◆ AI · assist

Get through your day with an AI assistant

One assistant that reads your inbox, drafts your replies, plans your day, and stops the 9am panic before it starts.

4heights
8tasks
8roles do it

AI prompts

do it · improve it · decide · become
AExecute — “help me do it”Here's my day: [paste your calendar, to-do list, and any half-formed notes]. Act as my…+
Here's my day: [paste your calendar, to-do list, and any half-formed notes]. Act as my assistant and: 1) Sort everything into Do Now, Do Today, Can Wait. 2) Flag anything with a hard deadline and how many hours it needs. 3) Build me an hour-by-hour schedule from 9am, leaving 30 min buffer between big tasks. 4) Write a one-line prep note for each meeting. 5) List anyone I owe a reply to and draft the first sentence. 6) End with the single most important thing I cannot skip today.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed.
BImprove — “do it better”Here's a reply I drafted to a client who's annoyed: [paste it]. Keep my meaning but: cut it by…+
Here's a reply I drafted to a client who's annoyed: [paste it]. Keep my meaning but: cut it by a third, remove anything defensive or apologetic that isn't needed, make the first line get straight to what I'm doing about it, and flag any sentence that sounds passive-aggressive.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed.
CDecide — “help me choose”I have three things I could spend the next two hours on: [option 1], [option 2], [option 3].…+
I have three things I could spend the next two hours on: [option 1], [option 2], [option 3]. For each, tell me: what moves forward, what breaks if I skip it today, and how urgent it actually is versus how urgent it feels. Then pick one and tell me why in two sentences.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed.
DBecome — “help me grow”Walk me through how you just triaged my inbox and built my schedule, step by step, so I can do…+
Walk me through how you just triaged my inbox and built my schedule, step by step, so I can do it myself next time in five minutes. Give me the exact questions you asked about each item, the rule you used to decide urgent vs important, and a checklist I can run every morning without you.
when the reply comes backPush once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part, and to say what it assumed.

The real tasks

8 of them
I have to answer 40 emails before I even start real work
I have to remember three deadlines and forgot the fourth
I have to plan tomorrow but my brain is fried
I have to prep for a meeting in ten minutes
I have to follow up on people who ghosted me
I have to keep track of what I promised everyone
I have to write the same reply for the tenth time
I have to turn my messy notes into an actual plan

Who does this

8 roles
Executive AssistantFounderFreelancerProject ManagerSales RepStudentCustomer Support LeadConsultant

Questions people actually ask

with the jobs and tasks they touch

You don't paste 40 emails one by one. You paste the subject lines and senders, or forward a digest, and let it triage from that. The full text only matters for the ones you actually reply to.

  1. Copy your inbox list — sender, subject, and first line each
  2. Paste it and say 'sort into Reply Now, Reply Later, Ignore, and Delegate'
  3. Ask it to draft first sentences only for the Reply Now pile
  4. Handle those, then batch the Reply Later group after lunch

Generic plans happen because you gave it generic input. Feed it your real energy pattern, your fixed meetings, and how long things actually take you — not how long they should take.

  1. Give it your fixed appointments with times locked
  2. Tell it when your brain is sharp and when it's dead
  3. List your tasks with your honest time estimate, not the optimistic one
  4. Ask it to schedule hard thinking in your sharp hours and email in the dead ones
  5. Tell it to leave one empty block for the fire that will start

The trick is not sounding needy or robotic. Give it the original message and how long it's been, and ask for a short nudge that gives the person an easy out — that gets replies.

  1. Paste the original message and say how many days it's been
  2. Ask for a two-line follow-up that references the original briefly
  3. Tell it to add a specific yes/no question so replying is easy
  4. Ask for one version that's warm and one that's more direct
  5. Send the warm one first, save the direct one for a week later

Ten minutes is enough if you stop trying to read everything. Give it the invite, the last email thread, and what you want out of the meeting, and let it build you a one-page brief.

  1. Paste the meeting invite and the most recent email thread
  2. Say who's attending and what you want to walk out with
  3. Ask for three talking points and two questions you should ask
  4. Ask it to flag anything unresolved from last time
  5. Read it once, then walk in

Dump your sent messages, Slack, and notes into it and ask it to pull out every commitment you made. You made more promises than you remember — that's the whole point.

  1. Paste your sent emails and chat messages from the week
  2. Ask it to extract every 'I'll' and 'I can' as a commitment
  3. Have it list who you owe, what, and by when if a date was mentioned
  4. Sort by deadline and flag the ones with no date attached
  5. Send a quick update on anything you're going to miss

It's fast at the sorting, drafting, and summarizing — the stuff that eats your morning but doesn't need your judgment. The judgment is still yours, and pretending otherwise is how you send a confident email full of made-up details.

  • It does: triage, first drafts, summaries, scheduling, reminders
  • You do: the final decision, the relationships, the taste
  • It's great at speed, bad at knowing what's actually important to you
  • It will confidently invent a deadline you never mentioned
  • Anything client-facing gets your eyes before it leaves
  • The more context you give it, the less it guesses
see alsoFounder →

Because it planned for a version of you who has no meetings, perfect focus, and eight uninterrupted hours. That person doesn't exist.

Feed it your real constraints — the school run, the 2pm slump, the fact that 'quick task' takes you an hour. A plan you'll actually follow beats a perfect one you won't.

see alsoStudent →

Checking a draft takes two minutes. Writing it from scratch takes fifteen. The assistant isn't there to remove you — it's there to skip the blank page and the boring first 80%.

You go from creator to editor, and editing is faster and less draining. That's the whole trade.

Paste all 30 subject lines in, ask it to flag anything about the call and anything on fire, and ignore the rest until after. Prep the call first, batch the emails after.

Don't reply to everything now. The call is the thing with a hard time on it — protect that hour.

Write your angry version, paste it in, and ask the AI to keep the facts but strip every defensive and sarcastic line. Then ask it what the client actually wants underneath the anger.

Reply to the want, not the tone. That defuses it faster than any apology, and you didn't send the email you'd regret.

Dump the whole mess in — every request, every task, no filter — and ask it to name the one thing that, if done today, makes the rest quieter tomorrow. Then ask what genuinely breaks if you ignore the rest until Thursday.

Most of the noise isn't urgent, it just feels loud. Let it separate loud from important.

Both handle triage and drafting well. The difference shows up in tone and how they handle a long messy dump of context.

What you wantClaude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Terra
Email drafts that sound humanWarmer, less stiffFast, more formal
Handling a huge messy context dumpHolds it betterCan lose threads
Quick daily triage speedSteadySnappier
see alsoFounder →

Switching tools all day is its own kind of tax. One good assistant that knows your patterns usually beats juggling three specialists, unless one job is a huge part of your week.

ApproachGood forThe catch
One assistant for allSimplicity, it learns your styleJack of all trades on niche work
Different tool per taskBest-in-class each jobSetup and switching overhead
One main, one backupCross-check big decisionsYou do the comparing

No, but it'll change the job. The typing and scheduling shrink; the reading-the-room, protecting-the-boss's-time, knowing-who-not-to-book stuff doesn't. That's the part nobody can paste into a prompt.

The EAs who thrive are the ones who let it take the grunt work and spend the freed hours on judgment. The ones who only ever did the grunt work should be paying attention.

Trust the sorting, verify the facts. It's reliable at 'this is more urgent than that' and unreliable at remembering a detail you only mentioned once — it'll fill the gap with a confident guess.

Spot-check the dates and names on anything that goes out the door. Two minutes of checking beats one embarrassing email with a meeting time it invented.