◆ Salesforce

Remove header actions from lightning-datatable

This is real work, not a feature someone invented — it comes from real job ads and real questions people asked. Below are four ready AI prompts: get it done, make it easy for the next person to say yes to, work out the right move when you are stuck, and stop it coming back.

4prompts

The same task, four prompts

today's deadline · the next reviewer · the stuck moment · the pattern
AExecute — do the immediate taskRemove the header actions from the lightning-datatable on the 'Accounts with Open…+
Remove the header actions from the lightning-datatable on the 'Accounts with Open Opportunities' view, specifically for the 'Opportunity Name' and 'Close Date' columns, so that reps don't accidentally filter crucial pipeline data.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
BImprove — make it easier to acceptBefore we push the new 'Client Engagement' component live, make sure the lightning-datatable…+
Before we push the new 'Client Engagement' component live, make sure the lightning-datatable doesn't show any header actions. We want a clean, simple view for our account managers, not a confusing array of options that might break their workflow.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
CDecide — diagnose the stuck momentThe sales team is complaining that the new 'Lead Activity' table is too cluttered, and they…+
The sales team is complaining that the new 'Lead Activity' table is too cluttered and they can't find the information they need.
The sales team is complaining that the new 'Lead Activity' table is too cluttered, and they can't find the information they need quickly. I removed some header actions, but they still feel overwhelmed by the remaining filters. I'm afraid if I remove too many, they'll lose essential functionality. What's the best next move to balance usability with necessary filtering for our reps?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?
DBecome — change the patternI keep getting requests to simplify tables, but I'm always hesitant to remove features that…+
I keep getting requests to simplify tables, but I'm always hesitant to remove features that might be useful to someone.
I keep getting requests to simplify tables, but I'm always hesitant to remove features that might be useful to someone, even if only a few use them. This often leads to cluttered interfaces that frustrate the majority. What habit should I change to proactively design cleaner, more focused tables without constantly reacting to complaints?
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed. Helpful?

Questions people actually ask

honest answers, no sign-up

Every task here was seen in the real world. Someone doing the job named it, a real job ad asked for it, or a lot of people asked about it online.

If nothing real showed a task, it is not on the page. That is the whole rule.

They are the same job approached four ways, because what you need depends on where you are.

Get it done today. Make it easy for the next person to say yes to. Work out the right move when you are stuck. Learn the pattern so the job stops coming back.

For most of these jobs it can carry the heavy thinking - draft it, sort it, check it, rehearse it with you.

It cannot sit in your chair, take the blame when a number is wrong, or notice what nobody wrote down. Let it do the first 80%. Keep the last 20% that is truly yours.

No. Copy any prompt and paste it into the AI you already use. No account, no score, no wall in the way.

Any of them. The prompts describe the work rather than naming a product, so they are not tied to one assistant.

That is also why they keep working when you switch.

Change it freely. Every prompt is a starting line, not a rule.

Put in your real numbers, your real names and your real deadline. The more you make it yours, the better the answer comes back.

The tasks come from real job ads, published job data and the questions people ask in public forums.

The steps come from Salesforce's own documentation, with practitioner sources for the traps the manual does not mention.

Push once. Ask it to sharpen the weakest part and to say what it assumed.

Most wrong answers come from a missing detail rather than a bad prompt - tell it the thing it could not know.