Recruit and hire new faculty.

Recruit and hire new faculty. — real work, not an imagined feature: named inside 10 evidenced career tasks. Below are four ready AI prompts for it, one per height of help: do it, make it easier to accept, decide when you are stuck, and change the pattern for good.

10career tasks name it
4prompt heights

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
We need to recruit and hire a new assistant professor in applied economics. Send the candidate…
We need to recruit and hire a new assistant professor in applied economics. Send the candidate packet and the recommended interview questions to Priya in faculty affairs and to Tom, the department chair, asking them to schedule campus interviews this month. Make sure the diversity statement and reference checks are completed before offers go out.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I circulate the candidate short list to the hiring committee, make the review easy: surface…
Before I circulate the candidate short list to the hiring committee, make the review easy: surface teaching and publication highlights on the first page, flag any gaps on tenure-track readiness, make salary expectations findable, and flag anything that would make a committee member hesitate to invite a candidate for campus visit.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
The committee divided two-to-two over whether to advance a promising candidate who has strong…

the search committee split on teaching vs research

The committee divided two-to-two over whether to advance a promising candidate who has strong applied work but a thin record of grad-level teaching. I cannot tell how much teaching should outweigh research for our department this year. What is the likeliest departmental priority and the best next step to resolve the tie without delaying offers to other candidates?

Become — change the pattern

+
Over several searches we keep getting stuck during the internal shortlisting step, costing us good…

faculty searches repeatedly stall at committee review

Over several searches we keep getting stuck during the internal shortlisting step, costing us good candidates who accept elsewhere. Are we failing on role definition, committee timeline discipline, or candidate communication? Recommend one repeatable change to stop becoming a second choice for top applicants.

Where the evidence lives

Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.

Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.