Perform security scans

Run the full security scan suite against the web tier scheduled for tomorrow and deliver a remediation ticket list to the security board by 10:00. Use the scanner profile high-checks on host web-01, include CVE severity and exploitable flags, and verify that false positives are suppressed for the legacy SSO component before you publish.

Before I hand the scan report to compliance, make it easy to act on. Put the top five exploitable CVEs with their impact on the login flow at the top, make remediation steps for each vulnerability concise and owner-assigned, and flag anything that would require a change-window or client notification.

The nightly scanner reported dozens of low-confidence vulnerabilities on web-02 that we don't see in staging. I'm the on-call engineer, the site reliability lead is Hannah, and we have a compliance audit next week. I'm worried reporting them verbatim will trigger an unnecessary incident and waste remediation time, but suppressing them might miss a real problem. I don't know whether these are scanner configuration issues or real drift. What's the most likely cause and the recommended immediate action?

Across multiple audits we keep spending developer time chasing low-confidence scanner findings that never pan out. I'm responsible for the scan program, the engineering managers rotate ownership, and we use two different scanner tools. I think the problem is noisy rules and lack of triage but I'm unsure which policy change will reduce waste. What specific habit should we introduce to cut false-positive remediation time by half?