◆ JavaScript

Optimize website content for search engines

This is real work, not a feature someone invented — it comes from real job ads and real questions people asked. Below are four ready AI prompts: get it done, make it easy for the next person to say yes to, work out the right move when you are stuck, and stop it coming back.

4prompts

The same task, four prompts

today's deadline · the next reviewer · the stuck moment · the pattern
AExecute — do the immediate taskWrite a script that extracts all H1 and H2 tags from the 'product_page.html' file and outputs…+
Write a script that extracts all H1 and H2 tags from the 'product_page.html' file and outputs their text content to a plain text file.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
BImprove — make it easier to acceptBefore I hand this off to the marketing team, improve the SEO content optimization script. For…+
Before I hand this off to the marketing team, improve the SEO content optimization script. For 'product_page.html', analyze the frequency of keywords from our target list within the H1, H2, and paragraph tags. Suggest improvements where keywords are underrepresented or overused.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
CDecide — diagnose the stuck momentThe SEO script is flagging 'premium cloud storage' as underrepresented on our…+
The SEO script is flagging critical keywords as 'underrepresented' on a top-ranking page.
The SEO script is flagging 'premium cloud storage' as underrepresented on our highest-converting product page, but our analytics show it's already ranking #1 for that term. I'm afraid if I push changes based on this, we could lose our ranking, and I can't tell the marketing director the script is wrong without proof. Is this a flaw in my script's keyword density calculation, or could there be a nuance I'm missing about how search engines interpret content? What's the best next step to validate the script's findings without risking our current SEO performance?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
DBecome — change the patternMy content analysis tools frequently provide conflicting or misleading advice regarding keyword…+
My content analysis tools often give conflicting or misleading advice.
My content analysis tools frequently provide conflicting or misleading advice regarding keyword optimization, making it hard to trust their recommendations. This leads to indecision and slow content updates. What habit should I change in how I design and interpret these tools to ensure they provide consistently accurate and actionable insights for our SEO strategy?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?

Questions people actually ask

honest answers, no sign-up

Every task here was seen in the real world. Someone doing the job named it, a real job ad asked for it, or a lot of people asked about it online.

If nothing real showed a task, it is not on the page. That is the whole rule.

They are the same job approached four ways, because what you need depends on where you are.

Get it done today. Make it easy for the next person to say yes to. Work out the right move when you are stuck. Learn the pattern so the job stops coming back.

For most of these jobs it can carry the heavy thinking - draft it, sort it, check it, rehearse it with you.

It cannot sit in your chair, take the blame when a number is wrong, or notice what nobody wrote down. Let it do the first 80%. Keep the last 20% that is truly yours.

No. Copy any prompt and paste it into the AI you already use. No account, no score, no wall in the way.

Any of them. The prompts describe the work rather than naming a product, so they are not tied to one assistant.

That is also why they keep working when you switch.

Change it freely. Every prompt is a starting line, not a rule.

Put in your real numbers, your real names and your real deadline. The more you make it yours, the better the answer comes back.

The tasks come from real job ads, published job data and the questions people ask in public forums.

The steps come from JavaScript's own documentation, with practitioner sources for the traps the manual does not mention.

Push once. Ask it to sharpen the weakest part and to say what it assumed.

Most wrong answers come from a missing detail rather than a bad prompt - tell it the thing it could not know.