The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need to confirm what changed between commit 9f3c2b and 2a7e1d on branch hotfix/payment. Show a…
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need to confirm what changed between commit 9f3c2b and 2a7e1d on branch hotfix/payment. Show a unified diff of code and a file-level summary of added, removed, and modified files, and save the diff to diffs/payment-hotfix-9f3c2b-2a7e1d.patch.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I send this diff to the payment engineer, make it easy to assess risk: produce a per-file…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I send this diff to the payment engineer, make it easy to assess risk: produce a per-file summary with function-level hunks, flag any changes to public APIs or DB schema, show which tests cover altered files, and annotate lines that remove error handling or change auth checks.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+On hotfix/payment I have commits 9f3c2b (before) and 2a7e1d (after). I’m worried the regression…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+A customer reported a regression after a hotfix; I need to see what changed between two commits.
On hotfix/payment I have commits 9f3c2b (before) and 2a7e1d (after). I’m worried the regression came from an underestimated change. What’s the fastest way to get a clear, file-by-file diff that highlights behavioral changes and potential API or security impacts so I can point the engineer to the suspicious hunks?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+I spend too much time debugging regressions because I run diffs in panic and miss the risky…
Become — change the pattern
+I keep chasing regressions because diffs are hard to interpret under pressure.
I spend too much time debugging regressions because I run diffs in panic and miss the risky changes. What reproducible habit or small tooling setup can I adopt so diffs between commits surface likely causes quickly (API changes, removed checks, schema edits) and I can triage regressions in under twenty minutes?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other version control work people do in Git.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.