The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Update the reference list and attached source notes for the contract draft, add the two missing…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Update the reference list and attached source notes for the contract draft, add the two missing journal articles that Priya emailed, ensure each citation uses the firm’s Bluebook variant, then run through the bibliography to fix any author-date mismatches before I submit to Marcus on Friday.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I hand this manuscript to the peer reviewer, make the references easy to check: surface the…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I hand this manuscript to the peer reviewer, make the references easy to check: surface the three items that changed since the last draft at the top of the reference section, mark which sources are primary vs secondary, and flag any references that lack page numbers or DOIs so a reviewer won’t get stuck verifying them.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Marcus asked me to include his two 2023 papers in the literature review, but I’m not sure if he…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I just realized two recent citations Marcus asked for are missing from the reference list
Marcus asked me to include his two 2023 papers in the literature review, but I’m not sure if he meant the conference version or the journal revision. I don’t want to add the wrong entry and cause a reviewer email chain. Which is the likeliest interpretation and what exact next step clears this up with minimal back-and-forth?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Every submission cycle I lose time chasing inconsistent author names, missing DOIs, and duplicate…
Become — change the pattern
+I keep fixing the same citation errors across drafts
Every submission cycle I lose time chasing inconsistent author names, missing DOIs, and duplicate entries across the manuscript and its separate reference file. What habit change or checklist will stop those recurring fixes so I can hand off clean references to reviewers and Marcus without another round of edits?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other word processor work people do in Microsoft Word.
Maintain accurate student recordsMaintain laboratory equipmentMake recommendations to control or eliminate unsafe conditions at workplaces or public facilities.Manage classroom behavior and disciplineManage livestock and dairy operationsMicrosoft WordMulch landscapesNegotiate contracts with service providersNegotiate with other partiesObserve animal reactions and stress signals
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.