The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+The feature branch and main both have conflicting changes to the API client. Resolve the merge…
Execute — do the immediate task
+The feature branch and main both have conflicting changes to the API client. Resolve the merge conflicts, run the unit tests, and push the merged branch so CI can rerun. Start by confirming no behavior regression in the client and that the public method signatures are unchanged before pushing.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I merge this branch into main, make the conflict resolution obvious to a reviewer: show a…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I merge this branch into main, make the conflict resolution obvious to a reviewer: show a short summary at the top describing which file sections I changed and why, highlight any behavioral changes to the API client, and list the handful of tests I ran locally with their results.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I pulled the feature branch and main; there are merge markers in src/client.js, src/auth.js, and…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I pulled the branch into local and now get merge markers in three files
I pulled the feature branch and main; there are merge markers in src/client.js, src/auth.js, and README.md. I am unsure whether to keep the client method renaming in client.js or the older name in main because both have downstream callers. I can run the test suite but the integration tests take 20 minutes. What is the likely safe choice and the best next step to be confident before pushing?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+We keep losing time resolving the same API surface conflicts between feature branches and main,…
Become — change the pattern
+Repeatedly spending hours reconciling the same conflicts around API changes
We keep losing time resolving the same API surface conflicts between feature branches and main, often with different people renaming methods or changing call signatures. Where should we change our habits: branch strategy, review checklist, or API ownership, so this happens less and reviewers trust merges? Recommend the single most impactful habit to adopt and one practical rule to enforce in PRs.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other code hosting work people do in GitHub.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.