Implement curricula

Implement curricula — real work, not an imagined feature: named inside 4 evidenced career tasks. Below are four ready AI prompts for it, one per height of help: do it, make it easier to accept, decide when you are stuck, and change the pattern for good.

4career tasks name it
4prompt heights

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
The new curriculum launch is next Monday and Karen, the Head of Teaching, wants the lesson sequence…
The new curriculum launch is next Monday and Karen, the Head of Teaching, wants the lesson sequence sent for sign-off. Send the full lesson schedule to Karen and then to Tom the curriculum reviewer, in that order, after checking every module has learning objectives and allocated minutes.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I send the curriculum to Karen in Teaching, make it easy to approve: put the learning…
Before I send the curriculum to Karen in Teaching, make it easy to approve: put the learning objective for each lesson in the first column, show total minutes per week at the top, flag lessons missing assessment criteria, and highlight any modules that deviate from the approved scope by more than one week.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I uploaded the unit plan and Tom flagged five lessons as missing assessment criteria. Karen expects…

Reviewer flagged five lessons for missing assessments

I uploaded the unit plan and Tom flagged five lessons as missing assessment criteria. Karen expects a signed schedule by Friday so materials can be printed. I don’t know whether Tom wants new assessments added or just references to existing ones. Should I add brief formative tasks to those five lessons and send for provisional approval, or wait for Tom’s detailed guidance and risk missing the print deadline? What would reviewers typically accept to keep schedule intact?

Become — change the pattern

+
We keep missing print and training deadlines because reviewers request content rewrites at the end…

frequent last-minute reviewer changes that push printing deadlines

We keep missing print and training deadlines because reviewers request content rewrites at the end of the cycle. It costs me time and frustrates teachers. Which habit reduces these late changes: require reviewers to annotate in the working document earlier, set a two-stage review with strict cutoffs, or change how we surface deviations so reviewers see impact sooner? Recommend the single policy change that most reduces rework in a small education team.

Where the evidence lives

Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.

Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.