Interpret survey results

Interpret survey results — real work, not an imagined feature: named inside 5 evidenced career tasks. Below are four ready AI prompts for it, one per height of help: do it, make it easier to accept, decide when you are stuck, and change the pattern for good.

5career tasks name it
4prompt heights

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
I have raw survey responses from 1,240 employees about remote work preferences and productivity.…
I have raw survey responses from 1,240 employees about remote work preferences and productivity. Send the cleaned summary to Maria in People Ops and Sam the head of analytics for review, with a Friday 5pm deadline. Before sending, check that demographics are normalized, open-text themes are grouped consistently, and the top three actionable insights are one-line items at the top.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I share this survey report with People Ops, make it easy for Maria to decide policy: surface…
Before I share this survey report with People Ops, make it easy for Maria to decide policy: surface the percent preferring hybrid and the top productivity drivers on page one, make the confidence intervals for each segment findable, and flag any sample bias or low-response groups that would make a reviewer hesitate.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I compared this quarter's leadership responses to last year's and leadership now prefers more…

I ran the initial cross-tabs and the leadership segment flipped compared with last year

I compared this quarter's leadership responses to last year's and leadership now prefers more in-office time; Maria will push back because headcount changes could be blamed. I don't know if the change is real or from a different sample frame. What's the most likely cause and the fastest way to confirm before I escalate?

Become — change the pattern

+
Across many surveys we waste hours recoding free-text, reconciling inconsistent demographic labels,…

We keep redoing the same manual recoding of open-text comments

Across many surveys we waste hours recoding free-text, reconciling inconsistent demographic labels, and rebuilding the same pivot tables. Recommend one new habit that would stop this churn and save our analysts and Maria at least half their weekly cleanup time.

Where the evidence lives

Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.

Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.