Verify signed commits

Verify signed commits in Git — with the four heights of help laid out: do it now, make it easier for the next person to accept, work out the right move when you are stuck, and learn the pattern so it stops coming back.

4prompt heights
Open it in the interactive atlas →

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
Verify that commits on release branch v2.4 are signed and that signatures are valid. Run the…
Verify that commits on release branch v2.4 are signed and that signatures are valid. Run the verification on the last 50 commits, list any commits without a valid signature, and produce a short report naming the commit SHA, author, and why it failed (unsigned, bad key, or untrusted key). For any failures, recommend whether to re-sign, replace, or accept unsigned history.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I send this verification report to the release manager, make it easy for them to approve:…
Before I send this verification report to the release manager, make it easy for them to approve: surface the total signed percentage up top, put the three problematic commits with highest user impact first, and flag whether failures are because of untrusted keys or missing signatures. Suggest remediation options and estimate the disruption of each option.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I ran a verification over the release branch and found five commits that fail signature…

A release manager asked whether every commit is signed; I ran a quick check and saw a handful fail verification.

I ran a verification over the release branch and found five commits that fail signature verification. I do not know whether the failures are due to missing signatures, expired keys, or our key not being trusted in the project's keyring, and I cannot fix all of them before the release window closes. What's the most likely cause and the best immediate remediation to keep the release moving while preserving auditability?

Become — change the pattern

+
We keep shipping releases where most commits are signed but a few fail verification, and later we…

We repeatedly ship releases with a small tail of unverified commits and later redo histories.

We keep shipping releases where most commits are signed but a few fail verification, and later we rework history to fix them. What regular habit and tooling change would stop this rework and keep a clean verified commit list for releases? Propose an automated verification step in CI and a policy for handling a small number of unverifiable commits during release.

Next to this one

Other version control work people do in Git.

Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.