The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+We need a first draft of the community program outline for the social work initiative by Tuesday so…
Execute — do the immediate task
+We need a first draft of the community program outline for the social work initiative by Tuesday so I can review it before Thursday’s partner meeting. Include program goals, target population with demographic markers, two staffing models with cost estimates, and a month-by-month pilot timeline. Verify the budget lines add to the totals and note any grant restrictions.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I present the program outline to partners, make it easy for them to say yes: put the outcome…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I present the program outline to partners, make it easy for them to say yes: put the outcome metrics and one-line budget summary at the top, bold any assumptions about participant numbers, call out risks that would make a funder hesitate, and append the short bios of proposed staff with relevant experience.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I received a draft that promises two full-time caseworkers but the budget only covers one. I’m…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+The draft program timeline assumes more staff than budget allows.
I received a draft that promises two full-time caseworkers but the budget only covers one. I’m worried partners will reject the pilot if I surface that gap, yet approving the draft as-is risks failure. Should I revise the timeline to match one caseworker, propose a phased hire, or present the gap and request bridge funding? Which choice gives the best chance of partner buy-in and program integrity?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Repeatedly we produce program outlines that assume ideal staffing, then partners push back and…
Become — change the pattern
+Each program proposal inflates staffing then stalls in partner review.
Repeatedly we produce program outlines that assume ideal staffing, then partners push back and timelines slip. Where does our planning habit fail — optimism bias, lack of early funder input, or poor cost modeling — and what specific habit should we change so proposals are realistic from the first draft?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Where the evidence lives
Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.
Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.