The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+I started a rebase to tidy commits and now want to abort it — return my branch to exactly how it…
Execute — do the immediate task
+I started a rebase to tidy commits and now want to abort it — return my branch to exactly how it was before I began the rebase, discard any in-progress conflict resolutions, and leave my working tree unchanged if possible. Abort the rebase and confirm the branch pointer matches the pre-rebase commit and that no temporary rebase state remains.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I abort, surface what aborting will discard and what it will keep. Show which commits from…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I abort, surface what aborting will discard and what it will keep. Show which commits from the in-progress rebase are already applied, which conflict resolutions are staged but not committed, and whether aborting will lose any local edits I care about. If abort would lose work, recommend a minimal safe stash or patch sequence instead.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I started rebasing feature/cleanup onto develop, encountered conflicts, and have resolved some…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I ran git rebase and hit conflicts; I'm mid-rebase and worried about losing hand-resolved hunks.
I started rebasing feature/cleanup onto develop, encountered conflicts, and have resolved some hunks but not finished. I can't finish this rebase right now and worry that aborting will discard my partially resolved conflict fixes. I don't know whether those fixes are saved in the index or only in working files. What's the safest next step to preserve my work and return to a clean branch state?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Team members often begin interactive rebases to tidy history, then abort halfway and re-run later,…
Become — change the pattern
+Developers repeatedly start rebases and then abort, losing time.
Team members often begin interactive rebases to tidy history, then abort halfway and re-run later, creating duplicate work and confusion. Where is training or workflow slipping, and what single rule or checklist would reduce aborted rebases and preserve developer time?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other version control work people do in Git.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.