Kids are wonderful and also wildly expensive, so let’s raise them with more love and less financial chaos.
There’s no single honest number because it depends heavily on where you live, how many kids you have, and the choices you make. Big drivers are housing, childcare, education, and health, not baby gadgets or occasional treats. A more useful way to think about it is: can we keep saving a bit for our own future, keep a small emergency buffer, and still cover the basics without constant panic? If yes, you’re probably in the right ballpark, even if you’re not funding every class trip or brand-name trainer. Focus on staying solvent and stable, not competing with some ‘average cost of a child’ headline.
No. Your job isn’t to match the richest family in the class; it’s to keep your kids loved, safe, and roughly stable. Every family has invisible limits – time, money, health, support – and children are usually more resilient than the adverts and social media suggest. You can’t control what other people spend, but you can teach your kids about values, boundaries, and priorities: why you choose groceries over gadgets, savings over status, family time over expensive trips. Many adults look back and remember security and affection, not the exact brands or destinations.
It feels that way for many parents, but it’s usually the opposite of selfish. If you underfund your retirement, your children may one day have to support you financially just as they’re raising their own families, which is a much heavier burden than having less help with university or an early car. Kids can work, get scholarships, choose cheaper schools, or take a bit longer to reach a goal; you can’t borrow for old age. A fair balance is to secure the basics of your own future first, then help your children as much as you reasonably can without risking becoming their future emergency.