The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need the attached photos captioned for the gallery submission to the municipal arts office.…
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need the attached photos captioned for the gallery submission to the municipal arts office. Caption each image with the location, subject, camera and lens used, and a single-sentence mood line suitable for a public catalog. Send captions to me and to Claire in curatorial by Thursday so we can include them in the packet.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before these go to the municipal arts office, make the captions easy for a non-photographer judge…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before these go to the municipal arts office, make the captions easy for a non-photographer judge to scan. Put location and subject first, list camera and lens on the second line, then a one-sentence mood line that explains why this shot matters. Flag any captions that use jargon or are longer than 20 words.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I just captioned the ten gallery photos and sent a draft to Claire; she replied that several read…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I finished captions but Claire said several feel 'too technical'.
I just captioned the ten gallery photos and sent a draft to Claire; she replied that several read as 'too technical' and may confuse the jurors. I am the photographer submitting work, Claire is the curator deciding what stays. I am afraid simplifying will lose the technical credit and alienate judges who notice craft. I cannot tell whether the jurors actually want technical detail. What is the likely diagnosis and the best next move?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Every show cycle I rewrite captions three times after feedback, losing hours and missing internal…
Become — change the pattern
+Repeatedly rewriting captions after curator notes.
Every show cycle I rewrite captions three times after feedback, losing hours and missing internal deadlines. I want a stable habit so captions are accurate, legible to jurors, and approved first pass. What editing ritual or caption template should I adopt to cut rework and keep both technical and public audiences satisfied?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Where the evidence lives
Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.
Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.