The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Send the prototype link for the checkout flow to Priya in procurement and to Omar in customer…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Send the prototype link for the checkout flow to Priya in procurement and to Omar in customer success for review. Give them view comments access, include a note asking them to review the payment UI and copy by Thursday, and ensure the link opens to the desktop breakpoint by default. Confirm they can see the micro‑interactions before Friday.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I circulate this prototype to stakeholders, make it frictionless to approve. Put the…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I circulate this prototype to stakeholders, make it frictionless to approve. Put the acceptance criteria at the top of the prototype, set the default open screen to the critical flow, enable comment highlights so reviewers can jump to unresolved notes, and include a short checklist that tells reviewers what to verify and how to mark approval.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I shared the checkout prototype with procurement and got back a comment: 'looks odd' on the promo…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Stakeholders left vague comments
I shared the checkout prototype with procurement and got back a comment: 'looks odd' on the promo step, which doesn’t tell me what to change. The deadline for a pilot is three days away and I can’t chase every vague reviewer. What’s the best way to get specific, actionable feedback quickly so I can ship the checkout without endless back‑and‑forth?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Prototype reviews routinely take multiple rounds of vague feedback from stakeholders, delaying…
Become — change the pattern
+Prototype reviews drag on and stall launches
Prototype reviews routinely take multiple rounds of vague feedback from stakeholders, delaying launches and making engineering wait. I need to shorten review cycles and get decisive approvals. What changes to how I share prototypes and to the review process will make stakeholder feedback specific and approvals timely?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other interface design work people do in Figma.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.