◆ LinkedIn

Perform bulk actions on jobs

This is real work, not a feature someone invented — it comes from real job ads and real questions people asked. Below are four ready AI prompts: get it done, make it easy for the next person to say yes to, work out the right move when you are stuck, and stop it coming back.

4prompts

The same task, four prompts

today's deadline · the next reviewer · the stuck moment · the pattern
AExecute — do the immediate taskSend a rejection message to all 75 applicants for the Senior Product Manager role by end of…+
Send a rejection message to all 75 applicants for the Senior Product Manager role by end of day, using the standard template.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
BImprove — make it easier to acceptI need to reject the remaining 75 candidates for the Senior Product Manager role. Draft a…+
I need to reject the remaining 75 candidates for the Senior Product Manager role. Draft a sensitive but clear message that maintains our employer brand, and then send it to them all at once.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
CDecide — diagnose the stuck momentI have 75 candidates to reject for the Senior Product Manager role, and I'm using the standard…+
I'm about to reject 75 candidates, but I'm worried about the impact on our reputation.
I have 75 candidates to reject for the Senior Product Manager role, and I'm using the standard template. I'm afraid that a generic rejection will leave a bad taste, especially for those who made it to the second round. I can't personalize each one. What's the best way to deliver this news in bulk without damaging our employer brand, and what should I prioritize in the message?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
DBecome — change the patternI constantly have to reject large groups of candidates, and it always feels like a cold,…+
Rejecting candidates always feels impersonal and risks our employer brand.
I constantly have to reject large groups of candidates, and it always feels like a cold, impersonal process that could damage our reputation. I want to be efficient, but not at the cost of how people perceive us. What habit should I change in how I approach bulk rejections to make them more humane and less damaging to our employer brand?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?

Questions people actually ask

honest answers, no sign-up

Every task here was seen in the real world. Someone doing the job named it, a real job ad asked for it, or a lot of people asked about it online.

If nothing real showed a task, it is not on the page. That is the whole rule.

They are the same job approached four ways, because what you need depends on where you are.

Get it done today. Make it easy for the next person to say yes to. Work out the right move when you are stuck. Learn the pattern so the job stops coming back.

For most of these jobs it can carry the heavy thinking - draft it, sort it, check it, rehearse it with you.

It cannot sit in your chair, take the blame when a number is wrong, or notice what nobody wrote down. Let it do the first 80%. Keep the last 20% that is truly yours.

No. Copy any prompt and paste it into the AI you already use. No account, no score, no wall in the way.

Any of them. The prompts describe the work rather than naming a product, so they are not tied to one assistant.

That is also why they keep working when you switch.

Change it freely. Every prompt is a starting line, not a rule.

Put in your real numbers, your real names and your real deadline. The more you make it yours, the better the answer comes back.

The tasks come from real job ads, published job data and the questions people ask in public forums.

The steps come from LinkedIn's own documentation, with practitioner sources for the traps the manual does not mention.

Push once. Ask it to sharpen the weakest part and to say what it assumed.

Most wrong answers come from a missing detail rather than a bad prompt - tell it the thing it could not know.