a cascade of template instantiation errors in unrelated files. I need to open a PR but I can't tell if my change exposed real API breakage or a misuse elsewhere. The reviewer is strict about ABI stability. What's the likely diagnosis and the minimal corrective step that preserves behavior while keeping the CI green?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Whenever I do cross-module refactors, CI blows up with type and template errors and I spend days…
Become — change the pattern
+Compilation errors spike after refactors
Whenever I do cross-module refactors, CI blows up with type and template errors and I spend days fixing fallout. It slows feature delivery and makes the team reluctant to improve code. Which habitual change in how I refactor or prepare branches would prevent these widespread compilation regressions?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other programming language work people do in C++.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.