The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Set up a slash command /deploy that triggers our deploy process in the #releases channel and…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Set up a slash command /deploy that triggers our deploy process in the #releases channel and notifies Claire and the on-call engineer. Require a one-line reason and push the confirmation to the deployment log. Configure it to fail-safe if the staging server is down. Install it today and run a test deploy with Claire.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I publish the /deploy slash command, make it easy for engineers to trust and use: surface…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I publish the /deploy slash command, make it easy for engineers to trust and use: surface the exact rollback plan up front, show the permissions the command needs, and flag any edge cases where it could be invoked accidentally (bot users, scheduled messages). Highlight what would make ops or security hesitate.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+We just deployed a new /deploy slash command that Claire and I tested; the command failed…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+We just bound deploys to a new slash command and one failed mid-process.
We just deployed a new /deploy slash command that Claire and I tested; the command failed mid-process and left a partial release. I’m worried the command lacks safe checks for in-progress releases and that on-call will get paged for a cascading issue. What immediate modifications or guardrails should I add to the command so we can use it safely in production tonight?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Over the past year we’ve created six slash commands to automate ops tasks and each time we’ve…
Become — change the pattern
+We keep building slash commands that automate risky ops without guardrails.
Over the past year we’ve created six slash commands to automate ops tasks and each time we’ve either caused an outage or required an emergency rollback because the command had insufficient checks or unclear permissions. What habit or review step should we adopt so future slash commands include idempotency, human confirmation, and an ownership handoff before they go live?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other team chat work people do in Slack.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.