◆ LinkedIn

Post in a group

This is real work, not a feature someone invented — it comes from real job ads and real questions people asked. Below are four ready AI prompts: get it done, make it easy for the next person to say yes to, work out the right move when you are stuck, and stop it coming back.

4prompts
See the prompt↓All LinkedIn tasks

The same task, four prompts

today's deadline · the next reviewer · the stuck moment · the pattern
AExecute — do the immediate taskPost in the Growth Marketing Leaders group as Priya Shah. Share a 250-word post about a…+
Post in the Growth Marketing Leaders group as Priya Shah. Share a 250-word post about a playbook that cut our paid CAC by 23% in 60 days. Start with the saving headline, include two quick steps people can reuse, tag three mutual connections—Tom Rivera, Lian Zhou, and Mark Ellis—and end with one clear ask: who wants a short call to see if it applies. Post now and set comments to visible so I can reply live during the midday peak.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
BImprove — make it easier to acceptBefore I post in the group, make it frictionless for members to engage: surface the 23% saving…+
Before I post in the group, make it frictionless for members to engage: surface the 23% saving in the first sentence; make the two steps bullet-style and actionable; remove any sentence that reads like a sales pitch; add a one-line credibility hook mentioning a case study with numbers; and craft a one-sentence call-to-action that asks for beta testers, not sales calls. Show the final post and flag any risky phrasing.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
CDecide — diagnose the stuck momentI posted the CAC playbook draft and a moderator flagged it as promotional and hid it. I thought…+
My draft post got flagged as promotional by a moderator.
I posted the CAC playbook draft and a moderator flagged it as promotional and hid it. I thought I led with results and offered practical steps. I don’t know which line triggered the flag — the case study mention or the call-to-action — and I’m worried about being suspended. Should I edit and repost without the case study, message the moderator to appeal, or avoid posting in future? Recommend the safest recovery and a short apology message if I reach the moderator.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
DBecome — change the patternOver the last year we published 12 posts in three groups; four were flagged as promotional and…+
Our group posts either get flagged or get no engagement.
Over the last year we published 12 posts in three groups; four were flagged as promotional and the rest had single-digit comments despite being useful. We waste time and damage rapport with community moderators. What habit should I change to reliably get engagement without risking flags? Give one change to how we position results and one to the CTA we use in group posts.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?

Questions people actually ask

honest answers, no sign-up

Every task here was seen in the real world. Someone doing the job named it, a real job ad asked for it, or a lot of people asked about it online.

If nothing real showed a task, it is not on the page. That is the whole rule.

They are the same job approached four ways, because what you need depends on where you are.

Get it done today. Make it easy for the next person to say yes to. Work out the right move when you are stuck. Learn the pattern so the job stops coming back.

For most of these jobs it can carry the heavy thinking - draft it, sort it, check it, rehearse it with you.

It cannot sit in your chair, take the blame when a number is wrong, or notice what nobody wrote down. Let it do the first 80%. Keep the last 20% that is truly yours.

No. Copy any prompt and paste it into the AI you already use. No account, no score, no wall in the way.

Any of them. The prompts describe the work rather than naming a product, so they are not tied to one assistant.

That is also why they keep working when you switch.

Change it freely. Every prompt is a starting line, not a rule.

Put in your real numbers, your real names and your real deadline. The more you make it yours, the better the answer comes back.

The tasks come from real job ads, published job data and the questions people ask in public forums.

The steps come from LinkedIn's own documentation, with practitioner sources for the traps the manual does not mention.

Push once. Ask it to sharpen the weakest part and to say what it assumed.

Most wrong answers come from a missing detail rather than a bad prompt - tell it the thing it could not know.