Inspect air navigational aids

The beacon calibration report shows a variance beyond tolerance. Send the inspection summary and raw readings to Fahim in Navigation Aids and to Commander Reyes in Operations for sign-off, Fahim first, Reyes second, with a 48-hour review window tied to the next scheduled flight check. Before sending, confirm the coordinates and timestamp columns align with the field log and that any out-of-range reading has a linked photo or technician note.

Before I forward the nav-aid inspection file to Fahim, make it easy for him to approve. Put the three out-of-tolerance readings at the top with clear pass/fail tags, make the calibration constants findable, and flag any unit where the last inspection was more than a year ago. Add a one-line recommended action for each failing unit so Fahim can approve the repair plan in one pass.

I uploaded the field logger CSV and several timestamps look two hours late compared with the flight schedule. Fahim will assume the techs recorded local time incorrectly and delay sign-off; I'm worried it's a UTC/local mix. I can't tell from the file whether the logger or my import shifted time. What's the quickest way to diagnose which timestamps are wrong and fix them without losing auditability before Fahim sees the report?

Every inspection cycle we waste hours reconciling logger timestamps and beacon coordinates; Fahim questions my competence when reports arrive late. Where am I routinely losing accuracy—data import, technician training, or file templates—and what practical habit or one-step control could stop this recurring rework across all nav-aid inspections?