Chapter 27 · Grammar Academy

Paragraph Architecture: Topic Sentences, Paragraph Structure, PEEL, Unity & Order

A paragraph is one idea, developed, in an order a reader can feel. This guide covers the Paragraph Check of topic, development, order and boundary, topic sentences stated and implied, developing with examples, reasons, facts and detail, the sentence that does not belong, order by time, place, importance and general to specific, expository and persuasive paragraphs, cause and effect, compare and contrast, definition, introductions and conclusions, when to split, linking paragraphs, notes to paragraph, summarising, revising for unity and order, exam paragraph tasks and close reading, with clear examples, for learners aged 5 to 19.

▶ Open the interactive paragraph architecture lesson

For beginners · ages 5–8

Sentences that live together

A paragraph is a group of sentences about one idea. Every sentence in it is about that same idea.

A paragraph: sentences that live together.

"Our school has a big garden. Tomatoes grow near the gate. Beans climb up the fence. Every Friday, our class waters the plants."

What is it about? The school garden. Every sentence tells you about it.
The group of sentencesWhat is it about?A paragraph?
My cat is grey. She sleeps on my bed. She likes warm milk.my catYes
The bus was late. We sang songs on the way. We reached the zoo at ten.the trip to the zooYes
My cat is grey. The bus was late. Rain is wet.no one thingNo
Grandpa grows roses. Roses need water. He waters them each morning.Grandpa's rosesYes

On a page, you can see where a paragraph starts. Its first line begins on a new line, and it often starts a little way in from the edge, with a small gap. Some books leave a blank line between paragraphs instead. Both tell the reader the same thing: a new group starts here.

This chapter has a four-question test for every paragraph, called the Paragraph Check. Its first question starts right here: what is the one idea these sentences are all about?

You can see a paragraph before you even read it. Writers use the page to show where one group ends and the next begins.

What you see on the pageWhat it tells youWhere you find it
The first line starts a little way in from the edgea new paragraph starts heremany storybooks and school books
A blank line between two groupsone paragraph has ended and a new one startsmany web pages, emails and some books
A line that does not reach the right edgeoften the last line of a paragraphalmost every page

Notice three things. First, a paragraph is more than one line on the page. A long paragraph can fill many lines, and each new sentence carries on straight after the last one, on the same line, until the group is finished.

Second, the gap or the blank line is only a sign. It does not make a paragraph on its own. If a writer puts a gap in front of sentences about four different things, the gap is there, but the group still does not live together.

Third, a paragraph can be about a person, a place, an animal, a thing or something that happened. "My cat", "the school garden" and "our trip to the zoo" are all ideas a paragraph can be about. What matters is that there is one of them, and that every sentence in the group is about it.

Picture a row of houses on a street. Each house is a paragraph, and the people inside it are the sentences. Everyone in one house belongs to the same family: they live together. A new family lives in the next house along. The gap between two houses is like the gap at the start of a new paragraph. You would not put a stranger to sleep in a family's house just because there was a bed free.

This section gives you the idea of a paragraph: sentences about one idea, kept together. The next sections build on it. Section 2 shows that a new idea needs a new paragraph. Section 3 finds the one sentence that tells you what the idea is. Sections 4 and 5 check that every other sentence adds more about it, and find the one that does not belong. Section 6 puts the sentences in a sensible order.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Some sentences can seem to belong to two different paragraphs. Read this group: "Mira has a pet rabbit. The rabbit is white with pink ears. Mira also has a goldfish." Is it about Mira's rabbit? The first two sentences are. But the third is about a goldfish. So is this group one idea or two? It depends on what the paragraph is about. If the idea is "Mira's rabbit", the goldfish sentence does not belong. It should go in its own paragraph, about the goldfish. But if the idea is "Mira's pets", then the rabbit and the goldfish both belong, because both are her pets. So the same sentence can live in one paragraph and not in another. It all depends on the one idea. That is why the first question is always the same: what is this paragraph about? Say the idea in a few words first. Then look at each sentence and ask if it belongs to that idea. When the idea is small, like "Mira's rabbit", fewer sentences fit. When the idea is bigger, like "Mira's pets", more of them fit, but they must still all be about that one idea.

Did you know that the word paragraph once meant a little mark written beside the lines? It comes from two old Greek words: para, which means "beside", and graphein, which means "to write". Long ago, writers did not always start a new line for a new idea. Instead, they wrote a small mark beside the text to show where a new idea began. One of those marks is still around today. It looks like a backwards letter P with two lines, like this: ¶. It is called a pilcrow, and you can still find it in some writing tools. So a paragraph began life as a little sign beside the words. Today the sign is a new line, a gap or a blank line, but the job is the same: it tells the reader that a new group of sentences is starting.

A paragraph is about one idea. Sentences that only sit next to each other on the page are not a paragraph for that reason alone. The gap at the start, or the blank line above, shows where a paragraph begins. It does not make the sentences belong together. Different books show a new paragraph in different ways. Some use a small gap at the start of the line, and some use a blank line between groups. Both are right. In this band you will meet short paragraphs of three to five sentences. Later you will meet longer ones, but the idea stays the same.

  1. Read the whole group of sentences once before you decide.
  2. Ask what all the sentences are about.
  3. Say the idea in a few words, like "my cat".
  4. Check that every sentence is about that same idea.
  5. Look for the new line, the gap or the blank line that starts a paragraph.
  6. Remember that a paragraph can fill many lines.
  7. Do not decide just because sentences sit next to each other.
  8. Name the idea as small as it really is, not "everything".
  9. When you write, keep sentences about one idea together.
  10. Start a new line when you start a new idea.
A paragraph is a group of sentences about one idea. "Our school has a big garden. Tomatoes grow near the gate. Beans climb up the fence." All three are about the garden, so they make a paragraph. "My cat is grey. The bus was late. Rain is wet." These are about three things, so they do not make a paragraph, even though they sit together. To check a group of sentences: 1. Read it all the way through. 2. Ask what it is about. 3. Say the idea in a few words. 4. Check every sentence against that idea. On a page, a paragraph starts on a new line, often with a small gap at the start or a blank line above it. The gap shows where a paragraph starts, but only the one idea holds it together. Next: when the idea changes, a new paragraph begins.

One idea, one paragraph

One idea goes in one paragraph. When the idea changes, a new paragraph begins.

A new idea: a new paragraph.

"I have a cat called Coco. She is black and white. She sleeps in the sun."

"My school is near the river. It has a big blue gate."

The cat is one idea. The school is a new idea, so it starts a new paragraph.
The sentencesThe ideasHow many paragraphs?
We went to the beach. We swam in the sea. We built a sand castle.the beach tripone
We went to the beach. We swam in the sea. At home, Dad cooked fish. We ate it with rice.the beach trip, then dinner at hometwo
My brother is ten. He plays the drums. My sister is six. She loves to dance.my brother, then my sistertwo
My grandmother tells stories. Her stories are about kings and tigers. She tells one every night.Grandmother's storiesone

Look at the brother and sister row. Both are in the same family, but each one is a new idea, so each gets a paragraph. This is the fourth question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: has a new idea started? If it has, a new paragraph starts too.

New ideas often start in a few common ways. When you see one of these, check whether the idea has changed.

What changesOne paragraph endsThe next paragraph begins
a new personAunt Lata grows roses in her garden.My uncle drives a big red truck.
a new placeThe park was full of children on swings.Back at home, the house was quiet.
a new timeIn the morning we packed our bags.That night we slept in a tent.
a new thingMy kite is red and has a long tail.My new football is black and white.

Notice three things. First, the new idea is often a new person, place, time or thing. These are the easiest changes to see.

Second, a new name or place does not always mean a new idea. In "Riya's kite flew high. Her brother Dev held the spool while she ran," a new name, Dev, appears, but it is still all about flying the kite. Ask what the sentence is about, not only who is in it.

Third, the sentences after a change all go into the new paragraph, until the idea changes again. A long piece can have three, four or many paragraphs, one for each idea. A writer does not fit every idea into one paragraph, and does not give one idea five paragraphs either.

Picture a train with carriages. Each carriage is a paragraph, and it carries one kind of load: one carriage carries apples, the next carries books, the next carries chairs. You would not throw chairs into the apple carriage. When the load changes, a new carriage begins. The join between two carriages is the start of a new paragraph.

In section 1 you learned that a paragraph is a group of sentences about one idea. This section adds the next step: when the idea changes, a new group begins. Section 3 shows the one sentence that often tells you what a paragraph's idea is. Later, in section 9, you will think about how long a paragraph should be, and in Craft you will learn to judge harder cases where a paragraph has slowly grown a second idea.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes a new idea grows out of the old one. Read this: "Ammu planted a mango seed. She watered it every day. After many weeks, a small tree grew. Now the tree gives sweet mangoes. Ammu shares them with her friends." Is this one idea or two? The seed and the tree are linked: the tree grew from the seed. But look at the last sentence. Sharing mangoes with friends is a little different from growing the tree. Here is a way to decide. Try to name the whole group in a few words. "Ammu's mango tree" fits every sentence, even the sharing one, because she shares the tree's mangoes. So this can stay as one paragraph. Now change the last sentence: "Ammu's friends play cricket after school." Cricket is not about the mango tree at all. Now the name "Ammu's mango tree" does not fit, so that sentence would start a new paragraph. So the test is not whether two sentences are linked. It is whether one short name fits all of them. If one name fits, keep them together. If you need two names, you need two paragraphs.

Did you know that very old books often had no paragraphs at all? Long ago, many books were copied out by hand. Some writers ran their words together in one long block, and in some of the oldest writing, the words did not even have spaces between them. Readers had to work out where each idea started and stopped on their own. Over many years, writers found ways to help. They put a mark beside a new idea, or started it on a new line, or made its first letter big and coloured. You can still see those big, decorated first letters in some old books today. The new line we use now does the same job in a simpler way. Every time you start a new paragraph for a new idea, you are using a trick that took readers and writers a very long time to find.

A new paragraph starts when the idea changes, not after a set number of sentences. Sentences about the same person, the same place or the same day can still hold two ideas. Ask what each sentence is about, not only who is in it. A new name in a sentence does not always mean a new idea. Check whether one short name still fits the whole group. In this band the change of idea is usually easy to see: a new person, place, time or thing. Later bands will show harder cases.

  1. Read the whole piece once before you decide anything.
  2. Say what the first sentence is about.
  3. Read on one sentence at a time.
  4. Ask: is this still the same idea?
  5. When the answer is no, put your finger on that sentence.
  6. Start a new paragraph at that sentence.
  7. Keep every sentence about the new idea in the new paragraph.
  8. Look for a new person, place, time or thing as a clue.
  9. Check that one short name fits each paragraph.
  10. Do not start a new paragraph while the idea is still the same.
  11. When you finish writing, read it again and point to where each new idea starts.
One idea goes in one paragraph. When the idea changes, a new paragraph begins. "I have a cat called Coco. She sleeps in the sun." is one idea. "My school is near the river." is a new idea, so it starts a new paragraph. To find where a new paragraph should start: 1. Read the whole piece. 2. Say what the first sentence is about. 3. Read on and ask: is this still the same idea? 4. Start a new paragraph at the sentence where the idea changes. A new person, place, time or thing is often a clue. But sentences about the same person can still hold two ideas, like Kiran's cricket and his mother's job. Try naming each group in a few words. If one name fits, keep it together. If you need two names, you need two paragraphs. Next: the one sentence that tells you what a paragraph is about.

The sentence that says it all

The topic sentence tells you what the whole paragraph is about. Every other sentence in the paragraph tells you more about it.

The topic sentence: the umbrella over the paragraph.

"Our school fair was great fun. There was a magic show. A man juggled flaming sticks! We won a big teddy bear."

The topic sentence is "Our school fair was great fun." The magic show, the juggler and the teddy bear all sit under it.
The paragraphThe topic sentenceWhy
Rani's cat is very lazy. It sleeps all morning. It naps after lunch. It even yawns while it eats.Rani's cat is very lazy.sleeping, napping and yawning all show the cat is lazy
Our kitchen is always busy. Mum cooks rice. Dad cuts vegetables. My sister washes plates.Our kitchen is always busy.each person adds to the busy kitchen
The beach has lots to do. You can swim. You can build castles. You can look for shells.The beach has lots to do.swimming, castles and shells are things to do

Each topic sentence here comes first. That is very common, and it is the first place to look. This is the first question of the Paragraph Check: what is the one idea? When a paragraph has a topic sentence, it answers that question for you.

A good way to test a topic sentence is to ask if every other sentence fits under it.

Try this sentence as the topicDoes every other sentence fit under it?Topic sentence?
Grandpa's garden is full of fruit.Yes: the mango tree, the guava bush and the banana plant are all fruit in his garden.Yes
A mango tree grows by the gate.No: it does not cover the guava bush or the banana plant.No
The guavas are green and sweet.No: it covers only the guavas.No

Notice three things. First, a topic sentence is usually wider than the others. It talks about the whole thing, and the other sentences talk about one part each.

Second, a topic sentence is often short and simple. "Grandpa's garden is full of fruit." is not long, and it is not exciting, but it covers everything.

Third, the topic sentence and the other sentences work as a team. The topic sentence says what the paragraph is about, and the others give the details. In the next section you will look closely at those details. In Practice you will meet topic sentences that come in the middle or at the end.

Picture a big umbrella on a rainy day. Under it stand three or four friends, keeping dry. The umbrella is the topic sentence, and the friends are the other sentences. A good topic sentence is wide enough to cover every friend. If one friend is standing outside in the rain, either the umbrella is too small, or that friend belongs under a different umbrella.

In sections 1 and 2 you learned that a paragraph holds one idea and that a new idea needs a new paragraph. This section names the sentence that states that idea: the topic sentence. Section 4 looks at the other sentences and how they add more about it. Section 5 uses the topic sentence to find a sentence that does not belong. In Practice, section 11, you will find topic sentences that sit in the middle or at the end.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes two sentences both look wide enough to be the topic sentence. Read this: "Saturday was a busy day. In the morning I went to my dance class. In the afternoon we visited my aunt. It was a really busy day." The first sentence and the last sentence say almost the same thing. So which one is the topic sentence? Both of them cover all the other sentences. The first one tells you the idea before the details. The last one says it again after the details, to finish the paragraph. Writers sometimes do this on purpose. The first one is still the topic sentence, because it is the one that tells you the idea at the start. The last one is a closing sentence that brings you back to it. Now try a different case: "In the morning I went to my dance class. In the afternoon we visited my aunt. Saturday was a busy day." Here there is no sentence at the start that covers everything. The last sentence is the topic sentence. It comes at the end, like an answer. So the topic sentence is usually first, but the real test is not where it sits. It is whether it covers all the other sentences.

Did you know that the word topic comes from an old Greek word for a place? The Greek word was topos, and it meant "a place". Long ago, teachers of speaking talked about the "places" a speaker could go to find ideas for a speech. Over a very long time, the word came to mean the subject that something is about. You can still hear topos in other English words. A topographic map is a map that shows the shape of a place, with its hills and valleys. So a topic sentence is a little like a map pin. It shows the reader the place where the whole paragraph lives. Once you have found the pin, every other sentence is easy to find on the map.

The topic sentence is often the first sentence, but not always. The real test is whether it covers all the other sentences. A topic sentence does not have to be exciting, long or full of detail. It is often short and plain. Some paragraphs say the idea again at the end. That last sentence is a closing sentence; the one at the start is still the topic sentence. Some paragraphs, especially in stories, have no topic sentence at all. You will meet those in Craft. In this band, the paragraphs have one.

  1. Read the whole paragraph before you choose.
  2. Look at the first sentence first, because the topic sentence is often there.
  3. Ask if that sentence covers every other sentence.
  4. Try saying "This paragraph is about..." with its idea.
  5. Do not choose a sentence just because it is exciting.
  6. Do not choose a sentence just because it is long.
  7. Do not choose a sentence that is about only one part.
  8. If the first sentence does not cover everything, look at the last one.
  9. When you write, start with a sentence that says your idea.
  10. Check that every other sentence fits under your topic sentence.
The topic sentence tells you what the whole paragraph is about. "Our school fair was great fun. There was a magic show. A man juggled flaming sticks! We won a big teddy bear." The topic sentence is "Our school fair was great fun." It covers every other sentence. To find the topic sentence: 1. Read the whole paragraph. 2. Look at the first sentence. 3. Ask: does it cover all the others? 4. If not, look for the sentence that does. The topic sentence is not the most exciting sentence, the longest one, or the one with the most detail. It is the umbrella over all the others. It is often first, and sometimes the paragraph says the idea again at the end to close. Next: the other sentences, and how they add more about the topic sentence.

Adding more about it

After the topic sentence, each sentence adds something new about it. Together they show the reader what the topic sentence means.

Add something new in every sentence.

Says the same: "My dog Tiger is friendly. Tiger is a very friendly dog. He is so friendly."

Adds more: "My dog Tiger is friendly. He wags his tail at every visitor. He lets babies pat his head."

The second one shows you Tiger being friendly.
Topic sentenceA sentence that adds something newWhat it adds
Our garden is full of colour.Red roses grow by the gate.what it looks like
My grandmother is a good cook.She makes soft idlis every Sunday.what she does
The trip to the zoo was exciting.A tiger roared right in front of us.what happened
Our class has lots of pets.We have two rabbits and a goldfish.an example

This is the second question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: does every sentence tell more about it? A sentence that only says the topic sentence again does not.

There are many kinds of "more" a sentence can add. Here are four you will use often.

What the sentence addsA question it answersFor "The market is busy."
what it looks like or sounds likeWhat would I see or hear?Sellers shout out their prices.
what someone doesWho is doing what?People push through with big bags.
what happenedWhat took place?A cart of melons tipped over.
an exampleCan you show me one?One stall sells fifty kinds of rice.

Notice three things. First, each sentence answers a question the reader might ask. If you imagine your reader asking "What else?" or "Show me!", you will know what to add next.

Second, a good paragraph can mix these. The market paragraph could have a sound, an action and an example, all in one paragraph. Each sentence adds a different piece.

Third, adding more does not mean adding anything at all. Each new sentence must still be about the topic sentence. "The market is busy. My shoes are new." adds something new, but it is not about the busy market. In the next section you will learn to find a sentence like that and take it out.

Picture building a tower with blocks. The topic sentence is the bottom block, and each sentence after it is a new block on top. Every new block makes the tower taller. If you take the same block off and put it back on again, the tower does not grow at all. That is what saying the topic sentence again does. A real new block, a real new detail, makes the paragraph grow.

In section 3 you found the topic sentence, the umbrella. This section looks under the umbrella, at the sentences that add more about it. Section 5 uses both ideas to find the one sentence that does not belong. In Practice, sections 12, 13 and 14 give these added sentences their proper names: an example, a reason, and facts and detail. For now, ask the simple question: what new thing does this sentence tell me?

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes a sentence looks new, but it is really the topic sentence again. Read this: "Rohan is a fast runner. He can run very quickly. He always wins races." The second sentence uses new words, "run very quickly". But a fast runner already means someone who runs quickly. So the second sentence adds nothing new. It is the topic sentence in different clothes. The third sentence is different. "He always wins races" tells us something that happens because he is fast. It adds a new fact. How can you tell them apart? Try this test. Cover the topic sentence with your hand. Read only the other sentence. Then ask: did I learn anything I would not know from the topic sentence alone? For "He can run very quickly", the answer is no. You already knew that from "fast runner". For "He always wins races", the answer is yes. The topic sentence did not tell you about the races. So new words are not enough. A sentence adds more only when it adds a new piece of information: something the topic sentence did not already say.

Did you know that the word detail comes from an old French word that means "to cut into pieces"? The old word was detaillier. It was used for cutting something big into small pieces, like a tailor cutting cloth, or a shopkeeper selling a big block of cheese one slice at a time. That is just what details do in a paragraph. The topic sentence is the big block: "The market is busy." The details cut it into small pieces the reader can take in one at a time: the shouting sellers, the people with bags, the cart of melons. You can still hear the old meaning in English today. When a shop sells goods to customers one by one, instead of in big loads, it is called retail, and the tail part comes from the same old French word for cutting.

Every sentence after the topic sentence should be about the topic and should also add something new. New words are not always new information. If a sentence only says the topic sentence again, it adds nothing. A new sentence can add what something looks like, what someone does, what happened, or an example. You can mix them in one paragraph. Some paragraphs end by saying the idea again on purpose, to close. That is a closing move, not a lack of detail, and you will meet it in Craft. In the middle of a paragraph, every sentence should add something.

  1. Find the topic sentence first.
  2. Read each other sentence and ask what new thing it tells you.
  3. Say the new thing in a few words.
  4. Cover the topic sentence and check if you still learn something new.
  5. Do not say the topic sentence again in other words.
  6. Imagine the reader asking "What else?" and answer.
  7. Add what something looks like, what someone does, or what happened.
  8. Give an example the reader can picture.
  9. Mix different kinds of detail in one paragraph.
  10. Check that every new sentence is still about the topic.
After the topic sentence, each sentence adds something new about it. "My dog Tiger is friendly. He wags his tail at every visitor. He lets babies pat his head." Each sentence shows Tiger being friendly in a new way. "My dog Tiger is friendly. Tiger is a very friendly dog. He is so friendly." These sentences add nothing new. They only say the topic again. A sentence can add: 1. what something looks like or sounds like, 2. what someone does, 3. what happened, 4. an example. New words are not enough. Cover the topic sentence and ask: did I learn something new? Every new sentence must also stay on the topic. Something new about something else does not belong. Next: the sentence that does not belong.

The sentence that does not belong

Every sentence in a paragraph should tell more about the topic sentence. A sentence that is about something else does not belong.

Check every sentence against the topic sentence.

"Rani's birthday party was fun. Her friends played musical chairs. Her friend Zoya also has a birthday in May. Everyone ate chocolate cake."

Zoya's birthday is a different idea. That sentence does not belong, even though it uses the word birthday.
The topic sentenceA sentence that belongsA sentence that does not belong
Our school library is a great place.It has thousands of books.Our school canteen sells samosas.
My cat Snowy is lazy.She sleeps all afternoon.My neighbour's cat is called Ginger.
The beach was crowded on Sunday.Families sat under umbrellas.I like to swim in the school pool.

Look at the cat row. The stray sentence is about a cat too, but not Snowy, and not about being lazy. This is the second question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: does every sentence tell more about the one idea? The sentence that does not is the one to take out.

A sentence that does not belong is not always easy to see. Here are three ways it can hide.

How it hidesTopic sentenceThe stray sentence
It is about something completely differentThe zoo trip was exciting.My bike has a flat tyre.
It shares a word with the topic sentenceGrandpa's garden is full of fruit.Grandpa also likes fruit juice.
It is about the same person, but a different ideaMeera is a great swimmer.Meera's brother is learning to cook.

Notice three things. First, the stray sentence that is about something completely different is the easiest to find. You will spot it almost at once.

Second, the stray sentence that shares a word is harder. "Grandpa also likes fruit juice" has the word fruit, but it is about what Grandpa drinks, not about his garden. Always check the idea, not the words.

Third, a stray sentence can be about the same person. Meera's brother is in Meera's family, but the paragraph is about Meera's swimming. The brother's cooking is a new idea.

When you find a stray sentence, you have two choices. You can take it out. Or, if it is worth keeping, you can move it into its own paragraph, as you learned in section 2.

Picture a family photo where everyone is wearing the same team shirt for the school sports day. Then you notice one person in a different shirt, standing at the edge, who is not part of the family at all. They just walked into the picture. The sentence that does not belong is that stranger in the photo. Once you see them, you cannot unsee them, and the photo looks right only when they step out.

In section 3 you found the topic sentence, and in section 4 you saw how other sentences add more about it. This section puts both together: you use the topic sentence as a test to find the one sentence that does not belong. In Practice, section 15, the paragraphs get longer and the stray sentence gets harder to find. In Master, section 35, you will revise your own longer drafts the same way.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes the stray sentence is about the topic word, but not about the topic idea. Read this: "Our dog Bruno is a good guard. He barks when strangers come near. He sleeps by the front door. Dogs come in many shapes and sizes." The last sentence is about dogs. The paragraph is about a dog. So does it belong? Look closely at the topic sentence. It is not just about dogs. It is about Bruno being a good guard. Barking at strangers shows Bruno guarding. Sleeping by the door shows Bruno guarding. But "Dogs come in many shapes and sizes" is about all dogs everywhere. It does not show Bruno guarding anything. So it does not belong, even though it is about dogs. Here is a test to try. Say the topic sentence, then say "and this shows it:" before the next sentence. "Bruno is a good guard, and this shows it: he barks when strangers come near." That works. "Bruno is a good guard, and this shows it: dogs come in many shapes and sizes." That does not work. The sentence that fails the test is the one that does not belong.

Did you know that the hardest stray sentences to spot are often the ones that look like they belong? Your brain is very good at reading quickly. When it sees a word it expects, like dog in a paragraph about a dog, it often says "yes, that fits" and moves on, before it has checked what the sentence really says. That is why editors, the people who check books before they are printed, often read a page slowly, one sentence at a time, sometimes even pointing with a finger. Slowing down makes the brain check the idea, not just the words. So when you look for the sentence that does not belong, try being an editor. Read slowly. Point to each sentence. Ask what it is really about, not just which words it uses.

Check the idea of each sentence, not just its words. A sentence can share a word with the topic sentence and still be about something else. A surprising or funny sentence can still belong, if it is about the topic. The topic sentence is the test, not the stray. Do not take it out. Sometimes every sentence belongs. Then the right answer is to keep the paragraph as it is. A stray sentence that is worth keeping can move into its own paragraph instead of being thrown away.

  1. Find the topic sentence first.
  2. Say its idea in a few words.
  3. Read every other sentence one at a time.
  4. Hold each one up against the topic idea.
  5. Ask: does this tell more about the idea?
  6. Do not decide by looking for the same words.
  7. Try the test: say "and this shows it:" before each sentence.
  8. Keep surprising or small sentences if they are about the topic.
  9. Take out the sentence that does not belong, or move it to its own paragraph.
  10. If every sentence belongs, keep the paragraph as it is.
  11. Read your own paragraph slowly, like an editor, pointing at each sentence.
Every sentence in a paragraph should tell more about the topic sentence. A sentence about something else does not belong. "Rani's birthday party was fun. Her friends played musical chairs. Her friend Zoya also has a birthday in May." The Zoya sentence is about a different birthday. It does not belong. To find the sentence that does not belong: 1. Find the topic sentence. 2. Say its idea in a few words. 3. Hold each sentence up against that idea. 4. Point to the one that does not fit. Check the idea, not the words. A stray sentence can share a word with the topic sentence. A surprising sentence can still belong. Sometimes every sentence belongs, and the answer is to keep the paragraph as it is. Next: putting a paragraph's sentences in order.

Putting things in order

When a paragraph tells a story or a set of steps, the sentences go in the order the things happen.

The order things happen.

Jumbled: "Ma pours the tea into a cup. She boils water in a pot. She adds tea leaves and milk."

In order: "Ma boils water in a pot. She adds tea leaves and milk. She pours the tea into a cup."

Every sentence belongs. Only the order changed, and now it makes sense.
What happensFirstNextLast
Growing a plantPlant the seed.Water it every day.A green shoot comes up.
Going to bedBrush your teeth.Put on your pyjamas.Switch off the light.
A trip to the shopWe walked to the shop.We bought some bread.We carried it home.

This is the third question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: is the order sensible? For a story or a set of steps, the sensible order is the order things happen.

You can use clues inside the sentences to find the right order, even when there are no words like first or then.

The clueAn exampleWhat it tells you
Something must exist before you use itYou make the tea before you pour it.making comes before pouring
Something must start before it can finishThe race starts before someone wins it.starting comes before winning
A thing changes over timeA seed becomes a shoot, then a plant.small comes before big
Times of the dayBreakfast, then lunch, then dinner.morning comes before night

Notice three things. First, you can often find the order just by thinking about the things themselves. You cannot eat a cake before it is baked, so baking comes first.

Second, words like first, next and then can help a reader follow the order. You will learn much more about those words in Chapter 21, Transitions and Flow. This section is about the order of the ideas themselves.

Third, the first and the last sentence are often the easiest to place. Find them first. Then the middle sentences are easier to fit between them, like the middle pieces of a puzzle.

Picture a line of footprints in the sand, going from the beach hut to the sea. Each footprint is a sentence. You can follow them one step at a time, from the hut to the water. If someone mixed up the footprints, so one near the sea came first and one near the hut came last, you would walk in circles. Sentences in the right order are footprints you can follow.

In sections 1 to 5 you learned what goes into a paragraph: one idea, a topic sentence, sentences that add more, and no strangers. This section adds the next question: in what order? Section 7 shows another kind of order for describing a place. In Practice, sections 16 to 19, you will meet order by time, order by place, general to specific, and the steps of a process.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes two sentences could swap places, and the paragraph still makes sense. Read this: "Priya packed her bag for the trip. She put in her toothbrush. She put in her pyjamas. Then she zipped the bag shut." Does the toothbrush have to go in before the pyjamas? Not really. She could pack them in either order. So those two sentences can swap. But look at the first and last sentences. Can Priya zip the bag shut before she puts anything in? No. Zipping the bag must come last. And starting to pack must come first. So some sentences have a fixed place, and some can move a little. How do you tell which is which? Ask this question about any two sentences: could this one really happen before that one? If the answer is no, their order is fixed. Zipping the bag cannot happen before packing. If the answer is "it could go either way", like the toothbrush and the pyjamas, either order is fine. When you are asked to fix an order, look first for the sentences whose place is fixed. Get those right, and the paragraph will make sense.

Did you know that some of the oldest stories in the world were told in order without being written down at all? Long before most people could read, storytellers kept long tales in their heads and told them aloud. To remember what came next, many of them relied on order. One thing led to the next, which led to the next, like links in a chain. You can see the same trick in many old children's rhymes and stories where each part builds on the one before, so the listener can remember the order easily. So the order of a story is not just neat. It is a way of remembering. When you tell things in the order they happen, you are using one of the oldest memory tricks people have.

For a story or a set of steps, put the sentences in the order the things happen. Words like first, next and then help the reader, but only when the sentences really are in that order. Chapter 21 teaches those words. Some sentences can swap places without breaking the paragraph. Others have a fixed place. Find the fixed ones first. Not every paragraph is ordered by time. A paragraph that describes a place may go from near to far, or from top to bottom. You will meet that in the next section.

  1. Read all the sentences first.
  2. Find the thing that happened first.
  3. Find the thing that happened last.
  4. Fit the middle sentences between them.
  5. Ask of any two sentences: could this one happen before that one?
  6. Use clues inside the sentences, not only words like first and then.
  7. Do not put the ending first just because it is exciting.
  8. Read your new order aloud to check it makes sense.
  9. When two sentences could go either way, either order is fine.
  10. When you write a story or steps, tell them in the order they happen.
When a paragraph tells a story or a set of steps, the sentences go in the order things happen. Jumbled: "Ma pours the tea into a cup. She boils water. She adds tea leaves and milk." In order: "Ma boils water. She adds tea leaves and milk. She pours the tea into a cup." Every sentence belonged both times. Only the order changed. To put sentences in order: 1. Read them all. 2. Find the first thing that happened. 3. Find the last thing. 4. Fit the middle ones between them. 5. Read it again to check. Use clues inside the sentences: you make something before you use it, and start something before you finish it. Some sentences can swap places. Others have a fixed place. Find the fixed ones first. Next: a paragraph about a place, built one idea at a time.

A paragraph about a place

A paragraph about a place says what the place is like, then shows it one detail at a time, moving through the place in one direction.

Walk the reader through the place.

"Nani's kitchen is a busy, happy place. By the door, a basket of onions sits on the floor. Next to it, a big pot bubbles on the stove. Above the stove, brass plates shine on a shelf. At the back, a small window lets in the morning sun."

Topic sentence first, then the door, the stove, the shelf, the window.
The partWhat it doesIn the kitchen paragraph
Topic sentencesays what the place is likeNani's kitchen is a busy, happy place.
Detailsadd something you could see, hear or smellonions, a bubbling pot, shining plates, sunlight
Ordermoves through the place in one directionfrom the door to the back
What stays outwhat happened there, who came, what you atethe Sunday trip, the laddoos, the late cousin

A place paragraph uses all four questions of the Paragraph Check at once: one idea, details that add to it, an order the reader can follow, and nothing from another idea.

There are several ways to move through a place. Choose one and keep to it.

The way you moveWhere you startAn example
near to farwhat is closest to youthe gate, then the path, then the house, then the hills behind
left to rightone side of the placethe bookshelf, then the desk, then the window
top to bottomthe highest thingthe fan on the ceiling, the pictures on the wall, the rug on the floor
outside to insidethe outside of a buildingthe red door, then the hall, then the kitchen

Notice three things. First, words like next to, above, behind and at the back help the reader follow you through the place. They are like signs on a path.

Second, you do not have to name every single thing. Pick the details that show your topic sentence. If the kitchen is busy and happy, choose the bubbling pot and the shining plates, not the light switch.

Third, you can use more than your eyes. A place has sounds and smells too. "The pot bubbles" is a sound. "The air smells of cardamom" is a smell. These details make a place feel real. In Practice, section 17, you will learn more about ordering a description by place.

Picture a camera moving slowly through a room in a film. It does not jump from the ceiling to the garden to the floor and back again. It glides from the door, past the table, to the window, showing one thing at a time. Your paragraph about a place is that camera. Each sentence is the next thing the camera shows, and the reader sees the room in the order the camera moves.

In sections 3 to 6 you learned the parts of a paragraph: the topic sentence, details that add more, no strangers, and a sensible order. This section puts them together to build a whole paragraph about a place. Section 8 builds a paragraph about a thing, like an animal or an object. In Practice, section 14 adds facts and sensory detail, and section 17 teaches order by place in more depth.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes a detail about a place seems to fit, but it does not show the topic sentence. Read this: "The library is a calm, quiet place. Soft cushions lie on the carpet. People read in silence. A loud vacuum cleaner roars in the corner." The vacuum cleaner is in the library. It is a real thing you could see and hear. So does it belong? It is in the place, but it does not show that the library is calm and quiet. In fact, it shows the opposite. A reader who has just been told the library is quiet will be confused. So a detail in a place paragraph must do two things. It must be in the place, and it must show what the topic sentence says about the place. If the vacuum cleaner really is part of the scene, the writer has two choices. Change the topic sentence, perhaps to "The library is usually calm, but not on cleaning day." Or leave the vacuum out and choose a different detail that shows the calm, like "A clock ticks softly on the wall." Every detail you choose should help the reader feel what your topic sentence says.

Did you know that some people remember long lists of things by imagining a place? There is an old memory trick, sometimes called a memory palace. You picture a place you know well, like your home, and walk through it in your mind. In each spot, you imagine one thing you want to remember: a banana on the doormat, a clock on the stairs, a kite on your bed. Later, you walk through the place again in your mind, and the things are waiting where you left them. The trick works because our brains are very good at remembering places and the order we move through them. That is also why a place paragraph that moves in one direction is easy to read. The reader's brain follows the path through the place, one spot at a time, and remembers it.

A place paragraph tells what the place is like. What happened there belongs in a story paragraph, not here. Choose one way to move through the place, such as near to far or top to bottom, and keep to it. You do not need every detail. Pick the ones that show your topic sentence. Every detail must be in the place and must show what the topic sentence says. A real detail that shows the opposite will confuse the reader.

  1. Choose one place.
  2. Picture it with your eyes closed.
  3. Say in a few words what it is like.
  4. Make that your topic sentence.
  5. Choose a starting spot, like the door.
  6. Move through the place in one direction.
  7. Add one detail in each sentence.
  8. Use sounds and smells as well as sights.
  9. Choose details that show your topic sentence.
  10. Keep out what happened there and who came.
  11. Use words like next to, above and behind to guide the reader.
  12. Read it back and check that a reader could picture the place without ever having been there.
  13. If a detail shows the opposite of your topic sentence, change the detail or change the topic sentence.
A paragraph about a place tells what the place is like and shows it one detail at a time. "Nani's kitchen is a busy, happy place. By the door, a basket of onions sits on the floor. Next to it, a big pot bubbles on the stove. Above the stove, brass plates shine on a shelf." To build a place paragraph: 1. Say what the place is like. That is your topic sentence. 2. Choose a starting spot. 3. Move through the place in one direction. 4. Add one detail in each sentence. Use sights, sounds and smells. Choose details that show your topic sentence. Keep out what happened there. "We went on Sunday" and "I ate three laddoos" belong in a story, not a place paragraph. Move like a camera, not like a bouncing ball. Next: a paragraph about a thing, like an animal or an object.

A paragraph about a thing

A paragraph about a thing names it in the topic sentence, then tells more about it from different sides: what it looks like, what it does and why it matters.

Look at a thing from three sides.

"Grandpa's radio is his favourite thing. It is old and brown, with two round knobs. Every morning, he turns it on to hear the news. He says it has been on the kitchen shelf since before I was born."

Looks, does, matters: the radio comes alive.
The questionFor a pet henFor a school bag
What does it look like?She has soft brown feathers.It is blue with two big pockets.
What does it do?She lays an egg every morning.It carries all my books and my lunch.
Why does it matter?Her eggs make our breakfast.Grandma gave it to me for my birthday.

This uses the second question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: does every sentence tell more about it? A thing paragraph answers by looking at the thing from more than one side.

A thing paragraph is easier to read when details of one kind sit together.

Mixed upKept together
My kite is red. I fly it on the roof. It has a long tail. It flies very high. It has a yellow star.My kite is red, with a long tail and a yellow star. I fly it on the roof. It flies very high.

In the mixed-up version, the looks and the flying keep swapping places. In the kept-together version, all the looks come first, then all the flying. The reader finishes picturing the kite before watching it fly.

Notice three things. First, you do not need all three sides every time. A short paragraph might tell only what an animal looks like and what it does. What matters is that each sentence tells more about the one thing.

Second, the thing must stay the star. "My kite is red. My friend has a blue kite." The friend's kite is a new thing. It belongs in its own paragraph.

Third, facts about a whole kind of animal or object can be useful, but only when they tell more about your one thing. "Our hen Chiku lays an egg every morning, like most hens do." That fact still points at Chiku. In Practice, section 14, you will learn more about using facts and detail.

Picture holding a toy in your hand and turning it slowly. First you look at the front: its colour and shape. Then you turn it to see what it can do: the wheels spin, the door opens. Then you turn it once more and remember who gave it to you. A thing paragraph turns the thing in your hand, one side at a time, so the reader sees all of it.

In section 7 you built a paragraph about a place, walking the reader through it. This section builds a paragraph about one thing, turning it to show its different sides. Section 9 asks how long a paragraph should be: enough sentences to develop its one idea. In Practice, sections 12, 13 and 14, you will learn three ways to develop any topic sentence: with an example, a reason, and facts and detail.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes a fact about a whole kind of animal belongs in your paragraph, and sometimes it does not. Read this: "Our dog Rocky loves to dig. He digs holes all over the garden. Dogs have strong claws for digging. Last week he dug up Mum's tulips!" The third sentence is about all dogs, not just Rocky. So does it belong? It does. "Dogs have strong claws for digging" explains why Rocky is so good at digging. It points back at Rocky's love of digging. Now read this one: "Our dog Rocky loves to dig. He digs holes all over the garden. Dogs come in many different sizes." This fact is about all dogs too. But does it tell more about Rocky digging? No. Dog sizes have nothing to do with digging. It does not belong. So here is the test. When you write a fact about a whole kind of animal or object, ask: does this fact help explain my one thing and my topic sentence? If yes, keep it. If it is only a fact about the kind, with no link back to your thing, take it out.

Did you know that a sense of touch can tell you things your eyes cannot? If you close your eyes and hold an object, your fingers can tell you if it is smooth or rough, warm or cold, heavy or light, soft or hard. A shell can look smooth but feel bumpy. A blanket can look plain but feel wonderfully soft. Writers use this too. "The kitten's fur is softer than a cloud" tells the reader something no picture could. So when you write about a thing, try closing your eyes and touching it. You may find a detail nobody else would notice: the cool weight of a brass bell, or the rough paper of an old book. Details like these make a thing paragraph feel real.

A thing paragraph keeps one animal or object as the star. A second animal or object belongs in its own paragraph. You do not need every side in every paragraph. What matters is that each sentence tells more about the one thing. Keep details of one kind together, such as all the looks, then all the actions. A fact about a whole kind of animal or object belongs only when it helps explain your one thing and your topic sentence.

  1. Choose one animal or one object.
  2. Name it in your topic sentence and say one thing about it.
  3. Ask: what does it look like?
  4. Ask: what does it do, or what do I do with it?
  5. Ask: why does it matter?
  6. Keep details of one kind together.
  7. Use touch as well as sight if you can.
  8. Keep the thing as the star; leave out other things.
  9. Use a fact about the whole kind only if it explains your thing.
  10. Read it back and check every sentence tells more about the thing.
  11. If every sentence is about looks, add one about what it does or why it matters.
A paragraph about a thing names it, then tells more about it from different sides. "Grandpa's radio is his favourite thing. It is old and brown, with two round knobs. Every morning, he turns it on to hear the news. It has been on the kitchen shelf since before I was born." Three questions help: 1. What does it look like? 2. What does it do? 3. Why does it matter? Keep details of one kind together: all the looks, then all the actions. Keep the thing as the star. A friend's kite or an uncle's buffalo is a new thing for a new paragraph. A fact about all dogs or all kites belongs only if it helps explain your one thing. Next: how long should a paragraph be?

How long is a paragraph?

A paragraph is long enough when its one idea is developed. It ends when a new idea begins. No number of sentences is always right.

Judge by the idea, not by counting.

Five sentences, still too thin: "Our garden is lovely. It is a lovely garden. It is very nice. I like it a lot. It is so lovely."

Three sentences, just right: "Our garden is lovely. Roses climb the wall. A small pond shines in the middle."
What you noticeWhat it meansWhat to do
The idea is only said, not showntoo thinadd details that develop it
A new idea has started partwaya second idea has crept insplit it into two paragraphs
One idea, shown with detailsthe right lengthkeep it as it is

This is the fourth question of the Paragraph Check, said simply: has a new idea started, or is the one idea still thin? The answer tells you whether to add more, split it, or leave it.

Here is how the same idea can be too thin, just right, or too full.

LengthThe paragraphThe judgement
One sentenceMy dog is funny.too thin: the reader wants to know what he does
Three sentencesMy dog is funny. He chases his own tail. He sneezes when he sees a cat.the right length: the idea is shown
Six sentencesMy dog is funny. He chases his own tail. He sneezes when he sees a cat. My sister has a new bike. It is green. She rides it to school.too full: a second idea, the bike, has crept in

Notice three things. First, the six-sentence paragraph is not wrong because six is a big number. It is wrong because it holds two ideas. Split it, and you have two good paragraphs of three sentences each.

Second, a paragraph can be longer than three sentences and still be one idea. A paragraph about a busy market might need six or seven details to show it well. That is fine, as long as every sentence is about the market.

Third, in stories, writers sometimes use one very short paragraph on purpose, to make a moment stand out, like "Then the lights went out." Chapter 25 teaches how writers do that. In this chapter, your paragraphs will develop an idea, so they will usually have more than one sentence.

Picture a lunchbox. It should hold one meal, and enough of it to fill you up. If you open it and find one small grape, it is too thin: you are still hungry. If you open it and find your lunch and your brother's lunch squashed in together, it is too full: one of those lunches needs its own box. A good paragraph is a lunchbox with one meal, and enough of it.

In sections 1 to 8 you learned what goes into a paragraph and how to build one. This section asks when a paragraph is finished: when its one idea is developed, and before a new idea starts. Section 10 reviews everything in Discover. In Craft, section 29, you will judge harder cases of when a paragraph should split, and in Master you will decide when to develop a paragraph further.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes it is not clear whether a paragraph has grown a second idea, or is just giving more details about the first. Read this: "Our school has a big garden. Tomatoes grow near the gate. Beans climb the fence. Every Friday, our class waters the plants. Last year we won a prize for the garden." Is the prize a second idea? It is a new thing: an event, not a plant. But it is still about the school garden. It tells why the garden matters. Now read this: "Our school has a big garden. Tomatoes grow near the gate. Beans climb the fence. Our school also has a new computer room. It has twenty computers." The computer room is not part of the garden. It is a new idea, and it needs its own paragraph. Here is the test. Try naming the paragraph in a few words. For the first one, "our school garden" still fits every sentence, even the prize. For the second one, "our school garden" does not fit the computers. You would need a new name: "our school's garden and computer room". When you need two names, you need two paragraphs. So the question is never "How many sentences?" It is always "Does one name still fit?"

Did you know that paragraphs in newspapers are often much shorter than paragraphs in storybooks? Newspaper columns are narrow, so a long paragraph turns into a tall, thin block that is hard to read. Many newspapers use short paragraphs, sometimes only one or two sentences, so readers can move down the column quickly. Books for older readers often have longer paragraphs, because the page is wider and the reader can take in more at once. So the length of a paragraph depends partly on where it will be read. But in every one of them, the same rule holds: each paragraph is about one idea. Only the amount of room changes.

There is no number of sentences that is always right for a paragraph. Judge by the idea. A paragraph is too thin when its idea is said but not shown. It is too full when a second idea has crept in. A long paragraph can be fine if every sentence is about one idea. A short one can be fine if the idea is shown. In stories, writers sometimes use a one-sentence paragraph on purpose to make a moment stand out. Chapter 25 teaches that. In this chapter, a paragraph develops an idea, so it usually needs more than one sentence.

  1. Do not start by counting sentences.
  2. Say what the paragraph is about in a few words.
  3. Ask: has the idea been shown, or only said?
  4. If it has only been said, add details that show it.
  5. Ask: has a new idea started anywhere?
  6. If a new idea has started, split the paragraph there.
  7. Check that one short name still fits every sentence.
  8. Do not add empty sentences just to make it longer.
  9. Do not split one idea just because it is getting long.
  10. When the idea is shown and nothing new has crept in, stop.
  11. Remember that a short story moment on its own line is a writer's choice, taught in Chapter 25.
A paragraph is long enough when its one idea is shown. It ends when a new idea begins. There is no number of sentences that is always right. "Our garden is lovely. It is a lovely garden. It is very nice. I like it a lot. It is so lovely." Five sentences, still too thin. "Our garden is lovely. Roses climb the wall. A small pond shines in the middle." Three sentences, just right. Ask two questions: 1. Has the idea been shown, or only said? If only said, add more. 2. Has a new idea started? If so, split. If one short name fits every sentence, it is one idea, however long. If you need two names, you need two paragraphs. Think of a lunchbox: one meal, and enough of it. Next: a mixed review of everything in Discover.

First mixed review

The Paragraph Check asks four questions, in order. Then you decide what the paragraph needs.

The Paragraph Check, in simple words.

1. What is it about?
2. Does every sentence tell more about it?
3. Is the order sensible?
4. Has a new idea started, or is it too thin?

Then decide: keep it, add to it, reorder it, split it, or take out a sentence.
The questionIf the answer is noWhat to doThe section that taught it
1. What is it about?no one idea, or no topic sentencefind or write the ideasections 1 and 3
2. Does every sentence tell more about it?a sentence is about something else, or only repeatstake it out, or add real detailsections 4 and 5
3. Is the order sensible?the steps or the path are jumbledreorder the sentencessections 6 and 7
4. Has a new idea started, or is it too thin?two ideas, or the idea is not shownsplit it, or add moresections 2 and 9

This is the whole Paragraph Check. You will meet it again in every band, with longer paragraphs and harder choices, but the four questions will stay the same.

Here are five short paragraphs. Each one needs something different.

The paragraphThe question that failsWhat to do
My cat is grey. She sleeps a lot. My bike is new.2: the bike is about something elsetake out the bike sentence
We ate the cake. We baked the cake. We mixed the flour.3: the steps are back to frontreorder: mix, bake, eat
The fair was fun. It was really fun.4: too thin, nothing is shownadd what happened at the fair
The beach was lovely. The sand was soft. At home, Dad cooked fish. We ate it with rice.4: a new idea has startedsplit at "At home, Dad cooked fish."
Our garden is bright. Red roses grow by the wall. Yellow sunflowers stand by the gate.none: all four passkeep it as it is

Notice three things. First, each paragraph has only one problem here, so only one question fails. Real paragraphs can have more than one. Ask all four questions every time.

Second, the fix always matches the question. A stray sentence comes out. A jumbled order gets reordered. A thin paragraph gets more details. A paragraph with two ideas gets split.

Third, keep it as it is is a real answer. The garden paragraph passes all four questions. Changing it would only make it worse. A good checker knows when to leave a paragraph alone.

Picture a doctor checking a child at the clinic. She does not just look at one thing. She listens to the heart, looks in the ears, checks the throat and takes the temperature, every time, in the same order. Most days everything is fine, and she says so. When something is wrong, the check tells her exactly what. The Paragraph Check is your four-step check-up for every paragraph.

This section brings together everything in Discover: one idea, a topic sentence, sentences that add more, no strangers, a sensible order, a place paragraph, a thing paragraph and the right length. The Paragraph Check is the routine that holds them all. In Practice, the same four questions meet longer paragraphs, topic sentences that hide in the middle, and three new ways to develop an idea: examples, reasons, and facts and detail.

Here is a hard one, and it is fine to find it hard. Sometimes a paragraph has more than one problem. Read this: "We went to the park. We went home for lunch. We fed the ducks. My cousin has a new phone." Run the four questions. 1. What is it about? A trip to the park. That passes. 2. Does every sentence tell more about it? "My cousin has a new phone" is about something else. That fails. 3. Is the order sensible? They went home for lunch, and then fed the ducks? The ducks were at the park, so feeding them should come before going home. That fails too. 4. Has a new idea started, or is it too thin? Once the phone sentence is out, there is one idea, shown with details. That passes. So this paragraph needs two fixes. Take out the phone sentence. Move "We fed the ducks." before "We went home for lunch." The fixed paragraph: "We went to the park. We fed the ducks. We went home for lunch." If you had stopped after finding the stray sentence, you would have missed the order. That is why the check always has four questions, and why you ask all of them, even after you find one problem.

Did you know that pilots use a checklist before every flight, even after flying thousands of times? A pilot knows how to fly very well. But a checklist makes sure nothing is forgotten on a busy day: the fuel, the doors, the lights, the controls. Many doctors and nurses use checklists before operations for the same reason. The Paragraph Check is a checklist too. You might already be good at spotting a stray sentence. But on a busy day, or with a tricky paragraph, it is easy to forget to check the order or the length. Asking the same four questions every time means nothing slips past. So when you run the four questions, you are working the way pilots and doctors do: carefully, in order, every time.

Ask all four questions every time, even after you find one problem. A paragraph can have more than one. Match the fix to the question that failed: take out, add, reorder or split. Keep it as it is is a real answer when all four questions pass. These are the simple-word versions of the Paragraph Check. In later bands, the questions use bigger words, but they ask the same things.

  1. Read the whole paragraph first.
  2. Ask question 1: what is it about?
  3. Ask question 2: does every sentence tell more about it?
  4. Ask question 3: is the order sensible?
  5. Ask question 4: has a new idea started, or is it too thin?
  6. Give each question a tick or a cross.
  7. Do not stop after the first problem you find.
  8. Match the fix to the question that failed.
  9. If all four pass, keep the paragraph as it is.
  10. Read the fixed paragraph again to check it.
  11. Tell a stray sentence from a second idea: a stray comes out, a second idea gets its own paragraph.
  12. Praise yourself for saying no change is needed when all four questions pass.
The Paragraph Check has four questions: 1. What is it about? 2. Does every sentence tell more about it? 3. Is the order sensible? 4. Has a new idea started, or is it too thin? Then decide: Keep it, if all four pass. Take out a sentence, if one does not belong. Add to it, if it is too thin. Reorder it, if the order is wrong. Split it, if a new idea has started. A good topic sentence does not make the whole paragraph good. "Our school picnic was great fun" was a fine start, but the bus sentence was in the wrong place. A paragraph can have more than one problem, so ask all four questions every time. Next: Practice, starting with topic sentences that are not always first.

Building accuracy · ages 8–12

Finding the topic sentence

The topic sentence is the sentence every other sentence in the paragraph supports. It is often first, but it can sit in the middle or come last.

Find the job, not the position.

"Have you ever wondered why the monsoon matters so much? Farmers wait for it to water their rice. Cities need it to fill their lakes. For millions of people, the monsoon decides whether the year will be good or hard."

The question leads in. The farmers and the cities are details. The last sentence is the topic sentence.
Where it sitsWhat comes before itWhy a writer does this
firstnothingto state the point clearly at once, as in most explanations
in the middlea scene, a question or a surprising factto catch interest before giving the point
lastthe details or reasonsto build up to the point, so it lands as a conclusion

This sharpens the first question of the Paragraph Check, Topic: what is the one idea, stated in one sentence? The answer is the sentence the others support, wherever it sits.

Four kinds of sentence are often mistaken for the topic sentence. Learn to recognise them.

The impostorExampleWhy it is not the topic sentence
an opening questionHave you ever wondered why bees dance?it asks; the answer that follows is the idea
a scene-setting lead-inThe bell rang at eight.it sets the scene; it does not state what the paragraph shows
a striking detailSome festival kites are so big that several people hold one line.it is one example; it covers only itself
a closing repeatSo the monsoon really does matter.it repeats an idea already stated earlier in the paragraph

Notice three things. First, a question is never a topic sentence, because a topic sentence states an idea. But a question is often a sign that the topic sentence is coming soon: look for the sentence that answers it.

Second, the closing repeat is tricky. If a paragraph states its idea in the first sentence and says it again at the end, the first is the topic sentence and the last is a closing move. If the idea appears only at the end, the last sentence is the topic sentence.

Third, some paragraphs, especially in stories, never state their idea in one sentence at all. Every sentence carries it together. That is an implied topic, and you will study it in Craft, section 21. In this section, every paragraph has a stated topic sentence somewhere.

Picture a tent. The topic sentence is the central pole that holds it up; every other sentence is a rope pulling towards it. The pole is not always at the entrance. Sometimes you walk in past a flap or two before you reach it; sometimes it stands at the very back. To find it, do not look at the door. Follow the ropes: they all lead to the pole.

In Discover, section 3, you found topic sentences that mostly came first. This section finds them anywhere: first, middle or last, and separates them from lead-ins and repeats. Sections 12, 13 and 14 look at what the other sentences do: develop the topic sentence with examples, reasons and details. In Craft, section 21, you will meet paragraphs with no stated topic sentence at all.

Here is the case that takes judgement: two sentences that both look wide enough to be the topic sentence. Read this: "Our town's old library is more than a building full of books. On Saturday mornings, children crowd in for story hour. Retired teachers run free maths classes in the back room. In the evenings, people who have no internet at home come to use the computers. For many families, the library is the centre of the town." The first sentence says the library is more than a building full of books. The last sentence says it is the centre of the town. Both are wide. Which one do the details support? Test each one. Do story hour, maths classes and computers show that the library is "more than a building full of books"? Yes: each is something other than borrowing books. Do they show it is "the centre of the town"? Partly: they show many people use it, which leads towards that idea. The first sentence is the topic sentence. It makes the claim, and the three middle sentences prove it directly. The last sentence takes the idea one step further, as a closing move: from "more than books" to "the centre of the town". It is not a new idea, but it is not a plain repeat either. It is where the paragraph lands. When two sentences compete, ask which one the details prove most directly. That is the topic sentence. The other is usually a lead-in or a closing move.

Did you know that many newspaper reports deliberately put their most important point near the very top, while many feature articles do not? A common shape for news reports is sometimes called the inverted pyramid: the most important facts come first, and less important details follow, so a reader who stops early still gets the main point. In a news story, the main point of a paragraph is very often its first sentence. Feature articles and magazine pieces often work differently. They may open a paragraph with a scene, a person or a question to draw the reader in, and give the point a sentence or two later. So where you find the topic sentence can depend on the kind of writing you are reading. That is one more reason never to assume, and always to test.

The topic sentence can be first, in the middle or last. Test its job, not its position. A question is never the topic sentence, but the sentence that answers it often is. If an idea is stated early and repeated at the end, the early one is the topic sentence and the last is a closing move. Some paragraphs, especially in stories and descriptions, have no stated topic sentence; their idea is implied. Craft, section 21, teaches those. Every paragraph in this section has a stated one.

  1. Read the whole paragraph before you choose.
  2. Do not take the first sentence on trust.
  3. Rule out questions: they ask, they do not state.
  4. Notice scene-setting lead-ins and look past them.
  5. Rule out single details, however vivid.
  6. Test each candidate: do all the other sentences support it?
  7. Try "This paragraph shows that..." in front of each candidate.
  8. If two sentences compete, choose the one the details prove most directly.
  9. If the idea is stated early and repeated late, choose the early one.
  10. When you write, choose on purpose where your topic sentence goes, and why.
The topic sentence is the sentence every other sentence supports. It is often first, but it can sit in the middle or come last. First: the writer states the point at once. Middle: the writer leads in with a scene, a question or a fact, then states the point. Last: the writer builds up through details and lands on the point. Four impostors to rule out: 1. an opening question, which asks rather than states, 2. a scene-setting lead-in, 3. a single striking detail, 4. a closing repeat of an idea already stated. Test each candidate: could every other sentence be a reason, example or detail for this one? If two compete, choose the one the details prove most directly. Next: developing a topic sentence with an example.

Developing with an example

An example develops a topic sentence by showing one particular case where the claim is true: a person, a time, a place or an event the reader can picture.

The specifics make the example, not the label.

No example: "For example, she is very kind and generous to people."

A real example: "Last winter she knitted a sweater for every child on our street, eleven in all."

The second one has a time, a place, a number and an action.
Topic sentenceA vague exampleA specific example
Our town is friendly.People are nice to each other.When our car broke down on Market Road, three shopkeepers came out to push it.
Reading can change your day.Books are good for you.On a rainy Saturday, a book about a lost dog kept my brother off his tablet for four hours.
Small savings add up.Saving money is useful.Kabir saved his bus fare by walking for a term and bought his own cricket bat.

This sharpens the second question of the Paragraph Check, Development: does every other sentence add an example, a reason, a fact, a detail or a next step? A real example adds; a restatement labelled "for example" does not.

A strong example has three qualities, and a strong paragraph often adds a fourth step after it.

QualityThe question to askWeakStrong
specificCan I picture one particular case?Lots of animals help people.Our neighbour's guide dog, Bruno, leads her safely across Station Road every morning.
fittingDoes it prove exactly this claim?Claim: dogs are loyal. Example: dogs can smell very well.Claim: dogs are loyal. Example: our dog waited at the gate every evening until Papa came home.
explainedCan the reader see why it proves the point?(the example, then nothing)"No one had trained him to do it; he simply would not rest until the family was together."

Notice three things. First, a fitting example matters as much as a specific one. A dog's sense of smell is a real, specific fact, but it proves the dog has a good nose, not that it is loyal.

Second, the explaining sentence links the example back to the topic sentence. Without it, a reader may enjoy the example and still miss the point. With it, the paragraph closes the loop: claim, example, link.

Third, one well-chosen example is often stronger than three vague ones. Some paragraphs use two or three examples, each specific; that is fine. But piling up examples that are not specific only makes the paragraph longer, not more convincing. Words like "for example" and "for instance" help signal an example; Chapter 21 teaches those linking words. This section is about the example itself.

Picture a lawyer in a courtroom. She can say, "My client is honest," as many times as she likes; the judge will not be convinced. Then she holds up a receipt: on 3 March, the client found a wallet and returned it with every rupee inside. That receipt is an example. It is one particular piece of evidence the judge can see, and it does more than a hundred repeated claims.

In section 11 you found the topic sentence wherever it sits. This section begins three sections on how to develop it. An example shows one case. Section 13 gives a reason, which explains why the claim is true. Section 14 adds facts and detail, which make it exact and vivid. In Craft, many patterns - persuasive, definition, compare and contrast - use examples as their main support.

Here is the case that takes judgement: an example that is specific and true, but proves something slightly different from the claim. Read this: "Our school library is the most popular place in the school. Last month it bought two hundred new books, including a whole shelf of comics." The example is specific: last month, two hundred books, a shelf of comics. But does it prove the library is popular? No. It proves the library has many new books. A library could buy two hundred books and still stand empty. What would prove popularity? Something about people using it: "At lunch, every beanbag is taken, and there is a waiting list for the new comics." Now the example fits the claim exactly. The test is to put the claim and the example side by side and ask: if this example is true, must the claim be true, or at least much more likely? "Two hundred new books" does not make "popular" much more likely. "Every beanbag taken at lunch" does. This is the most common reason a paragraph with a real example still fails to convince: the example proves a neighbour of the claim, not the claim itself. When you choose an example, check it against the exact words of your topic sentence - here, "most popular" - not just its subject.

Did you know that people tend to remember a single, vivid story better than a set of figures? If you tell someone that a disease affects many people, they may forget it by tomorrow. If you tell them about one child, by name, who walked three kilometres to a clinic, they are far more likely to remember - and to care. This is one reason charities, newspapers and teachers so often tell the story of one person or one event. A specific example gives the mind something to hold on to. It is also a reason to be careful as a reader. One vivid example can make a claim feel more true than it really is. A good writer uses an example to show a claim; a careful reader asks whether the example is typical, or just memorable.

Writing "for example" does not make a sentence an example. The specifics - a person, a time, a place, an event - make it one. An example must fit the exact claim, not just its subject. Check it against the topic sentence's words. Add a sentence that links the example back to the claim when the connection might not be obvious. One vivid example can be persuasive even when it is not typical. Judging whether an argument's evidence is fair and sufficient belongs to Chapter 29; this section builds the paragraph's shape.

  1. Read the topic sentence and ask what would prove it.
  2. Choose one particular case: who, when, where, what happened.
  3. Include a detail the reader can picture, such as a name, a number or a place.
  4. Check that the example proves the exact claim, not a nearby one.
  5. Put the claim and the example side by side and test the fit.
  6. Add one sentence that links the example back to the claim.
  7. Prefer one well-developed example to a list of vague ones.
  8. Do not let "for example" stand in for a real case.
  9. If you use two or three examples, make each one specific.
  10. Read the paragraph as a doubter would: are you convinced?
An example develops a topic sentence by showing one particular case where the claim is true. No example: "For example, she is very kind and generous to people." A real example: "Last winter she knitted a sweater for every child on our street, eleven in all." A strong example is: 1. specific - a person, a time, a place, an event; 2. fitting - it proves the exact claim, not a nearby one; 3. explained - a sentence links it back to the claim. "For example" is a signal, not an example. The specifics do the work. Watch for the near miss: "two hundred new books" proves a big library, not a popular one. One well-chosen example often beats a list of vague ones. Next: developing with a reason.

Developing with a reason

A reason develops a topic sentence by answering 'why is this true?' with something new.

A reason must say something new.

A circle: "Every school should have a garden, because school gardens are a good thing to have."

A real reason: "Children who grow vegetables learn where food comes from."

The first ends where it started. The second tells the reader something they did not know.
Topic sentenceA circular reasonA real reason
Breakfast is important.because it is an important mealbecause after a night without food, the body and brain need energy to start the day
Our class should visit the museum.because a museum visit would be a good tripbecause we are studying the Mughals, and the museum has a room of Mughal coins and paintings
Libraries should open on Sundays.because Sunday opening is a good ideabecause many students only have time to read and study at the weekend

This sharpens the second question of the Paragraph Check, Development: does every other sentence add an example, a reason, a fact, a detail or a next step? A real reason adds; a circle only repeats.

Reasons and examples are both ways to develop a topic sentence, but they do different jobs.

SupportThe question it answersFor "Our town needs more cycle lanes."
a reasonWhy is this true?Cycle lanes keep riders away from fast traffic, so more people feel safe enough to cycle.
an exampleCan you show me a case?Last month, a boy on a bicycle was nearly hit at the Station Road junction.
a reason that fits a different claimWhy is something nearby true?Cycling is a fun way to spend a weekend.

Notice three things. First, a reason explains, while an example shows. A strong paragraph often uses both: the reason says why, and the example proves it happens. "Cycle lanes keep riders safe. Last month, a boy was nearly hit at Station Road, where there is no lane."

Second, the last row is a trap. "Cycling is fun" may be true, but it is a reason to cycle, not a reason the town needs lanes. A reason must support the exact claim.

Third, a paragraph can give more than one reason, and then their order matters. Many writers put the strongest reason last, so the paragraph builds; Craft will look at order of importance. Words like because, so and therefore help signal reasons; Chapter 21 teaches those linking words. This section is about the reason itself.

Picture a child who asks "why?" after everything you say. "We should leave early." Why? "Because we should go early." Why? You can feel that the second answer is no answer at all. Now try: "Because the bridge closes at six." The child nods: that is a reason. Every topic sentence has that curious child standing beside it. A real reason is the answer that makes the child stop asking.

In section 12 you developed a topic sentence with an example, which shows one case. This section adds a reason, which explains why the claim is true. Section 14 adds facts and detail, which make a claim exact and vivid. In Craft, sections 22, 23 and 24, reasons become the backbone of expository paragraphs, persuasive point-and-support paragraphs and cause-and-effect paragraphs.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a reason that sounds new but is really the claim again, dressed in different words. Read this: "Exercise is good for children because physical activity has a positive effect on young people's health." It sounds clever. The words are different: exercise becomes physical activity, good becomes positive effect, children becomes young people. But put the two halves side by side. "Exercise is good for children." "Physical activity has a positive effect on young people's health." They say the same thing. It is a circle wearing a disguise. How can you catch a disguised circle? Try this test. Swap each long phrase for a plain one. Physical activity is exercise. A positive effect is good. Young people are children. Now the reason reads: "Exercise is good for children because exercise is good for children." The circle is plain to see. A real reason survives the test. "Exercise is good for children because it strengthens their hearts and helps them sleep better." Swap the words for plain ones and you still have something new: hearts and sleep. So do not judge a reason by how grown-up it sounds. Judge it by whether it tells the reader anything the claim did not already say.

Did you know that very young children often go through a stage of asking "why?" again and again? Parents and teachers often notice it: "Why is the sky blue? Why does it rain? Why do I have to sleep?" Each answer seems to lead to another why. It can be tiring for the grown-ups, but it shows something important about how people think. Humans are not satisfied with being told that something is true; we want to know why. A claim without a reason leaves that question hanging. Good writers keep that question in mind. Every time they write a claim, they imagine a reader asking "why?", and they answer it before the reader has to ask.

The word 'because' only signals a reason. What follows it must say something new. A reason explains why; an example shows a case. Both develop a paragraph, and many paragraphs use both. A reason must support the exact claim, not a neighbouring one. Whether a reason is strong enough to win an argument is a question for Chapter 29, Argument and Persuasion. This section only asks whether a sentence really is a reason for the claim.

  1. Read the topic sentence and ask: why?
  2. Check that the reason says something new, not the claim again.
  3. Swap long phrases for plain ones to catch a disguised circle.
  4. Tell a reason, which explains, from an example, which shows.
  5. Check that the reason supports the exact claim.
  6. Do not offer a feeling, like 'I want it', as a reason for a general claim.
  7. Prefer one well-explained reason to several thin ones.
  8. Use an example after a reason when you want to prove it happens.
  9. If you give more than one reason, think about their order.
  10. Read it as a curious child would: does the answer stop the 'why?'
A reason develops a topic sentence by answering 'why is this true?' with something new. A circle: "Every school should have a garden, because school gardens are a good thing to have." A real reason: "Children who grow vegetables learn where food comes from." Four traps: 1. a circular reason, which restates the claim after 'because'; 2. a disguised circle, which uses grown-up words for the same idea; 3. an example called a reason, which shows a case but does not explain; 4. a reason for a different claim, like 'lunch is delicious' for a longer lunch break. Test a disguised circle by swapping long phrases for plain ones. A reason explains; an example shows. Many strong paragraphs use both. Next: developing with facts and detail.

Developing with facts and detail

Facts and details develop a topic sentence by making it exact and vivid: a number, a name, a colour, a sound, a smell, a texture.

Show it; do not just label it.

Labels: "The market was very busy and noisy and colourful. It was amazing."

Details: "Tomatoes sat in red pyramids beside heaps of green chillies. A fish seller banged his scale and shouted, 'Fresh from Mangalore!'"

The labels tell the reader what to feel. The details let them see and hear it.
A vague wordThe question to askA precise detail
lots of peopleHow many? Doing what?forty people queued for the ferry
a nice smellWhat smell, exactly?the smell of cardamom tea
a long wayHow far?fourteen kilometres
an old houseWhat shows it is old?paint peeling from the doors, a crack across the steps

This sharpens the second question of the Paragraph Check, Development: does every other sentence add an example, a reason, a fact, a detail or a next step? A precise detail adds; a stack of describing words does not.

Details come in two families. Most paragraphs use one more than the other, but strong ones often mix them.

FamilyWhat it addsExamplesWhere it works best
sensory detailwhat you see, hear, smell, taste and touchthe hiss of the pressure cooker; rough bark; salty airdescriptions and stories
factual detailnumbers, names, dates, measurements, placesbuilt in 1890; forty metres tall; on Station Roadexplanations and reports

Notice three things. First, a detail must serve the topic sentence. In a paragraph about how peaceful a garden is, "a lawnmower roared next door" is vivid but works against the claim. Choose details that show what the topic sentence says.

Second, precise does not mean invented. In a story, you can make up the colour of a door. In a report or an explanation, a number or a date must be true. If you are not sure of a figure, describe what you know instead of guessing.

Third, one sharp detail often does more than three general ones. "The tea was so hot it misted Grandpa's glasses" shows heat better than "The tea was very, very hot and boiling and steaming." In Discover, section 7, you used the senses to describe a place; this section uses them, and facts, to develop any kind of claim.

Picture two photographs of the same market. The first is out of focus: blurry shapes and smudged colours. You can tell it is a busy place, but nothing more. The second is sharp: you can read the price on a sign, count the chillies, see the steam above a pan. General describing words make the blurry photo. Precise details turn the lens until the picture is sharp.

In sections 12 and 13 you developed topic sentences with examples and reasons. This section adds the third tool: facts and detail, which make a claim exact and a description vivid. Section 15 checks that every detail stays on topic in longer paragraphs. Sections 16 and 17 put details in order, by time and by place. In Craft, definition and compare-and-contrast paragraphs rely heavily on precise detail.

Here is the case that takes judgement: when a detail is vivid and true but does not serve the topic sentence. Read this: "Our classroom is a calm place to work. Soft light comes through the tall windows. A clock ticks quietly above the board. Outside, a peacock screams from the neem tree every few minutes." The peacock is a wonderful detail: specific, sensory, real. Many writers would be tempted to keep it. But does it show that the classroom is calm? A peacock screaming every few minutes is the opposite of calm. There are two honest fixes. One is to leave the peacock out and keep the details that show calm. The other is to change the topic sentence so the peacock belongs: "Our classroom is calm inside, even when the world outside is noisy." Now the peacock shows the contrast, and it serves the idea. What you should not do is keep both the original topic sentence and the peacock, and hope the reader does not notice. A detail that fights the claim does not make a paragraph richer; it makes it confused. So choosing details is not just finding vivid ones. It is finding vivid ones that show what the topic sentence says.

Did you know that smell is often said to be one of the senses most closely tied to memory? Many people notice that a particular smell - a grandmother's cooking, a school corridor, rain on dry earth - can bring back a memory from years ago very suddenly, sometimes more strongly than a picture or a song does. The smell of rain on dry ground even has its own name in English: petrichor. It is a word made up by scientists in the twentieth century, built from Greek parts. This is one reason writers love smell details. A single line like "the kitchen smelled of cardamom and wood smoke" can make a reader feel they have been somewhere, because it reaches a part of memory that describing words cannot.

Describing words such as beautiful, nice and amazing are not wrong, but on their own they label rather than show. Use them sparingly, after the detail has done its work. In stories, invented details are part of the craft. In reports and explanations, facts must be true; do not make up a number. Every detail should serve the topic sentence. A vivid detail that fights the claim confuses the reader. Choosing precise words for each detail is word-level work; cutting needless words belongs to Chapter 20, Conciseness. This section is about which details a paragraph needs.

  1. Ask what someone would see, hear, smell, touch or count.
  2. Replace 'lots' and 'some' with a number or a name.
  3. Replace 'nice' and 'amazing' with what made it so.
  4. Use more than one sense in a description.
  5. Use facts - dates, places, measurements - in explanations.
  6. Check that every fact in a report is true.
  7. Choose details that show what the topic sentence claims.
  8. Leave out, or rethink, a vivid detail that fights the claim.
  9. Prefer one sharp detail to three general ones.
  10. Read it back and ask: can a stranger see it now?
Facts and details make a topic sentence exact and vivid. Labels: "The market was very busy and noisy and colourful. It was amazing." Details: "Tomatoes sat in red pyramids. A fish seller banged his scale and shouted." Two families of detail: 1. sensory - what you see, hear, smell, taste and touch; 2. factual - numbers, names, dates, places, measurements. Turn vague words into precise ones: lots of people becomes forty people; a nice smell becomes cardamom tea. Choose details that serve the claim. A screaming peacock does not show a calm classroom. In reports, facts must be true; in stories, details can be invented. Next: staying on topic in a longer paragraph.

Staying on topic

A topic sentence has a subject and a controlling idea. A sentence stays on topic only if it supports the controlling idea, not just if it mentions the subject.

Check the controlling idea, not just the subject.

Topic sentence: "Our school bus has become unreliable." Subject: the bus. Controlling idea: unreliable.

"The bus driver, Mr Gill, has driven for the school for twelve years." Right subject, different point. It breaks unity.
Topic sentenceSubjectControlling ideaA sentence on the subject but off the idea
The Diwali fair raises money for the village school.the Diwali fairraises money for the schoolThe fair has a giant wheel and a mehendi stall.
Grandma's garden feeds our family all year.Grandma's gardenfeeds the familyGrandma's garden won a prize for its roses.
Our town's river is becoming polluted.the riverbecoming pollutedChildren love to swim in the river in May.

This sharpens the second question of the Paragraph Check, Development, and its partner, unity: does every other sentence add support for the one idea? On a long paragraph, test each sentence against the controlling idea.

Drift is the hardest kind of disunity to spot, because no single sentence looks wrong next to its neighbour.

SentenceWhat it is aboutStill on the controlling idea?
Our town's library needs more space.the library needing spacetopic sentence
Students queue for the twelve computers every afternoon.crowding at the computersyes
The computers were given by a local company in 2019.where the computers came fromno: drifting
That company also built the new hospital.the companyno: far away
The hospital has a children's ward with painted walls.the hospitalno: a different topic entirely

Notice three things. First, each sentence follows the one before: computers, then who gave them, then that company, then its hospital. That chain is what makes drift feel natural. But by the end, the paragraph is about a hospital ward.

Second, the drift began at the third sentence, where the paragraph left 'needs more space' for 'where the computers came from'. That is where the cut should happen.

Third, compare the first and last sentences. If you cannot see how the last one supports the first, look back for where the paragraph turned. This check catches drift that sentence-by-sentence reading misses. Linking words between sentences can make a drift feel smooth; Chapter 21 covers those words. Here, the question is whether the ideas still serve the topic.

Picture a kite on a string. The topic sentence is the hand holding the string; the controlling idea is how long the string is. Each sentence is the kite moving in the wind. A little movement is fine, as long as the string holds. But if each gust carries the kite a bit further, and nobody pulls it back, the string snaps and the kite drifts over the rooftops. Unity is keeping every sentence within reach of the hand.

In Discover, section 5, you found the sentence that did not belong in a short paragraph. This section takes the same check into longer paragraphs, using the controlling idea rather than the subject, and catching drift. Sections 16 to 19 turn to order. In Craft, section 29, you will judge when a drift has grown into a second idea that needs its own paragraph; in Master, section 35, you will revise your own longer drafts for unity.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a sentence that seems to drift but actually supports the controlling idea. Read this: "The Diwali fair raises money for the village school. Every stall gives a tenth of its takings. The mehendi stall alone raised two thousand rupees. Last year, the money paid for new desks and a water filter." The third sentence is about a particular stall, and the fourth is about desks and a water filter. A quick reader might think the paragraph has drifted from the fair to furniture. But test each one against the controlling idea: raising money for the school. The mehendi stall's two thousand rupees is an example of the money raised. The desks and filter show where the money went for the school. Both support the idea. Now compare a real drift: "The mehendi stall is run by Mrs Kapoor, who learned the art from her mother in Jodhpur." That sentence is about the stall too, but it tells us about Mrs Kapoor's training, which does nothing to show the fair raising money. That is the stray. So the test is never 'does this sentence look like the others?' It is 'does this sentence help prove the controlling idea?' Sentences can travel far in subject - from a stall to a water filter - and still stay on the idea. Others can stay close in subject - the same stall - and leave the idea behind.

Did you know that 'digress', the word for wandering off the point, comes from Latin words meaning 'to step aside'? The Latin digredi was made from dis-, 'apart', and gradi, 'to step'. A digression is literally a step aside from the path. Some writers digress on purpose. A storyteller might pause to describe a side character, then say, "But I am getting away from my story," and return to the path. Done deliberately, a digression can be charming. But an unplanned digression inside a single paragraph usually just confuses the reader. The difference is control: a writer who digresses on purpose knows where the path is and comes back to it. A drifting paragraph has lost the path altogether.

Test every sentence against the controlling idea, not just the subject. A sentence can move far in subject and still support the idea, like desks bought with fair money. Do not cut it just because it sounds different. When you find a stray that is interesting, consider moving it to its own paragraph rather than deleting it. Craft, section 29, looks at when that is the right choice. Smooth linking words can hide a drift; Chapter 21 covers those words. Unity is about the ideas, whatever the links between them.

  1. Split the topic sentence into its subject and its controlling idea.
  2. Write both down before you check anything.
  3. Test each sentence against the controlling idea.
  4. Do not accept a sentence just because it mentions the subject.
  5. Do not cut a sentence just because it sounds different; test it first.
  6. Read the first and last sentences together to catch drift.
  7. When you find drift, look back for the sentence where it began.
  8. Cut or move the stray; keep the topic sentence as the test.
  9. If the stray is good material, give it its own paragraph.
  10. On your own drafts, check unity after every long paragraph.
A topic sentence has a subject and a controlling idea. A sentence stays on topic only if it supports the controlling idea. "Our school bus has become unreliable." Subject: the bus. Controlling idea: unreliable. "Mr Gill has driven the bus for twelve years." Right subject, different point: it breaks unity. Two hard cases: 1. Drift: a chain of sentences, each following the last, that ends far from the idea. Compare first and last; cut where it turned. 2. A sentence that sounds different but supports the idea, like desks bought with fair money. Keep it. Test against the idea, never just the subject. Next: order by time in a narrative paragraph.

Order by time

A narrative paragraph goes in the order things happened. The events themselves tell you the order; time words only help the reader follow it.

The events decide the order, not the time words.

Wrong, with time words: "First, Rohan crossed the finish line. Then the starter's whistle blew."

Right, with none: "The starter's whistle blew. Rohan sprinted down the last straight. He crossed the finish line."

A race starts before anyone finishes it.
The clue in the eventsExampleWhat comes first
cause before resultthe dam burst; the village floodedthe dam bursting
start before finishthe play began; the actors bowedthe play beginning
growth and changea seed, a shoot, a treethe seed
time of day or yeardawn, noon, dusk; spring, summerthe earlier time
ageas a child, as a teenager, as a grown-upthe younger age

This sharpens the third question of the Paragraph Check, Order: could a reader say why these sentences sit in this sequence, for this kind of writing? For a narrative, the reason is time.

Time words and the events should agree. When they do not, the paragraph is broken in one of three ways.

ProblemExampleFix
a sentence in the wrong placeThe bride arrived. The guests ate the wedding feast. The ceremony began.move the feast after the ceremony
a time word that points the wrong wayAfter the rain stopped, dark clouds gathered.clouds gather before rain, so reorder the events
a missing step that leaves a gapAnanya planted the seeds. She picked the ripe tomatoes.add the growing: she watered them for weeks

Notice three things. First, the missing step is an order problem too. If a reader jumps from planting to picking, they wonder what happened in between. A narrative needs enough steps for the time to make sense.

Second, some events happen at the same time, or in either order. If two friends arrive at a party, it may not matter who came first. Look for the events whose order is fixed, and place those first.

Third, stories sometimes step back in time on purpose, to tell something that happened earlier: "She remembered the day she first saw the sea." That is a deliberate move, clearly signalled, and it is not an order mistake. Words such as first, then, later and meanwhile signal time; Chapter 21 teaches them. In this section, the events lead.

Picture a row of dominoes. When the first one is pushed, each falls in turn, knocking down the next. You cannot have the fifth domino fall before the first has been pushed. A narrative paragraph is a row of dominoes: each event leads to the next. To check the order, ask which domino must fall first for the others to follow.

In Discover, section 6, you put the steps of a short story or a job in order. This section does the same for longer narrative paragraphs, using the events themselves - causes, starts, growth, times and ages - as clues. Section 17 orders a description by place instead of time. Section 18 orders an explanation from general to specific, and section 19 orders the steps of a process. In Master, section 36, you will revise jumbled paragraphs of every kind.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph where two different orders both seem to make sense, and only the events can decide. Read these sentences about one morning: "The power went out. Mum lit a candle. The milk in the fridge began to warm. Dad phoned the electricity office. The lights came back on at noon." Which sentences have a fixed place? The power going out must come first; everything else follows from it. The lights coming back on at noon must come last. The candle must come after the power cut, because Mum lights it only once the power has gone. But what about the milk warming and Dad's phone call? Both happen after the power cut and before noon. Could Dad have phoned before the milk began to warm? Yes. Could the milk have begun to warm first? Also yes. These two can swap without breaking the paragraph. So a good order puts the fixed events in their places - cut first, lights last, candle after the cut - and lets the free events sit in any sensible place between. If a test asks you to find the sentence that is out of order, it will be one with a fixed place, sitting where it cannot be: for example, "The lights came back on at noon" placed second. The skill is not finding one magic order; it is knowing which events are tied to others and which are free.

Did you know that the word 'chronological' comes from the name of time itself in Greek? The Greek word chronos means time. It gives us chronological, meaning in time order, and chronicle, an old word for a record of events written in the order they happened. It also gives us chronometer, an instrument for measuring time very precisely. Accurate chronometers once helped sailors work out how far east or west they had travelled at sea, because comparing the time on the ship with the time at home told them their position. So when you order a story chronologically, you are using a very old idea: that time is a line, and events can be placed along it, one after another.

Time words such as first, then and after that help the reader, but they do not make the order right. If a time word disagrees with the events, the events win. Some events can happen in either order. Place the fixed ones first, and let the free ones sit sensibly between. A missing step is an order problem too: add it so the time makes sense. Stories sometimes step back in time on purpose, clearly signalled, to tell a memory. That is a deliberate choice, not an error. Chapter 21 teaches the words that signal time.

  1. Read every sentence before you order them.
  2. Ignore the time words at first; look at the events.
  3. Put causes before their results.
  4. Put starts before finishes.
  5. Follow growth and change from small to big, young to old.
  6. Use times of day and seasons as clues.
  7. Place the events with fixed positions first.
  8. Let events that could happen in either order sit sensibly between.
  9. Check for a missing step that leaves a gap in time.
  10. Then check that the time words agree with the order.
A narrative paragraph goes in the order things happened. The events decide the order; time words only help the reader follow it. Wrong, with time words: "First, Rohan crossed the finish line. Then the whistle blew." Right, with none: "The whistle blew. Rohan sprinted. He crossed the line." Clues in the events: 1. cause before result; 2. start before finish; 3. growth and change; 4. times of day and year; 5. age. Three problems: a sentence in the wrong place, a time word pointing the wrong way, and a missing step. Some events are fixed; others can swap. A deliberate flashback is a choice, not a mistake. Next: order by place.

Order by place

A descriptive paragraph follows the reader's eye through a place, in one direction, one step at a time.

Choose a direction and keep to it.

Jumping: "The hills were blue. A bicycle leaned against our gate. Halfway down the lane, a tea stall steamed. Marigolds grew right by the gate."

One direction: "Marigolds grew right by our gate, where a bicycle leaned. Halfway down the lane, a tea stall steamed. Behind it all, the hills were blue."
DirectionWhere the reader standsGood for
near to farat one spot, looking outa view, a street, a landscape
outside to insidearriving at a buildinga house, a temple, a shop
top to bottomin front of something talla tree, a person, a tower
left to rightfacing a row of thingsa shelf, a market row, a stage
along a routewalking througha path, a corridor, a journey across a park

This sharpens the third question of the Paragraph Check, Order: could a reader say why these sentences sit in this sequence, for this kind of writing? For a description, the reason is the path the eye takes.

Choosing a direction is a judgement about the reader. The same place can be described in more than one good order.

PurposeA fitting directionWhy
welcome a visitor to Grandma's houseoutside to inside: gate, verandah, hall, kitchenit follows the visitor's arrival
show the view from a hilltopnear to far: the path at your feet, the village below, the river, the mountainsit follows the eye looking out
describe a tall banyan treetop to bottom, or bottom to topit follows the eye up or down the trunk
guide someone through a market lanealong a route: the entrance, the spice stalls, the fruit stalls, the far gateit follows the walk

Notice three things. First, no direction is the one correct direction for every place. A house can be described outside to inside for a visitor, or room by room along a corridor. What matters is choosing one that suits the reader and keeping to it.

Second, the worst problem is switching direction in the middle: starting near to far, then jumping back to something near. Each jump makes the reader rebuild the picture.

Third, place words such as beside, behind, above, beyond and at the far end help the reader follow the path. Chapter 21 teaches words that link sentences; in a description, these place words are your signposts, but the order of the details does the work. In Discover, section 7, you moved through a place in one direction; this section lets you choose the direction on purpose.

Picture a video camera on a slow track. A good description is one smooth shot: the camera glides from the gate to the hills, or up the trunk of a tree, without cutting back. A jumping description is a clumsy edit: gate, hills, gate, middle, hills, with the viewer trying to work out where they are. When you write, choose where the camera starts and which way the track runs, and do not cut.

In section 16 you ordered a narrative by time. This section orders a description by place. Section 18 orders an explanation from general to specific, and section 19 orders the steps of a process. Each kind of writing has its own natural order, and the Order question of the Paragraph Check asks you to name it. In Master, section 37, you will see how order shifts across genres.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a description where two directions are both possible, and the purpose decides. Imagine describing the old haveli in your town. You could go from the outside in: the carved wooden doors, the courtyard, the painted rooms around it, the dark storeroom at the back. Or you could go from the top down: the crumbling rooftop terraces, the balconies with their stone screens, the courtyard, the cool cellar below. Both are sensible. Which should you choose? Ask what the paragraph is for. If it is a guide for visitors arriving at the gate, outside to inside follows their footsteps. If it is a paragraph about how the building keeps cool in summer, top to bottom might be better, because it lets you show the hot roof first and the cool cellar last, which is the idea. So the direction is not just a tidy habit; it can serve the topic sentence. In the second version, the order itself carries the point: the further down you go, the cooler it gets. What you must not do is start outside to inside and then switch to top to bottom halfway. Choose the direction that serves the purpose, and keep to it until the paragraph ends.

Did you know that people who read a description often build a kind of map of the place in their minds? When a writer says "beside the gate" or "beyond the river", readers tend to place each thing in a picture they are building, rather than just remembering a list of words. That is why a description in a steady direction feels so much easier: each new piece slots into the map next to the last. Mapmakers have long faced the same problem on paper. A map has to show where everything is in relation to everything else, and old travellers' descriptions of routes, written as a series of 'then you pass, then you reach', were a kind of map in words. So when you order a description by place, you are drawing a map in your reader's mind, one landmark at a time.

No single direction is always right. Choose the one that suits the reader's point of view and the paragraph's purpose. Keep to one direction. Switching partway is the main problem to avoid. Place words like beside and beyond help the reader follow, but they cannot fix details that jump. Chapter 21 teaches linking words. A description can be ordered in other ways too, such as from the most striking detail to the least, when the purpose calls for it; Craft looks at order of importance.

  1. Decide where the reader is standing.
  2. Choose a direction that starts from there.
  3. Match the direction to the purpose, such as outside to inside for a visitor.
  4. Put the first detail where the eye would land first.
  5. Move one step at a time in that direction.
  6. Keep to the direction until the paragraph ends.
  7. Put each detail with its neighbours: the cat goes with the gate.
  8. Use place words like beside, behind and beyond as signposts.
  9. Trace the path with your finger to check for jumps.
  10. If two directions both work, choose the one that serves the topic sentence.
A descriptive paragraph follows the reader's eye through a place, in one direction. Directions: near to far, outside to inside, top to bottom, left to right, along a route. Jumping: hills, gate, lane, gate. One direction: gate, lane, fields, hills. To order a description: 1. Decide where the reader is standing. 2. Choose a direction that suits the purpose. 3. Move one step at a time. 4. Keep to it until the end. No direction is always right; a visitor suits outside to inside, a view suits near to far. The main mistake is switching direction partway. When two directions work, choose the one that serves the topic sentence, like top to bottom for a house that gets cooler further down. Next: general to specific.

General to specific

A general-to-specific paragraph narrows in steps, like a funnel: a broad claim, a narrower point, a particular example, a precise detail. Each sentence sits inside the one before it.

Narrow in steps.

"Many animals have clever ways of surviving the cold. Some grow thick coats in winter. The Arctic fox grows fur so dense it can sleep on snow. Its fur even covers the pads of its feet."

Many animals, then one way, then one animal, then one detail.
LevelHow wideExample
broad claimmany thingsFestivals bring communities together.
narrower pointone kind or one groupHarvest festivals are often shared by a whole village.
particular exampleone caseAt Pongal, families in our street cook sweet rice side by side.
precise detailone part of the caseThe pots boil over on purpose, as a sign of plenty.

This sharpens the third question of the Paragraph Check, Order: could a reader say why these sentences sit in this sequence, for this kind of writing? For many explanations, the reason is general to specific.

The funnel can also be turned upside down. Specific to general starts with a detail and widens to the big idea.

OrderShapeWhen writers use itExample opening
general to specificwide, then narrowmost explanations, reports and exam answersMany animals have clever ways of surviving the cold.
specific to generalnarrow, then wideto build up to a point, often in stories, speeches and some persuasive writingThe Arctic fox sleeps on snow.

Notice three things. First, specific to general is not a mistake when it is done on purpose. In section 11 you met paragraphs whose topic sentence came last, after the details had built up to it. That is the reverse funnel, and it can be very powerful.

Second, the reverse funnel needs the same discipline as the forward one. It must widen in steps. A paragraph that starts narrow, jumps wide, then drops back to a detail is not reversed; it is jumbled.

Third, which order to choose depends on the purpose. If the reader needs to understand the point first and then see evidence, as in most explanations, go general to specific. If you want the reader to discover the point by meeting the details first, go specific to general. Craft, section 22, builds the exam essay's body paragraph, which most often uses the forward funnel.

Picture a set of nesting boxes. The biggest box holds a smaller box, which holds a smaller one, which holds a tiny one at the centre. A general-to-specific paragraph opens the boxes in order: biggest first, then each one inside. If you hand the reader the tiny box first, they do not know which bigger box it came from. A good funnel opens the boxes one inside the other.

In sections 16 and 17 you ordered narratives by time and descriptions by place. This section adds the order most explanations use: general to specific, and its reverse. Section 19 orders the steps of a process. Section 20 mixes all the Practice moves. In Craft, section 22, the exam essay's body paragraph uses general to specific as its basic shape, and section 26 builds definition paragraphs the same way.

Here is the case that takes judgement: two sentences that seem to be at the same level, where one actually sits inside the other. Read these sentences: "Water is essential for life. Plants need water to make their food. All living things need water to survive. A tomato plant may wilt within a day without it." Which is the broadest? Both "Water is essential for life" and "All living things need water to survive" sound general. Are they the same level? Look closely. "All living things need water to survive" is really the same idea as "Water is essential for life", said a second time. That sentence does not narrow anything; it repeats the top level. One of them should go. Now put the others in order. "Plants need water to make their food" is narrower: one group of living things. "A tomato plant may wilt within a day without it" is narrower still: one plant. So the funnel is: "Water is essential for life. Plants need water to make their food. A tomato plant may wilt within a day without it." The test for any two sentences is: does one fit inside the other? Plants fit inside living things; a tomato fits inside plants. But "all living things" does not fit inside "life"; it is the same box. When two sentences are the same box, keep one.

Did you know that the way living things are named follows a kind of general-to-specific funnel? Scientists group living things in levels, from very broad groups down to individual kinds. A tiger, for example, belongs to the animals, then to the mammals, then to the cat family, then to the big cats, and finally to its own species. Each group sits inside the one above it, like nesting boxes. The idea of organising living things in nested groups is old. In the eighteenth century, the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus set out a system that gave each kind of living thing a two-part name, which scientists still build on today. So when you write a paragraph that narrows from all animals to one fox, you are using the same shape that scientists use to sort the whole living world.

General to specific means narrowing in steps, each sentence inside the one before, not just putting the general sentence first. Specific to general is a deliberate reverse for building up to a point. It is not a mistake when it widens in steps. Two sentences at the same level, saying the same thing, do not narrow; keep one. A paragraph that narrows and then jumps back to a new broad claim may hold two ideas. Craft, section 29, looks at when to split.

  1. Label each sentence by width: many things, one group, one case, one detail.
  2. Put the broadest claim first in an explanation.
  3. Narrow one level at a time.
  4. Check that each sentence fits inside the one before it.
  5. Move any detail that arrives before its example.
  6. Do not let two sentences repeat the same top level.
  7. Do not jump back up to a new broad claim.
  8. Use specific to general on purpose, to build up to a point.
  9. When you reverse the funnel, widen in steps.
  10. Choose the order by the purpose: explain first, or let the reader discover.
A general-to-specific paragraph narrows in steps, like a funnel. "Many animals have clever ways of surviving the cold. Some grow thick coats. The Arctic fox grows fur so dense it can sleep on snow. Its fur even covers its feet." Levels: a broad claim, a narrower point, a particular example, a precise detail. The test: does each sentence fit inside the one before it? Three problems: 1. a detail before its example; 2. two sentences at the same level, repeating; 3. a jump back up to a new broad claim. The reverse, specific to general, builds up to a point. It is a choice when it widens in steps. Choose by purpose: explain first, or let the reader discover. Next: explaining a process.

Explaining a process

A process paragraph names what is being made or done, gives each step in the order it must happen, and shows the result. Each step builds on the one before.

A list of steps, with a frame.

Frame: "Masala chai is made by simmering tea and spices together, so the flavours blend before the milk goes in."

Steps: boil water with ginger and cardamom; add tea leaves; pour in milk; strain.

Result: "It should be a warm, deep brown."
PartWhat it doesIn the chai paragraph
opening framenames the process and its purposeMasala chai is made by simmering tea and spices together.
steps in ordereach one possible only after the one beforeboil with spices, add tea, add milk, strain
reasons where neededexplain why a step comes where it doesso the spices have time to release their flavour
resulttells the reader what success looks likea warm, deep brown

This sharpens two questions of the Paragraph Check: Order (could a reader say why the steps sit in this sequence?) and Development (does every sentence add a next step?).

There are two kinds of process paragraph. Both follow the same rules.

KindQuestion it answersExample topicTypical opening
how toHow do I do it?making a paper boat, planting a saplingTo plant a sapling well, you need to prepare the soil first.
how it happensHow does it work?how rain forms, how a caterpillar becomes a butterflyRain forms when water vapour cools and gathers into drops.

Notice three things. First, the step that a reader most often finds missing is the one the writer does without thinking. When you know how to make chai, you forget to say 'bring the water to the boil first'. Read your own process as a stranger would.

Second, some steps can swap and some cannot, just as in a story. Ginger and cardamom can go in together in either order. But tea leaves cannot be strained out before they are added. Find the fixed steps first.

Third, a short reason after a step - 'so the spices release their flavour', 'so the soil does not dry out' - helps the reader understand why the order matters, and makes the paragraph an explanation rather than a list. Words such as first, next and finally help signal the steps; Chapter 21 teaches those words. In this section, the steps themselves must be in the right order.

Picture building a tower of blocks. You cannot place the roof before the walls, or the walls before the base. Each block rests on the ones already placed. A process paragraph is that tower: each step rests on the steps before it. If you skip a block in the middle, everything above it wobbles; if you place one too early, it has nothing to rest on.

In section 16 you ordered events in a story by time. A process is ordered by time too, but with a difference: in a process, each step depends on the one before, so the order is usually fixed, and a missing step stops everything. This section adds the frame - what is being made, and what the result is - that turns a list into an explanation. Section 20 mixes all the Practice moves. In Craft, section 24, cause-and-effect paragraphs use the same chain of 'this leads to that'.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a natural process where the steps form a cycle, so it is not obvious where to begin. The water cycle has no first step in nature: water evaporates, forms clouds, falls as rain, flows to the sea and evaporates again. So where should a paragraph start? A cycle needs an entry point that the reader can understand without the steps before it. Most writers start where the change is easiest to picture: the sun warming water in the sea and turning it into vapour. From there, each step builds on the one before: the vapour rises and cools; it gathers into droplets that form clouds; the droplets grow heavy and fall as rain; the rain runs into rivers and back to the sea. Now the end: a cycle paragraph should close by showing the return to the start - "and the sun warms it again" - so the reader sees the loop. Two things would break it. Starting in the middle, with "Rain falls from the clouds", before the reader knows how clouds formed. And jumping a step, from vapour straight to rain, missing the cooling and the clouds. So even in a cycle, the rule holds: each step must rest on the ones already explained. You choose the entry point; after that, the order is fixed.

Did you know that the word 'recipe' once meant an instruction written by a doctor? It comes from Latin, where recipe meant 'take!' - the first word of many old medical instructions, telling the person preparing a medicine what to take and mix. Over centuries, the word came to mean any set of instructions for making food. You can still see a trace of it in pharmacies, where the symbol Rx, often used for a prescription, is traditionally linked to that old Latin instruction. So every recipe is a kind of process paragraph with a long history: a list of steps, in order, telling someone exactly what to take and what to do with it.

A process paragraph needs a frame: name the process at the start and show the result at the end. In a process, most steps depend on the one before, so the order is usually fixed. Some steps can swap; find the fixed ones first. A cycle has no natural start; choose a clear entry point, then keep the order fixed. Words like first, next and finally help signal steps, but they cannot fix steps in the wrong order. Chapter 21 teaches those words.

  1. Name the process and its purpose in the first sentence.
  2. Decide what the result should be.
  3. Work backwards from the result to find which steps depend on which.
  4. Put the steps in the order they must happen.
  5. Check each step: could it be done with only the earlier steps done?
  6. Look for the step you do without thinking; it is often missing.
  7. Add a short reason where the reader needs to know why the order matters.
  8. Keep out steps from a different process.
  9. End with what the result should look like.
  10. For a cycle, choose a clear entry point and show the loop at the end.
A process paragraph explains how something is done or how something happens. It has three parts: 1. a frame that names the process and its purpose; 2. the steps, in the order they must happen, each building on the one before; 3. the result, so the reader knows what success looks like. A bare list is not enough: "Boil the water. Add the tea. Add the milk." does not say what is being made or why. Check each step: could I do this now? If not, a step is missing or out of place. The step a writer does without thinking is the one most often missing. A cycle needs a clear entry point and an ending that shows the loop. Next: explain your evidence, a mixed review of Practice.

Explain your evidence

A judgement about a paragraph is complete when it names the question that caught the problem, points to the evidence, and chooses the fix that matches.

Diagnose, then fix.

"Our school should have a longer lunch break. A longer break would be a good thing. Students would like it a lot."

Question: Development. Evidence: every sentence after the first only repeats it. Fix: add a reason or a fact.
QuestionTypical evidence of a problemMatching fix
1. Topicno sentence or shared idea says what it is about; a question or scene is mistaken for the pointstate or sharpen the one idea
2. Developmenta sentence only repeats the claim; a circular reason; a vague example; a stray that mentions the subjectadd a real example, reason or detail; cut the stray
3. Ordera result before its cause; a jump in a description; a detail before its example; a step that cannot happen yetmove the sentence to its place
4. Boundarya second idea with its own sentences; or one idea asserted but never shownsplit it, or develop it further

This is the whole Paragraph Check in its full form. Then decide: keep it, develop it, reorder it, or split it.

The same symptom can come from different questions. That is why the evidence matters.

SymptomQuestion 2: DevelopmentQuestion 3: OrderQuestion 4: Boundary
"This sentence feels wrong here."it is about something else: cut itit belongs, but in a different place: move itit starts a new idea with its own sentences: split
"This paragraph feels thin."its supporting sentences only repeat: replace them with real support-its one idea is asserted but never shown: develop it further

Notice three things. First, a sentence that 'feels wrong' might need cutting, moving or splitting, depending on which question it fails. Ask: is it about the idea at all? If not, cut it. If it is, does it sit in the right place? If not, move it. Does it bring a new idea with sentences of its own? Then split.

Second, Development and Boundary both deal with thin paragraphs, from two sides. Development asks whether each sentence adds something; Boundary asks whether the idea, overall, has been shown enough. A paragraph can pass Development sentence by sentence and still be too thin as a whole.

Third, a paragraph that passes all four questions needs no change, however plain it is. Saying 'keep it' with your evidence - one idea, each sentence adds, a sensible order, nothing extra - is as much a judgement as any fix.

Picture a car mechanic with a checklist: engine, brakes, lights, tyres. A strange noise could come from any of them. A good mechanic does not just say 'it sounds bad'; she checks each system and says 'the brakes - this pad is worn through'. Then she replaces the pad, not the engine. The Paragraph Check is your four-system checklist, and naming the system and the worn part is what lets you fix the right thing.

This section ties together the whole Practice band: topic sentences anywhere (section 11), development by example, reason and detail (12 to 14), unity on the controlling idea (15), and order by time, place, general to specific and process (16 to 19). In Craft, the same four questions meet new patterns - implied topics, persuasive and expository paragraphs, cause and effect, comparison, definition, introductions and conclusions - and the Boundary question becomes the judgement of when to split.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph with a problem that two questions seem to catch, where the evidence decides which one is real. Read this: "The monsoon changes life in our village. Children row to school in tin tubs. Farmers plant rice in the flooded fields. The monsoon usually begins in June. Shops sell umbrellas and plastic sheets." The fourth sentence, about when the monsoon begins, feels out of place. Which question catches it? Could it be Order? Perhaps the timing belongs at the start, as a lead-in: "The monsoon usually begins in June." Then the topic sentence, then the changes. If so, it is an Order problem: move it. Could it be Development? Perhaps the timing simply does not show the monsoon changing life. If so, it fails the controlling idea: cut it. How do you decide? Test both fixes. Moved to the start, does the timing help the paragraph? It sets the scene a little, but the topic sentence still has to come right after, and the date adds nothing to 'changes life'. Cut, does the paragraph lose anything? No: every remaining sentence shows a change. So the stronger diagnosis is Development: the sentence does not support the controlling idea. The evidence is that it gives a date, not a change, and that nothing is lost when it goes. When two questions both seem to apply, try each fix in your head. The question whose fix makes the paragraph clearly better is the real diagnosis.

Did you know that 'diagnosis' comes from Greek words meaning 'to know apart' or 'to tell apart'? The Greek dia- means 'through' or 'apart', and gnosis means 'knowing'. A diagnosis is knowing one condition apart from others that look similar. That is exactly the skill in this section. A weak sentence can look the same whether it needs cutting, moving or splitting. The Paragraph Check lets you tell those problems apart. The same Greek root gnosis appears in other English words about knowing, such as 'agnostic', describing someone who says a thing cannot be known. So when you name the question that caught a problem, you are making a true diagnosis: knowing this problem apart from the others.

Name the question and point to the evidence; a verdict without them cannot guide a fix. The same symptom can come from different questions. Test the possible fixes to decide. One stray sentence is cut; a new idea with its own sentences is split. Development and Boundary both judge thinness, from different sides. Keep it as it is, with evidence, is a real verdict. Whether an argument's reasons are strong enough to persuade is a question for Chapter 29; the Paragraph Check judges the paragraph's architecture.

  1. Ask all four questions in order, every time.
  2. Give each question a verdict: passes or fails.
  3. For each failure, point to the exact sentence or gap.
  4. Name the question in your explanation, for example 'Order'.
  5. Choose the fix that matches the question.
  6. Cut a stray; move a misplaced sentence; split a second idea; develop a thin one.
  7. When two questions seem to apply, test each fix in your head.
  8. Keep a paragraph that passes all four, and say why.
  9. Use the full words: Topic, Development, Order, Boundary.
  10. When giving feedback, name the question and the sentence, not just 'weak'.
The full Paragraph Check: 1. Topic: what is the one idea? 2. Development: does every other sentence add an example, a reason, a fact, a detail or a next step? 3. Order: could a reader say why the sentences sit in this sequence? 4. Boundary: has a second idea crept in, or is the idea still thin? Then decide: keep it, develop it, reorder it, or split it. A complete judgement names the question, points to the evidence, and matches the fix. "A longer break would be a good thing" after "Our school should have a longer lunch break" fails Development: it only repeats. Fix: add a reason. The same symptom can need cutting, moving or splitting. Test the fixes to choose. Keep it, with evidence, is a real verdict. Next: Craft, beginning with paragraphs that never state their idea.

Writing with intent · ages 12–16

When no sentence states it

An implied topic is an idea that every sentence carries together, though no single sentence states it. An implied topic is not a missing one.

Name what the details add up to.

"Ammachi's slippers sat by the door, one turned on its side where she had kicked it off in a hurry. On the stove, the milk had boiled over. Her crossword lay unfinished."

This paragraph shows that Ammachi left suddenly, and that something is wrong.
Paragraph typeIs the idea stated?Do the details point one way?Verdict
stated topicyes, in one sentenceyesa topic sentence carries the idea
implied topicnoyesthe details carry the idea together
no topicnono, they scattera list, not a paragraph

This sharpens the first question of the Paragraph Check, Topic: what is the one idea - stated in one sentence, or carried by all of them together? Stance 2 of this chapter: an implied topic is standard, not an error.

Implied topics are most common in some kinds of writing and rare in others.

Kind of writingImplied topicsWhy
stories and memoirscommonthe reader discovering a feeling is more powerful than being told
descriptionscommona dominant impression, such as menace or calm, can be built from details alone
exam essays and reportsrarethe reader, often a marker, needs the point stated so it cannot be missed
persuasive writingoccasionala story may lead in, but the point is usually stated soon after

Notice three things. First, naming an implied idea takes judgement. Two careful readers may phrase it differently - "Ammachi left suddenly" or "the house shows signs of an emergency" - but both should be supported by every detail. If your sentence leaves out a detail or contradicts one, refine it.

Second, an implied topic must still be unified. Every detail must point the same way. A cheerful detail dropped into the Ammachi paragraph - "a bird sang happily on the sill" - would muddy the feeling, unless the writer meant it as a contrast.

Third, choosing to imply rather than state is a decision about genre and reader, not a way of avoiding a topic sentence. In an exam essay, Craft section 22 will ask you to state the claim. The Paragraph Check never ranks the two choices; it asks which suits the job (stance 7).

Picture a dot-to-dot puzzle without numbers. Each detail is a dot. A careless arrangement of dots makes nothing, however many there are. But when a writer places the dots carefully, the reader's eye joins them and sees a shape - a house left in a hurry, a calm morning, a frightened child - though no line has been drawn. An implied topic is the shape the dots make. Your job as a reader is to see it; your job as a writer is to place the dots so it can be seen.

In Discover and Practice, almost every paragraph had a stated topic sentence, first, in the middle or last. This section adds the paragraph whose idea is never stated. Section 22 then turns to the opposite: the exam essay's body paragraph, where the claim must be stated plainly. Later Craft sections build patterns - persuasive, cause and effect, comparison, definition - that usually state their idea, and in Master, section 39, you will read a published paragraph closely for how its idea is carried.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph where one detail seems to point the other way, and you must decide whether it is a contrast that sharpens the idea or a stray that breaks it. Read this: "The ward was quiet except for the machines. Ravi's father lay with his eyes closed, the tube taped to his hand. Outside the window, children were playing cricket in the hospital car park, shouting at every boundary. Ravi watched them for a long time without moving." The implied idea is something like "Ravi is frightened and alone with his father's illness." But the cricket - shouting children, boundaries, play - is cheerful. Does it break the paragraph? Test it. Remove the cricket and the paragraph still shows the quiet ward and the illness. Put it back and something changes: the ordinary, noisy life outside makes the stillness inside sharper, and Ravi watching "without moving" shows how far he is from that world. The contrast serves the idea. It is not a stray; it is a deliberate counterpoint. Now change it: "Outside, children played cricket. Ravi's school was hosting a cricket tournament next month." The tournament adds nothing to Ravi's fear and points to a different subject altogether. That is a stray. The test is whether the odd detail sharpens the implied idea or pulls the reader away from it. A contrast is tied to the idea - here, by Ravi watching it. A stray is tied to nothing.

Did you know that a famous piece of advice about writing is often summed up in three words: show, don't tell? The idea is that a writer should let readers experience a feeling or an idea through details and actions, rather than simply announcing it. Instead of writing "she was nervous", a writer might show her twisting a ring round and round her finger. The Russian writer Anton Chekhov is often linked with this idea; a line commonly attributed to him advises not telling the reader that the moon is shining, but showing the glint of light on broken glass. The exact wording is uncertain and is probably a later summary of advice found in his letters, but the idea has shaped how many writers think about description. An implied topic is 'show, don't tell' at the level of the whole paragraph: the details show the idea, and no sentence tells it.

An implied topic is standard, not an error, as long as every detail points to one idea. A paragraph whose details scatter has no topic, stated or implied. That is a list, not a paragraph. Two careful readers may word an implied idea differently; both wordings should fit every detail. In exam essays, reports and most explanations, state the idea. Implied topics suit stories, memoirs and descriptions. Figurative language that a paragraph uses to carry its idea belongs to Chapter 26; this section looks at how the paragraph is built.

  1. Read the whole paragraph before naming its idea.
  2. Ask what feeling, judgement or point the details add up to.
  3. Write the idea yourself: "This paragraph shows that...".
  4. Check your sentence against every detail.
  5. If a detail does not fit, refine your sentence or judge the detail.
  6. Do not name a single detail as the idea.
  7. Do not name the setting as the idea.
  8. Tell a deliberate contrast from a stray: is the odd detail tied to the idea?
  9. Do not mistake a scattered list for an implied topic.
  10. When you write, imply in stories and descriptions; state in essays and reports.
An implied topic is an idea every sentence carries together, though no sentence states it. It is not a missing topic. Ammachi's kicked-off slipper, the spilled milk and the unfinished crossword all say 'something is wrong', without anyone saying it. To read an implied topic: 1. Read it all. 2. Ask what the details add up to. 3. Write it: "This paragraph shows that..." 4. Test it against every detail. A paragraph whose details scatter has no topic at all: a list, not a paragraph. An odd detail may be a deliberate contrast that sharpens the idea, or a stray that breaks it. Ask whether it is tied to the idea. Imply in stories and descriptions; state in essays and reports. Next: the exam essay's body paragraph.

Explaining an idea

An expository paragraph explains one claim. It states the claim, develops it, and lets nothing else in.

Claim, development, close.

"Forests protect the soil they grow in. The roots of trees bind the earth together, so heavy rain cannot easily wash it away. ... Keeping a forest standing, then, keeps the land beneath it in place."

Every sentence is about forests and soil. Nothing else gets in.
PartWhat it doesForest example
claimstates the one ideaForests protect the soil they grow in.
evidencegives a fact, example or detailThe roots bind the earth together.
explanationshows how the evidence supports the claim...so heavy rain cannot easily wash it away.
closedraws the point together, adds nothing newKeeping a forest standing keeps the land in place.

This is the Paragraph Check at work. Topic: one claim, stated. Development: every sentence adds evidence or explanation. Order: general claim first, then the support. Boundary: anything off-claim goes.

Development in an expository paragraph has two jobs, and both matter.

JobQuestion it answersWithout it
evidenceHow do you know?the claim is asserted but not shown
explanationHow does that prove it?the facts sit there and the reader must make the link
close (optional)So what does it add up to?the paragraph stops rather than finishes

Notice three things. First, evidence alone is not enough. "Roots bind the earth together" is a fact; "so heavy rain cannot easily wash it away" is the explanation that connects it to the claim. Practice section 20 asked you to explain your evidence in a single answer; here the whole paragraph does it.

Second, the close is not a copy of the claim. "Forests protect the soil" repeated as "So forests protect soil" adds nothing. A good close draws the point together - "Keeping a forest standing keeps the land beneath it in place" - or shows why it matters.

Third, an expository paragraph is not a persuasive one. It explains how or why something is so; it does not argue a reader into a view. Section 23 builds the persuasive paragraph's shape, and Chapter 29 judges whether an argument is strong. The linking words that join your sentences, such as so and then, belong to Chapter 21; this section owns the claim they serve.

Picture a lamp post on a dark street. The claim is the lamp: it sits at the top and lights everything below it. Each sentence after it is something standing in the circle of light - a fact, an example, an explanation - visible because the lamp shines on it. A sentence about something else stands outside the circle, in the dark, where the reader cannot see why it is there. Your job is to keep everything inside the light, and to switch the lamp on first.

In Practice you developed a topic sentence with an example, a reason or a fact, and you explained your evidence in single answers. Section 21 showed paragraphs that leave their idea unstated. This section turns to the paragraph that must state it: the expository paragraph, the body paragraph of an essay. Section 23 adds a persuasive shape built on the same bones - point, support, link back. In Master, section 32, you will build this paragraph under a stated topic and word limit.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a sentence that is true, on the topic, and still does not belong. Read this, written for "Why is sleep important for students?": "Sleep helps students remember what they learn. During sleep, the brain sorts the day's experiences and strengthens many of the memories it keeps. A student who sleeps well after studying is more likely to recall the work the next day. Many students also find that sleep improves their mood. A good night's rest, then, is part of learning itself." The sentence about mood is true for many people, and it is about sleep and students. Is it a stray? Run the Boundary question. The claim is not "sleep is good for students". It is narrower: "sleep helps students remember what they learn". Mood is a second benefit, not evidence for memory. Inside this paragraph it is off-claim, however true it is. That does not mean the mood sentence is wasted. It may deserve its own paragraph, with its own claim: "Sleep also affects how students feel." The fix is not to cut a good idea from the essay, but to move it out of the paragraph that is explaining something else. The test is never "is it true?" or "is it on the topic?" It is "does it support this claim?"

Did you know that the paragraph is older than the paragraph mark? The word paragraph comes from Greek words meaning "written beside". In ancient manuscripts, scribes did not indent new paragraphs. Instead, they placed a mark in the margin, beside the line, to show the reader that a new section of thought was beginning. Over many centuries, different marks were used. One of them became the pilcrow, the symbol ¶ that you may still see in word-processing programs when you show hidden formatting. The idea behind the mark has not changed: a new paragraph signals a new unit of thought. The expository paragraph is that idea at its strictest - one claim, one unit, and nothing written beside it that does not belong.

An expository paragraph usually states its claim first, but a writer may lead in with a short question or example before stating it. The claim must still be stated. The close is optional in a short paragraph. If the last piece of evidence lands the point, stop there. A true, interesting sentence can still be off-claim. Move it to its own paragraph rather than losing it. Expository paragraphs explain; they do not argue. Persuasive structure is section 23, and the strength of an argument belongs to Chapter 29. The words that link sentences belong to Chapter 21.

  1. Say your claim in one sentence before you write: "This paragraph explains that...".
  2. State the claim in the first sentence, or soon after a short lead-in.
  3. Make the claim narrow enough to explain fully in one paragraph.
  4. Give evidence: a fact, an example or a detail.
  5. Explain how each piece of evidence supports the claim.
  6. Ask of every sentence: does it support this claim?
  7. Move a true but off-claim sentence to its own paragraph.
  8. Do not repeat the claim in new words and call it development.
  9. Close by drawing the point together, not by adding a new idea.
  10. Leave arguing to persuasive writing; an expository paragraph explains.
An expository paragraph explains one claim. Its shape: 1. Claim - the one idea, stated. 2. Evidence - a fact, an example, a detail. 3. Explanation - how the evidence supports the claim. 4. Close - draws the point together; adds nothing new. Nothing extra gets in, however true or interesting. The tigers do not belong in the soil paragraph. The test for every sentence is not "is it true?" or "is it on the topic?" but "does it support this claim?" A claim repeated in new words is not developed. Evidence without explanation leaves the reader to do the work. Next: the persuasive paragraph's shape - a point, its support, and a link back.

A point, and its support

A persuasive paragraph has a shape: a point, support for it, explanation, and a link back. It is built, not shouted.

Point, support, link back.

"Our school should keep the library open at lunchtime. Many pupils have nowhere quiet to read ... Keeping the library open at lunch would turn an empty room into the school's busiest place for learning."

The first sentence asks; the last sentence asks again, sharper.
PartWhat it doesLibrary example
pointstates what the writer wants the reader to acceptThe library should open at lunchtime.
supportgives a reason, fact or example for itMany pupils have nowhere quiet to work.
explanationshows how the support backs the pointAn open library would give them a calm room.
link backreturns to the point, sharpenedAn empty room would become the busiest place for learning.

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: one point, stated. Development: support and explanation for that point only. Order: point, support, link. Boundary: a complaint about something else starts a different paragraph.

Many classrooms teach this shape with a short memory aid. One common version is PEEL: Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. Another is PEE, without the link. The letters vary; the bones do not.

Shape questionWhat a weak paragraph doesWhat a built paragraph does
Is there one point?lists several complaintsstates one thing it wants
Does the support back that point?gives reasons for other pointsgives reasons for this one
Is the support explained?leaves the reader to connect itshows how it backs the point
Does it link back?stops, or drifts to a new complaintreturns to the point, sharper

Notice three things. First, the link back is not a copy of the point. "So the library should open at lunch" repeats; "an empty room would become the busiest place for learning" returns to the point and lifts it.

Second, this section judges shape, not strength. A paragraph can be perfectly built around a weak reason, or badly built around a strong one. Whether the reason is good, fair, or answers the other side is Chapter 29's question; here the question is whether the paragraph is built so a reader can follow it.

Third, the persuasive shape shares bones with the expository paragraph of section 22. The difference is the job: exposition explains how something is; persuasion asks the reader to accept a view or take an action.

Picture a bridge across a river. The point is the far bank, where you want the reader to end up. Each piece of support is a pillar standing in the water; explanation is the deck laid across the pillars so the reader can walk on it. The link back is the last plank that touches the far bank. A pillar placed in a different river, however strong, holds up nothing. A paragraph that shouts but has no pillars leaves the reader on the near bank, hearing you call from across the water.

Section 22 built the expository paragraph: claim, evidence, explanation, close. This section uses the same bones for a different job: moving a reader toward a view. Sections 24 to 26 add development patterns - cause and effect, comparison, definition - that either kind of paragraph can use. In Master, section 37, you will see how the same moves shift between persuasive, narrative and report writing, and Chapter 29 will judge the arguments themselves.

Here is the case that takes judgement: two reasons that are both for the point, but pull the paragraph in two directions. Read this: "Our town should build a footbridge over the highway near the school. Children crossing the road at rush hour risk being hit by fast traffic. A bridge would let them cross above the cars. A bridge would also be a fine landmark, and could be painted with a mural by local artists. The town should build the bridge before another school year begins." Both safety and the mural are reasons to build the bridge. Is the mural off-point? Run the Boundary question. The point is "build a footbridge". Safety backs it directly and is explained. The mural backs it too, but it changes what the paragraph is about: from protecting children to decorating the town. The reader's attention splits. There are two sound fixes. The writer can cut the mural and keep one focused reason, or move it to a second paragraph: "A bridge would also give the town something to be proud of." Then each paragraph has one point of support, explained. The test is not "is this a reason for the point?" It is "does this paragraph still have one line of support a reader can follow?" Many reasons can serve one point; one paragraph usually carries one line of them.

Did you know that the study of persuasive structure is more than two thousand years old? In ancient Greece and Rome, rhetoric - the art of persuasive speaking - was a central school subject. Teachers broke a speech into parts, each with its own job. The Roman writers on rhetoric, such as Cicero and Quintilian, described parts such as an opening that wins the listener's attention, a statement of the case, the proof, and a closing that sums up and moves the audience. The names and number of parts varied from teacher to teacher. But the idea will feel familiar: say what you want, support it, and return to it at the end. The persuasive paragraph is that ancient shape in miniature - one point, its proof, and a link back.

The point usually comes first, but a short story or question may lead in before it, as in an expository paragraph. A persuasive paragraph usually carries one line of support. A long piece of persuasion has several paragraphs, each with its own. Shape is not strength. A well-built paragraph can carry a weak reason, and Chapter 29 is where reasons are judged, balanced and answered. Memory aids such as PEEL vary from class to class. Use the one your teacher uses; the bones are the same. The words that link the parts belong to Chapter 21.

  1. Write your point as one sentence a reader could agree or disagree with.
  2. Put the point first, or soon after a short lead-in.
  3. Choose support that backs this point, not a different one.
  4. Prefer one or two pieces of support, explained, over a pile of reasons.
  5. Make support concrete with a fact or a short example.
  6. Explain how each piece of support backs the point.
  7. End with a link back that returns to the point, sharpened.
  8. Do not copy the first sentence as the last.
  9. Move a second line of support into its own paragraph.
  10. Judge the shape here; leave the strength of the argument to Chapter 29.
A persuasive paragraph is built, not shouted. Its shape: 1. Point - what you want the reader to accept. 2. Support - a reason, fact or example for it. 3. Explanation - how the support backs the point. 4. Link back - the point again, sharpened. One point, one line of support. A complaint about the canteen does not support opening the library. The link back lifts the point; it does not copy it. This section judges shape, not strength. A weak reason can sit in a well-built paragraph; Chapter 29 judges reasons. Next: the cause-and-effect paragraph.

Cause and effect

A cause-and-effect paragraph explains how one thing led to another, link by link, in order.

Show the chain, not just the ends.

"Plastic bags and leaves had gathered in the drain. When the first heavy rain came, the water had nowhere to go. It rose over the road and into six houses."

Blocked drain, rain with nowhere to go, rising water, flooded houses: every link shown.
ShapeOpens withSuits
cause firstwhat happeneda reader who needs to see what followed
effect firstthe resulta reader already asking why
chainone cause, then a sequence of effects, each causing the nexta process or a series of events

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: one relationship, stated. Development: the links between cause and effect. Order: the links in the order they happened, so each leads to the next. Boundary: a sentence outside the chain goes.

Cause-and-effect paragraphs come in several shapes, and each needs its links in order.

PatternExample claimHow it develops
one cause, one effectBlocked drains flooded our lane.the links between the drain and the flood
one cause, several effectsThe new metro line changed our neighbourhood.one effect per sentence or two, most important last
several causes, one effectThree things made the harvest fail.one cause at a time, then how they combined

Notice three things. First, a chain needs every link. If a reader has to guess how one step led to the next, the paragraph has a gap. Fill it with the missing link, not with a stronger word such as "definitely".

Second, claim only what the chain shows. "The drain flooded the lane" is shown by the chain. "Plastic bags will destroy our city" is a leap the paragraph has not earned. Whether an argument about causes is convincing is Chapter 29's question; here, the job is to keep the claim the same size as the chain.

Third, the words that signal a link - because, so, as a result, therefore - belong to Chapter 21. This section owns the order of the links and whether each one is there. A paragraph full of "so" and "therefore" can still be missing a link; a paragraph with none can show the chain clearly.

Picture a row of dominoes. The cause is the first domino pushed; the effect is the last one falling. A cause-and-effect paragraph shows every domino in between, standing in order, each close enough to knock over the next. If one domino is missing, the reader sees the gap and wonders whether the last one really fell because of the first. A sentence outside the chain is a domino standing off to the side: it may be a fine domino, but it is not part of the row.

In Practice you ordered sentences by time and explained processes step by step. Section 22 built the expository paragraph. This section gives that paragraph a development pattern: cause and effect, ordered as a chain. Section 25 adds a second pattern, compare and contrast, and section 26 a third, definition. In Master, section 36, you will reorder a scrambled cause-and-effect chain under time pressure.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph where the order of events and the order of causes seem to disagree. Read this: "The harvest in Meera's village failed last year. The main cause was the late monsoon, which delayed sowing by a month. But the soil had already been weakened by three years of the same crop, and a pest attack in August finished what the weather had begun." In time, the order was: weak soil over three years, then the late monsoon, then the pest attack. The paragraph does not follow that order. It opens with the effect, names the main cause first, then reaches back in time for a background cause, then forward to a final blow. Is that out of order? Run the Order question: can a reader say why the sentences sit in this sequence? Yes. The paragraph is ordered by importance, not by time: main cause first, then the contributing ones. Words such as "main", "already" and "finished" tell the reader how each cause relates to the others. Compare a paragraph that simply lists the causes in random order with no signals. That reader cannot tell which cause mattered most or how they combined. The test is not whether the paragraph follows the calendar. It is whether the reader can see how the causes connect, and why they are told in this order.

Did you know that a famous old rhyme is a cause-and-effect paragraph in miniature? "For want of a nail the shoe was lost. For want of a shoe the horse was lost. For want of a horse the rider was lost. For want of a rider the battle was lost." Versions of this proverb have been recorded in English for several hundred years, and similar sayings appear in other languages. It usually continues until a whole kingdom is lost. Its power is the chain. Each line is a link, and each link leads to the next. Remove one line and the leap from a nail to a battle becomes absurd. Keep every line and a reader accepts, at least for the length of the rhyme, that small causes can have large effects. That is exactly what a cause-and-effect paragraph must do: show every domino, in order.

Cause first and effect first are both standard. Open with the effect when the reader is already asking why. Several causes may be ordered by importance rather than by time, as long as the reader can see why. One thing coming before another does not show that it caused it. Show the link. Keep the claim the size of the chain. Whether a causal argument convinces is Chapter 29's question; the signal words that join the links belong to Chapter 21.

  1. State the relationship first: what led to what.
  2. List the links between cause and effect before you write.
  3. Put the links in an order where each leads to the next.
  4. Fill any gap with the missing link, not a stronger word.
  5. Open with the effect when the reader is asking why.
  6. Order several causes by importance when time order would hide which mattered most.
  7. Signal how causes relate: main, also, already, finally.
  8. Keep the claim the same size as the chain you have shown.
  9. Do not treat one thing coming first as proof that it caused the next.
  10. Cut any sentence that is not part of the chain.
A cause-and-effect paragraph shows how one thing led to another. It is not two ends - a cause and an effect - but the chain between them: 1. State the relationship. 2. Lay out the links in order. 3. Make each link lead to the next. 4. Claim only what the chain shows. Blocked drain, rain with nowhere to go, rising water, flooded houses: every domino shown. Open with the cause or the effect. Order several causes by time or by importance, as long as the reader can see why. Coming first is not the same as causing. Next: compare and contrast.

Compare and contrast

A compare-and-contrast paragraph sets two things side by side, on the same points, so the reader can see how they are alike or different.

Match the points.

"The train is usually cheaper, while the bus fare is often higher. The train runs on fixed times; the bus can be slowed by traffic."

Cost with cost, timing with timing. The reader sees the difference at once.
PatternOrderSuits
one thing at a timeall of A, then all of B on the same pointsfew points, or when each thing needs a picture of its own
point by pointpoint 1 for A and B, point 2 for A and B...several points in a short paragraph

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: the two things and the basis, stated. Development: the same points for both. Order: one at a time or point by point, chosen for the reader. Boundary: a point about only one thing, or off the basis, goes.

Three decisions shape every compare-and-contrast paragraph.

DecisionQuestionTrain-and-bus example
basisCompared in terms of what?getting from Pune to Mumbai
focusLikenesses, differences, or both?mainly differences
orderOne at a time, or point by point?point by point: cost, timing, pick-up

Notice three things. First, every point needs a partner. If the paragraph says the train is cheap, it must say something about the bus's cost too. An unmatched point - "The train has a pantry car" with nothing about food on the bus - is half a comparison.

Second, the basis keeps the paragraph together. A comparison of the train and the bus for the Pune-Mumbai trip should not drift into the history of railways. That may be interesting, but it is off the basis.

Third, a closing judgement must follow from the points. "For a traveller near the station, the train is the better choice" follows from cost, timing and pick-up. "The bus is more fun" does not follow from anything the paragraph said. The words that mark a contrast - while, whereas, but, on the other hand - belong to Chapter 21; this section owns which points sit side by side.

Picture a pair of old-fashioned weighing scales with two pans. Each point of comparison is a pair of weights, one placed in each pan at the same moment: cost against cost, time against time. The reader watches the pans tip one way or the other. If you put a weight in only one pan, the reader cannot tell whether it tipped because of a real difference or because you forgot the other weight. A good comparison loads both pans, point by point, and lets the reader watch the balance.

Section 24 added cause and effect as a development pattern. This section adds a second: compare and contrast. Both are ways of developing one idea, and both depend on order - the chain in cause and effect, the matched points here. Section 26 adds a third pattern, definition. In Master, section 37, you will see how comparison works across genres, from a literature essay comparing two characters to a report comparing two options.

Here is the case that takes judgement: when the one-at-a-time pattern is the better choice. Read this, comparing two grandmothers' kitchens: "Nani's kitchen in Lucknow was dark and cool, lit by one small window above the stone sink. Pots hung from hooks along the wall, and the smell of cardamom never left the air. Dadi's kitchen in Chennai was the opposite: wide windows on two sides, steel shelves in rows, and the sharp smell of mustard seeds popping in hot oil. Two kitchens, two whole worlds." This paragraph describes one kitchen fully, then the other. Is that the weaker pattern? Run the Order question. The paragraph's purpose is not to help a reader choose between kitchens; it is to give each kitchen its own atmosphere. A point-by-point version - "Nani's was dark; Dadi's was bright. Nani's smelled of cardamom; Dadi's of mustard seeds" - would chop each picture into pieces. One at a time lets each world build before the next begins. And the points still match: light, objects, smell, for both kitchens, in the same order. That is what makes it a comparison and not two separate portraits. The test is not which pattern is better in general. It is which one serves this paragraph's purpose - and whether the same points appear on both sides.

Did you know that a famous diagram for comparison was not invented for writing at all? The Venn diagram - two overlapping circles, with likenesses in the middle and differences on each side - is named after John Venn, an English logician of the nineteenth century. He used overlapping circles to show relationships between groups in logic, not to plan essays. Teachers later found that the same picture helps learners sort what two things share from what makes each one different. The middle of the diagram holds the likenesses; each outer part holds what belongs to one thing only. A compare-and-contrast paragraph is a Venn diagram turned into sentences. Every point in an outer circle needs a partner point in the other outer circle - or else it belongs in a different paragraph.

Both patterns are standard. Point by point usually suits a short paragraph with several points; one at a time can suit a paragraph where each thing needs its own picture. A comparison may focus on likenesses, differences, or both. Say which in the topic sentence. A long comparison often needs several paragraphs, one per point or one per thing; that is a question for Chapter 30's whole essays. The contrast words that join the two sides - while, whereas, however - belong to Chapter 21. Whether a judgement between two options is fair is Chapter 29's question.

  1. Name the two things and the basis of comparison in the topic sentence.
  2. Say whether you are showing likenesses, differences, or both.
  3. List your points before you write.
  4. Give every point a partner: say something about both things.
  5. Keep the points in the same order for both things.
  6. Choose point by point for several points in a short paragraph.
  7. Choose one at a time when each thing needs its own picture.
  8. Stay on the basis; cut points that wander from it.
  9. Make any closing judgement follow from the points you gave.
  10. Do not compare two things that share no basis.
A compare-and-contrast paragraph sets two things side by side on the same points. Three decisions: 1. Basis - compared in terms of what? 2. Focus - likenesses, differences, or both? 3. Order - one at a time, or point by point? Every point needs a partner. Cost with cost, timing with timing. Point by point suits several points in a short paragraph. One at a time suits two pictures that each need room, like two grandmothers' kitchens. Stay on the basis, and let any judgement follow from the points. Next: defining a term, then developing it.

Defining, then developing

A definition paragraph defines a term, then develops it so the reader can recognise and use it.

Group, difference, then develop.

"A peninsula is a piece of land [group] that is surrounded by water on three sides and joined to a larger mass of land on the fourth [what sets it apart]."

Then: an example (southern India), a contrast (an island), a test (attached at one end).
PartQuestion it answersPeninsula example
groupWhat kind of thing is it?a piece of land
differenceWhat sets it apart from others of that kind?water on three sides, joined on the fourth
exampleWhat does one look like?the southern part of India
contrastWhat is it not?an island, surrounded on every side
test (optional)How do I recognise one?land reaching into the sea, attached at one end

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: one term, defined. Development: example, contrast, test. Order: definition first, then general to specific. Boundary: anything not about this term goes.

A definition can be developed in several ways. Choose the ones that help this reader.

DevelopmentWhen it helpsExample for 'habit'
examplealmost always; it makes the term concretebrushing your teeth without thinking about it
contrast with a neighbourwhen a similar term is often confused with ita habit is not the same as a choice made fresh each time
parts or featureswhen the term has a few key featuresit is repeated, it is often automatic, it is triggered by a cue
limitwhen the term is often stretched too fardoing something once is not yet a habit

Notice three things. First, the group must be the right size. "A peninsula is a thing that..." is too wide to help; "a piece of land that..." tells the reader where to look.

Second, the definition must not use the word it defines. "A habit is something you do habitually" sends the reader in a circle. Use other words: "something you do so often that you do it without deciding to".

Third, a definition paragraph is not a list of facts about the term. "Peninsulas can be large or small. Many have beaches. Some have lighthouses." These facts may be true, but they do not help the reader recognise a peninsula. Choose development that sharpens the definition, not development that merely adds to it.

Picture drawing a fence around a word. The definition sentence puts in the first posts: what group the word belongs to, and what sets it apart. The example is a sheep standing inside the fence, so the reader can see what belongs. The contrast is a goat standing just outside, so the reader can see where the fence runs. The test is a gate the reader can use to check any new animal. Without the sheep and the goat, the fence is only a line on the ground; with them, the reader knows exactly where the field begins and ends.

Sections 24 and 25 added cause and effect and comparison as development patterns. This section adds the third: definition, which often borrows the others - a contrast with a neighbour is a small comparison. In Master, section 33, you will expand notes into a paragraph, often beginning with a definition, and in section 38 you will build definition answers under exam conditions.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a term whose everyday meaning and subject meaning are different. Read this, from a science answer: "In science, work is done when a force moves an object in the direction of the force. Pushing a heavy cart across a yard is work in this sense. But holding a heavy bag still for an hour is not, however tiring it feels, because the bag does not move. So the scientific meaning of work is narrower than the everyday one." The reader already knows the everyday word work: effort, a job, something tiring. The paragraph has to define a different, stricter meaning without confusing them. Look at how it is built. The first sentence names the field - "in science" - so the reader knows which meaning is in play. The example (pushing a cart) fits both meanings. The contrast is the clever part: holding a bag is work in everyday speech but not in science. That single contrast shows exactly where the scientific fence runs. The close names the difference outright. Without the contrast, a reader might nod at the definition and still think of tiredness when they see the word. The test is whether the development shows the boundary the reader is most likely to get wrong. For a term with an everyday twin, that boundary is usually the everyday meaning itself.

Did you know that one of the most famous English dictionaries was largely the work of one man? Samuel Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language was published in 1755. Johnson wrote its definitions over several years, working with a small team of helpers who copied out quotations. What made the dictionary unusual for its time was that Johnson illustrated many words with quotations from earlier writers, showing each word in use. A definition told the reader what a word meant; a quotation showed them the word at work. That is the instinct behind a definition paragraph. The definition line is only the start. The example, the contrast and the test show the word at work, so the reader can recognise it next time without the dictionary.

A definition paragraph usually opens with the definition, but a short question or a common misunderstanding may lead in first. Not every definition needs every kind of development. Choose an example almost always, and a contrast when a neighbour is easily confused. When a term has an everyday meaning and a subject meaning, name the field and contrast the two. Figures of speech that explain a term by comparison, such as metaphor, belong to Chapter 26. Whether a definition is fair in an argument is Chapter 29's question.

  1. Use the frame: a [term] is a [group] that [what sets it apart].
  2. Choose a group that is the right size: not 'a thing', not too narrow.
  3. Never use the term, or a form of it, to define itself.
  4. Name the field when a word has an everyday meaning too.
  5. Give at least one example the reader can picture.
  6. Contrast the term with a neighbour it is often confused with.
  7. Add a limit or a test when the term is often stretched.
  8. Choose development that sharpens recognition, not loose facts.
  9. Do not let an example replace the definition.
  10. Keep every sentence about the one term.
A definition paragraph defines a term, then develops it so the reader can recognise it. Its shape: 1. Group - what kind of thing it is. 2. Difference - what sets it apart. 3. Example - one the reader can picture. 4. Contrast - what it is not. 5. Test (optional) - how to recognise one. A peninsula: land, water on three sides, southern India, not an island, attached at one end. Do not define a word with itself. Do not let a fact list or an example replace the definition. When a word has an everyday twin, contrast the two. Next: opening a piece.

Opening a piece

An introduction is a paragraph with three parts: a hook, context and a purpose statement. Each has its own job.

Hook, context, purpose.

"Every morning at seven, the lane outside our school becomes a car park. ... Our school has more than a thousand pupils ... This essay argues that a walking bus would make that morning journey safer, calmer and healthier."

A scene, the facts that make it matter, and where the essay is going.
PartIts jobSchool-run example
hookmakes the reader want to read onthe lane becomes a car park
contextgives what the reader needs to understanda thousand pupils in twenty minutes
purpose statementsays what the piece will doa walking bus would make it safer, calmer, healthier

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: the piece's purpose, stated at the end. Development: hook and context lead to it. Order: hook, context, purpose - general interest narrowing to the exact point. Boundary: anything that does none of the three jobs goes.

Hooks come in several kinds. Choose one that suits the piece and leads toward the purpose.

HookExampleSuits
a short sceneThe lane outside our school becomes a car park.essays on local issues, stories, articles
a questionWhat if the school run took no cars at all?persuasive and exploratory pieces
a striking, true factMost of our pupils arrive in the same twenty minutes.reports, articles, explanations
a contrastOur grandparents walked to school; we are driven.pieces about change

Notice three things. First, the hook must lead somewhere. A dramatic opening about a tiger escaping from the zoo will grab attention, but if the essay is about the school run, the reader feels tricked. A good hook is the first step toward the purpose, not a detour.

Second, context is what the reader needs, not everything the writer knows. One to three sentences usually do. Background that the body will develop belongs in the body.

Third, the purpose statement is the introduction's topic sentence, placed last. In an essay, it often names the main ideas the body will develop - "safer, calmer and healthier" - so the reader can follow each body paragraph. Whether the argument it announces is strong is Chapter 29's question; how a whole essay delivers on it is Chapter 30's.

Picture a funnel. The hook is the wide mouth at the top, where the reader's attention is caught. Context is the sloping sides, narrowing the reader's view from the scene to the issue. The purpose statement is the narrow spout at the bottom, where everything is directed to one exact point: what this piece will do. A warm-up opening is a funnel with no spout - wide at the top, wide all the way down, and nothing ever directed anywhere.

Sections 22 to 26 built body paragraphs: expository, persuasive and three development patterns. This section builds a paragraph with a different job - opening a whole piece. Section 28 builds its partner, the concluding paragraph. Section 30 then joins any two paragraphs with a content bridge. In Master, section 32, you will write an introduction and a body paragraph under a stated topic and word limit, and Chapter 30 will assemble full essays.

Here is the case that takes judgement: an introduction for a story or personal piece, where a purpose statement would sound wrong. Read this, the opening of a personal essay: "My grandfather kept his watch three minutes fast. For forty years, he said, it had never let him miss a train. The day he gave it to me, it was still three minutes fast, and I have never set it right." There is a hook - a curious detail. There is context - forty years, trains, the gift. But there is no sentence beginning "This essay will describe...". Is the introduction missing its purpose? Run the Topic question from section 21. A personal essay, like a story, may imply its purpose rather than state it. The last sentence - "I have never set it right" - points clearly toward what the piece is about: memory, inheritance, keeping something as it was. The reader knows where the piece is going without being told. Now imagine adding "This essay is about my grandfather's watch and what it means to me." The sentence is accurate, but it flattens the opening and tells the reader what the details already showed. The test is not whether a sentence beginning "This essay" appears. It is whether the reader knows where the piece is going. In an exam essay or a report, state it plainly. In a personal essay or a story, the last sentence of the introduction can point the way without announcing it.

Did you know that one of the most famous opening sentences in English literature is itself a complete introduction? Jane Austen's novel Pride and Prejudice, published in 1813, begins: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife." It hooks the reader with a bold, slightly comic claim. It gives the context of the whole novel: money, marriage, and what society takes for granted. And it points toward the novel's purpose, because readers soon suspect that the "truth" is being gently mocked. One sentence does all three jobs. Most introductions need a full paragraph, but Austen's opening shows how much an opening can carry when every word is chosen for a purpose.

Hook, context and purpose is the standard shape for essays, reports and articles. A personal essay or a story may imply its purpose rather than state it. The hook must be true and must lead toward the purpose. Do not invent a statistic or a quotation to hook a reader. Keep context short; save evidence for the body. Whether the argument announced is strong is Chapter 29's question. How a whole essay keeps the promise of its purpose statement is Chapter 30's work.

  1. Write the purpose statement first, then build the introduction toward it.
  2. Choose a hook that suits the piece: a scene, a question, a true fact, a contrast.
  3. Make sure the hook leads toward the purpose, not away from it.
  4. Never invent a fact or a quotation to hook the reader.
  5. Give one to three sentences of context: only what the reader needs.
  6. Save evidence and detail for the body paragraphs.
  7. End with the purpose statement in an essay or report.
  8. Make the purpose say what the piece will argue or explain, not just its topic.
  9. Name the main ideas the body will develop when it helps the reader follow.
  10. Cut warm-up sentences such as 'Since the beginning of time'.
An introduction is a paragraph with three parts. 1. Hook - makes the reader want to read on. 2. Context - what the reader needs to understand. 3. Purpose statement - what the piece will do. The lane becomes a car park; a thousand pupils in twenty minutes; a walking bus would make it safer, calmer, healthier. The hook must lead toward the purpose. Context is short. The purpose says what the piece will argue or explain, not just its topic. A warm-up opening does none of the three jobs. In a personal essay or story, the purpose may be implied. Next: closing a piece.

Closing a piece

A concluding paragraph has two jobs: restate the one idea freshly, and close the piece without opening a new one.

Restate, gather, close.

"A walking bus asks for very little ... In return, it would take cars out of the lane, give pupils a calm start to the day and add a short walk to every morning. ... It could begin with a line of children, walking to school together."

The idea in new words, the three points gathered, and a closing image.
PartIts jobWalking-bus example
restatementthe one idea, in fresh wordsA walking bus asks for very little.
gatheringthe main points, drawn togetherfewer cars, a calm start, a short walk
closing movefinishes the piecea line of children, walking to school together

Run the Paragraph Check. Topic: the piece's one idea, restated. Development: the main points, gathered, not re-argued. Order: restate, gather, close - specific points widening to a final thought. Boundary: a new idea goes; it belongs in the body or nowhere.

Closing moves come in several kinds. Choose one that suits the piece.

Closing moveExampleSuits
return to the hookThe lane could begin with a line of children instead of horns.essays that opened with a scene or question
why it mattersA cleaner street is a safer street for every child on it.explanations and arguments
look aheadIf one street can do it, the next can too.pieces about change
call to actionAsk at the next parents' meeting: who will walk on Monday?persuasive pieces and speeches

Notice three things. First, restating is not repeating. "This essay has argued that a walking bus would make the school run safer" copies the introduction. "A walking bus asks for very little" says the same idea in a new way, now that the reader has seen the evidence.

Second, gathering is not re-arguing. One sentence can name the main points; the evidence has already been given in the body and does not need to be told again.

Third, "why it matters" must stay inside the essay's scope. "A walking bus would make our lane safer for every child on it" stays in scope. "A walking bus would end pollution in the whole world" is a new, much larger claim the essay never supported. Whether a call to action is persuasive is Chapter 29's question; how a conclusion closes a whole multi-paragraph essay is developed in Chapter 30.

Picture tying a parcel. The body paragraphs are the things packed inside the box. The conclusion is the string: it goes around everything once, pulling it together, and finishes with a knot. A conclusion that copies the introduction is a second label stuck on the lid. A conclusion that adds a new idea is a loose object balanced on top of the tied box, likely to fall off. A conclusion that simply stops is a box with the string left hanging. The knot is the closing move: small, firm, and the last thing the reader's hand touches.

Section 27 built the introduction: hook, context, purpose statement. This section builds its partner: the conclusion, which restates that purpose and closes the piece. Section 29 asks when a paragraph should split, and section 30 builds the bridge between paragraphs. In Master, section 34, you will summarise a paragraph to its one core idea, the same skill a restatement depends on, and Chapter 30 will close whole essays.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a closing move that looks like a new idea but is not. Read this conclusion to an essay arguing that a town should turn its empty cinema into a library: "An empty building and a town without books are two problems with one answer. Turning the old cinema into a library would give pupils a place to read and give the building a reason to open its doors again. And perhaps one day, on the same screen where films once played, the town will show the work of its own young writers." The last sentence mentions something the essay never argued for: showing young writers' work on the screen. Is that a new idea? Run the Boundary question. A new idea is a claim the reader is asked to accept without support - the swimming pool. This sentence asks the reader to accept nothing. It is a look ahead, marked by "perhaps one day", that grows directly out of the essay's idea: a library, in a cinema, for young readers. It finishes the piece by showing where the idea could lead, not by starting a new argument. Compare: "The town should also build a cinema in the old library." That is a new claim, unrelated to the essay's case, asking to be accepted. The test is not whether the last sentence contains anything new. It is whether it grows from the essay's one idea and finishes it, or opens a new claim the essay never earned.

Did you know that one of the most famous short speeches in English ends with a closing move that gathers its whole purpose into a single sentence? Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, delivered in 1863 at the dedication of a cemetery during the American Civil War, is only a few short paragraphs long. Its final sentence is long and builds steadily toward its end, gathering the speech's ideas - the dead who gave their lives, the living who must carry on their work, and the nation's future - into one closing resolve. The speech does not end with a new topic. It ends by returning to its purpose and lifting it: the meaning of the field the listeners stood on, turned into a promise about the future. That is what a conclusion does. Chapter 27's close-reading section, section 39, studies one of the Address's paragraphs in full.

A conclusion may be one paragraph or, in a long piece, a short final section; in a short answer, one or two sentences may be enough. A look ahead that grows from the essay's idea is not a new idea. A new claim the essay never supported is. Keep 'why it matters' inside the essay's scope. Avoid 'In conclusion' if your teacher prefers fresher openings; it is not wrong, but it cannot do the restating for you. Whether a call to action persuades is Chapter 29's question; closing whole essays is Chapter 30's.

  1. Reread your purpose statement before you write the conclusion.
  2. Restate the one idea in fresh words, not the introduction's words.
  3. Gather the main points in one or two sentences.
  4. Do not re-tell the evidence; the body has given it.
  5. Choose a closing move: return to the hook, why it matters, look ahead, or a call to action.
  6. Keep 'why it matters' inside the essay's scope.
  7. Never add a new claim the essay did not develop.
  8. Let a look ahead grow from the essay's own idea.
  9. End with a sentence that finishes the piece.
  10. Check the last sentence: knot, or loose string?
A concluding paragraph has two jobs. 1. Restate the one idea - in fresh words. 2. Close the piece - without opening a new idea. Its shape: restate, gather the main points, then a closing move. Closing moves: return to the hook, why it matters, look ahead, a call to action. The walking-bus conclusion restated the idea, gathered three points into one sentence, and closed with a line of children walking together. Restating is not repeating. Gathering is not re-arguing. A look ahead that grows from the idea is fine; a new claim is not. Tie the knot. Next: when a paragraph should split.

When to split

A paragraph should split when a second idea has crept in and is being developed. The Boundary question decides it, not the length.

Find where the idea changes.

"... The waterfall itself was smaller than the photographs, but louder than anything I had imagined. | On the way back, Kavya told me she wanted to become a doctor. ..."

The trek ends at the waterfall. Kavya's ambition begins a new idea, and three sentences develop it. Split there.
What you findDecision
a second idea, developed by several sentencessplit at the sentence where it begins
one stray sentence about something elsetrim it (or move it)
one idea, long but unifiedkeep it
one idea, asserted but not developeddevelop it further

This is the fourth question of the Paragraph Check, Boundary, at full strength: has a second idea crept in - time to split - or is the one idea still thin - time to develop it?

Three tests help you find the split point and make the right decision.

TestQuestionTrek paragraph
name itCan one short phrase cover every sentence?'the trek' covers five; 'Kavya's ambition' covers three
find the turnWhich sentence is the first that the first phrase does not cover?On the way back, Kavya told me...
weigh itDo the sentences after the turn develop the new idea?yes: her mother's illness, the nurse, her reading

Notice three things. First, a time or place word can hide a turn. "On the way back" sounds like more of the trek, but the sentence it opens is about something else entirely. Judge by the idea, not by the opening words.

Second, a split usually needs a small repair. The new paragraph may need its own topic sentence, and the old one may need a closing sentence, so that each stands on its own. Section 30 builds the bridge between them.

Third, splitting for idea is not the same as breaking for effect. A writer may set one short sentence alone on the page for drama; that mark-level choice belongs to Chapter 25. This section asks whether the content inside a paragraph still holds one idea.

Picture two rooms in a house with the wall between them knocked down. From the doorway it looks like one large room. But walk in and you find a kitchen at one end - stove, sink, shelves - and a bedroom at the other - bed, cupboard, lamp. Nothing is wrong with either. The problem is that they share one space. Cutting the bed in half will not help. Splitting a paragraph is putting the wall back up, in exactly the place where the kitchen ends and the bedroom begins.

Discover section 9 asked how long a paragraph should be, and Practice section 15 checked unity on longer paragraphs. Sections 22 to 28 built paragraphs of every kind. This section brings the Boundary question to full strength: when a paragraph should become two. Section 30 then builds the content bridge that joins them. In Master, section 35, you will revise longer drafts for unity, deciding when to cut, move or split.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a long paragraph that looks like two ideas but is really one. Read this, from a report on a school sports day: "Sports day was a success because of how it was organised. Events ran to a printed timetable, so no race started late. Each house had a marshal who led its runners to the start line. Water stations stood at both ends of the field, staffed by Class 9 volunteers. A first-aid tent sat by the gate, and it was needed only twice. When rain threatened at two o'clock, the organisers moved the last events into the hall within ten minutes." It is long, and it covers timetables, marshals, water, first aid and rain. Should it split? Run the name-it test. One phrase covers every sentence: how the day was organised. Timetable, marshals, water, first aid and the rain plan are all developments of that one idea. There is no turn. The paragraph is long because its one idea has many supporting details, not because a second idea crept in. Now change the last sentence: "The 100 metres was won by Arjun, who also broke the school record." That sentence is about results, not organisation, and if two more sentences followed it about other winners, it would be the turn. The test is not length, and not the number of different nouns. It is whether one short phrase can cover every sentence. If it can, keep the paragraph whole, however long.

Did you know that paragraph length has changed with the page it is read on? Many novels and essays from the nineteenth century contain paragraphs that run for a page or more. Readers of the time were used to long, unbroken blocks of print. Newspapers, printed in narrow columns, have long used much shorter paragraphs, sometimes only a sentence or two, so that a column of print does not become a wall. Writing for phone screens has pushed many writers shorter still. Yet the principle underneath has not changed. A short newspaper paragraph and a long Victorian one each hold a unit of thought; they simply cut that unit to a different size for a different page. That is why this chapter never gives a word-count rule. The Boundary question - has a second idea crept in? - works on any page.

Length alone never decides a split. A long paragraph with one idea stays whole; a short one with two ideas splits. One stray sentence is trimmed or moved, not turned into its own paragraph. After a split, check that each paragraph stands on its own; it may need a new topic sentence or a closing line, and a bridge (section 30). A one-sentence paragraph set alone for effect is a punctuation-and-layout choice owned by Chapter 25. Different publications prefer different typical lengths; the idea test still applies.

  1. Name the paragraph's first idea in a short phrase.
  2. Read sentence by sentence: is this still covered by the phrase?
  3. Mark the first sentence that is not.
  4. Ask whether the sentences after it develop a new idea.
  5. If they do, split at the marked sentence.
  6. If only one sentence strays, trim or move it instead.
  7. Keep a long paragraph whole if one phrase covers every sentence.
  8. Do not be fooled by time or place words that open a new idea.
  9. After splitting, give each paragraph what it needs to stand alone.
  10. Never split by word count; split by idea.
A paragraph should split when a second idea has crept in and is being developed. Three tests: 1. Name it - can one short phrase cover every sentence? 2. Find the turn - which sentence is the first the phrase does not cover? 3. Weigh it - do the sentences after it develop a new idea? The trek paragraph turned at "On the way back, Kavya told me she wanted to become a doctor." Split there. Decisions: split a developed second idea; trim a single stray; keep a long, unified paragraph; develop a thin one. Split by idea, never by word count. Next: the bridge to the next paragraph.

The bridge to what comes next

A content bridge carries an idea from the end of one paragraph into the start of the next, so the reader can see how the second grows from the first.

Pick up, then turn.

End of paragraph one: "The danger of the morning rush would shrink to the width of a pavement."
Start of paragraph two: "A safer lane would also be a calmer one."

'Safer' picks up the danger idea; 'calmer' turns to the new one.
JoinWhat the reader seesVerdict
content bridgethe new paragraph picks up the old idea and turns ita clear crossing
linking word only'Furthermore' says more is coming, not how it connectsa signal, not a bridge
no linkthe new paragraph starts somewhere unrelateda jump

This uses the Paragraph Check across the join. Topic: each paragraph keeps its own idea. Order: the second grows from the first. Boundary: the bridge sits at the edge, linking two ideas without merging them.

Content bridges come in a few common shapes, depending on how the two ideas relate.

RelationBridge shapeExample opening
additionthe old idea leads to a further oneA safer lane would also be a calmer one.
resultthe old idea causes the new oneWith fewer cars in the lane, the air at the gate would be cleaner too.
contrastthe new idea pushes against the oldSafety, though, is only half the story; cost matters as well.
next stepthe new idea follows in time or processOnce the route is chosen, the next task is finding volunteers.

Notice three things. First, the bridge is usually at the start of the new paragraph, but it may be helped by the end of the old one. A closing sentence that points ahead - "But safety is only the first gain" - can prepare the crossing.

Second, the bridge picks up an idea, not just a word. Repeating "lane" at the start of the next paragraph is not enough if the idea has nothing to do with the last one. The shared element must be part of the meaning.

Third, a bridge does not merge two paragraphs. It links two ideas at their edge; each paragraph still holds its own. The words that signal the relation - also, though, as a result, once - belong to Chapter 21. Assembling many paragraphs into a full essay is Chapter 30's work.

Picture crossing a stream on stepping stones. Each paragraph is a stone, solid and complete. The bridge is the reach from one stone to the next: you can only step across if the next stone is close enough to the one you are standing on. A content bridge places the first sentence of the new paragraph right beside the last sentence of the old one, so the reader's foot finds it. A linking word alone is a shout of 'jump!' across a wide gap; it may encourage the reader, but it does not move the stone any closer.

Section 29 split paragraphs that held two ideas. This section joins the paragraphs that result, with a bridge made of content. Sections 27 and 28 built introductions and conclusions; a bridge links them to the body. This closes the Craft band. In Master, section 31, you will run the full Paragraph Check on demanding paragraphs, and Chapter 30 will assemble whole essays, paragraph by paragraph, with every bridge in place.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a bridge for a contrast, where the next paragraph pushes against the last. Read the end of one paragraph and the start of the next, from an essay weighing a walking bus: "... For most families on our street, a walking bus would be safer, calmer and free." Then: "For families who live beyond the river, however, the walk would take forty minutes." The second paragraph argues against the first. Is there a bridge, or a jump? Look at what is carried across. "For most families on our street" ends the first paragraph; "For families who live beyond the river" begins the second. The shared idea is families and where they live. The second sentence picks it up and turns it: not most families, but some; not near, but far. The contrast is built from the same material as the agreement. Compare a weaker version: "However, the walking bus has problems." The word however signals contrast, but nothing in the sentence shows which part of the first paragraph is being pushed against. The reader must guess. The test is whether the reader can see what is being picked up and how it is turned - added to, caused, contrasted or followed. A contrast bridge is still a bridge: it reaches back to a specific idea before it pushes against it.

Did you know that the classic old textbooks on writing devoted much of their advice to the paragraph? In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many English composition textbooks taught the paragraph as the central unit of writing, with rules about unity, coherence and emphasis. They described how a paragraph should hold together inside, and how one paragraph should lead into the next. The details of their rules varied, and later writers questioned some of them, especially rules about exactly where a topic sentence must sit. But the core advice about coherence has lasted: a reader should be able to feel how each paragraph grows from the one before. That is the bridge this section builds. The rules may change from textbook to textbook; the reader's need to cross from one stone to the next does not.

A content bridge usually opens the new paragraph, but the closing sentence of the old one can prepare it. A linking word is not wrong; it can signal the relation. It simply cannot replace the shared idea. Not every paragraph needs an elaborate bridge. In a list of separate steps or a set of distinct sections with headings, a lighter link may be enough. The linking words themselves, and given-before-new order within sentences, belong to Chapter 21. Assembling full essays is Chapter 30's work.

  1. Read the last sentence of the paragraph you are leaving.
  2. Name its idea in a few words.
  3. Open the next paragraph by picking up that idea.
  4. Turn it toward the new paragraph's idea in the same sentence.
  5. Decide the relation: addition, result, contrast or next step.
  6. Let a linking word signal the relation, if it helps, but never replace it.
  7. Pick up an idea, not just a repeated word.
  8. Keep the bridge short so the new paragraph starts its own idea.
  9. Vary your openings; do not start every paragraph with 'Also'.
  10. Read each join aloud to check the reader can cross.
A content bridge carries an idea from the end of one paragraph into the start of the next. Pick up, then turn: "The danger would shrink." / "A safer lane would also be a calmer one." Bridge shapes: addition, result, contrast, next step. A linking word can signal a bridge but cannot build one. Furthermore, on its own, is a shout across a gap. Pick up an idea, not just a word. Keep the bridge short so the new paragraph has its own idea. A contrast bridge reaches back to a specific idea before pushing against it. Craft band complete. Next: Master, and the full Paragraph Check on demanding paragraphs.

Thinking like a writer · ages 16–19

Unity and order, together

The full Paragraph Check runs four questions in order, then makes one decision. At this level, it is how you find problems that smooth reading hides.

Run all four; then decide.

Topic: libraries now offer far more than books. Development: laptops, classes, tools. Order: claim, examples, close. Boundary: "Libraries were first built in ancient times to store written records." - on the topic, off the idea.

Decision: trim the history sentence. It answers Boundary.
QuestionWhat it catchesDecision it leads to
Topicno single idea, or an idea too broad to developnarrow or state the idea
Developmentrepetition, or claims asserted without supportdevelop it
Ordera sequence with no reason a reader can feelreorder it
Boundarya stray on the topic but off the idea, or a developed second ideatrim, or split

If all four questions pass, the decision is to keep the paragraph as it is - and that, too, should be defended.

Quiet problems are the ones this band is about. Each hides behind a feature that sounds right.

Quiet problemWhat hides itWhich question finds it
on-topic strayit shares the paragraph's subjectBoundary: is it on the idea, not just the topic?
disguised repetitionit uses new words for the same pointDevelopment: does it add anything?
plausible ordereach sentence follows the last smoothlyOrder: can a reader say why this sequence?
one-clause second ideait arrives inside a sentence, not as a new oneBoundary: is a second idea developed?
borrowed closeit sounds like a conclusionDevelopment: does it draw together, or overreach?

Notice three things. First, run the questions in order. A paragraph with no clear topic cannot be judged for development, because there is nothing to develop; Topic comes first.

Second, one paragraph usually needs one main decision. If you find several problems, fix the one that the others depend on. A paragraph that needs splitting may look disordered only because two ideas are tangled; split first, then check each half's order.

Third, the justification matters as much as the decision. "Trim the history sentence, because it is on the topic but off the idea (Boundary)" can be checked by any reader. "It sounds better without it" cannot.

Picture a building inspector with a four-page checklist: foundations, walls, the order of the rooms, and the property line. A house can look beautiful from the street - fresh paint, neat windows - and still have a crack in the foundation or a shed built on the neighbour's land. The inspector does not judge by the paint. She walks the four pages in order, because a cracked foundation makes the walls irrelevant. The Paragraph Check is that checklist: Topic is the foundation, Development the walls, Order the rooms, Boundary the property line.

The Discover, Practice and Craft bands each built part of the Paragraph Check: grouping and order, then topic sentences and development, then patterns, introductions, conclusions, splitting and bridging. This section opens the Master band by running all four questions together on demanding paragraphs. Sections 32 to 38 apply the full check to exam tasks, notes, summaries, revision and genres; section 39 reads a published paragraph with it, and section 40 asks you to build and defend your own.

Here is the case that takes the most judgement: two sound decisions, and you must choose which comes first. Read this, from an essay on school uniforms: "School uniforms reduce visible differences in family income. When everyone wears the same clothes, pupils cannot tell who owns expensive brands. Uniforms can be costly, though, and some families struggle to buy the full set each year. Some schools now run second-hand uniform shops to help. A pupil from a poorer family may feel less singled out in a classroom where everyone looks alike." Run the check. Topic: the first sentence claims uniforms reduce visible income differences. Development: the brands sentence and the last sentence support it. Order: the last sentence, which supports the claim, is separated from the claim by two sentences about cost. Boundary: the cost sentences are a second idea - uniforms can themselves be a burden - developed by the second-hand shop sentence. So there are two problems: a second idea (Boundary) and a misplaced support sentence (Order). Which first? Split first. The order problem exists only because the second idea has been dropped into the middle. Once the cost sentences move to their own paragraph, the last sentence sits directly after the brands sentence, and the order mends itself. Reordering first would only shuffle a tangled paragraph. The test is which problem the other depends on. Fix that one, then re-run the check.

Did you know that checklists have been credited with reducing serious errors in fields such as aviation and surgery? Pilots have long worked through written checklists before take-off, so that no step is skipped, however experienced the crew. In the 2000s, a short surgical safety checklist was promoted internationally, and studies of its use reported fewer complications in some hospitals. The reason is not that experts do not know the steps. It is that a smooth, familiar routine makes it easy to skip one without noticing. A checklist turns 'it feels fine' into 'I have checked'. The Paragraph Check works the same way. An experienced writer knows what a good paragraph is; the four questions, run in order, stop smooth reading from skipping the step where the quiet problem hides.

One paragraph usually needs one main decision. Fix the problem the others depend on, then re-run the check. 'Keep it as it is' is a real decision and should be defended like the others. The check judges architecture, not grammar, word choice or rhythm. A sentence-level fault is Chapter 23's, a rhythm problem Chapter 24's, and wordiness Chapter 20's. In a story or memoir, Topic may be implied (section 21); run the check on the implied idea.

  1. Read once for sense before you judge.
  2. Run the four questions in order: Topic, Development, Order, Boundary.
  3. Write the Topic in one sentence before checking anything else.
  4. Distrust smoothness; look for on-topic strays.
  5. Test each 'new' sentence: does it add, or only rephrase?
  6. Name the order and the reason it suits the job.
  7. Look for second ideas inside single clauses.
  8. Make one main decision: keep, develop, reorder or split (or trim).
  9. If problems overlap, fix the one the others depend on first.
  10. Justify the decision in one sentence that names the question.
The full Paragraph Check runs four questions, in order. 1. Topic - what is the one idea? 2. Development - does every sentence add support? 3. Order - can a reader say why this sequence? 4. Boundary - any on-topic stray, or a developed second idea? Then one decision: keep, develop, reorder, split or trim, justified by the question it answers. Smoothness hides quiet problems: the library history sentence was on the topic but off the idea. When problems overlap, fix the one the others depend on. The uniform paragraph needed splitting before its order could be judged. Next: the exam paragraph-writing task.

The exam paragraph-writing task

Under a word limit, plan the paragraph's architecture first, then write to the plan.

Read, plan, size, write, check.

Task: "Write a paragraph of about 120 words explaining why a school garden is valuable for pupils."
Plan: claim - teaches what a classroom cannot / support - science, maths, patience, food / order - subjects to wider lessons / close - one of its best classrooms.
StepWhat you doGarden example
readunderline topic, task word, limitschool garden / explaining / about 120 words
planclaim, supports, order, close in four linesas above
sizedivide the limit between the partsclaim ~15, four supports ~20 each, close ~20
writeone sentence or two per plan linethe answer above
checktask word, claim, lengthexplains, stays on value to pupils, near 120

The plan is the Paragraph Check in advance: Topic is the claim line, Development the support lines, Order the order line, Boundary the check at the end.

The task word shapes the whole paragraph. Read it as carefully as the topic.

Task wordWhat the paragraph must doUsual shape
describeshow what something is likea dominant impression, spatial or general-to-specific order
explainshow how or why something is soclaim, evidence, explanation (section 22)
argue / persuademove a reader toward a viewpoint, support, link back (section 23)
narratetell what happenedchronological order, often an implied idea (section 21)

Notice three things. First, a mismatch with the task word is a structural error, not a small slip. A beautiful description of a garden does not answer "explain why a garden is valuable".

Second, a word limit is a design limit. If the limit is about 120 words, a claim and three or four developed supports fit; seven supports do not, and an answer that tries will list instead of develop. Choose fewer supports and develop them.

Third, do not pad toward the limit. If the plan is done and the paragraph is short, develop a support further with an example; do not add a new idea or a restated claim. Exact rules about how strictly a limit is applied vary between assessments, so follow the instructions you are given; the architecture works for any limit.

Picture packing a small suitcase for a weekend trip with a strict weight limit. You do not throw things in until the zip will not close. You decide first what the trip needs - clothes for two days, a toothbrush, a book - and give each its corner. The plan is the packing list; the word limit is the suitcase. A writer who starts without a plan fills the case with the first things they see and finds, at the end, that the toothbrush will not fit.

Section 31 ran the full Paragraph Check on paragraphs already written. This section runs it before writing, as a plan, under a stated topic and word limit. Section 33 turns notes into a developed paragraph, and section 38 returns to exam conditions with the check run at speed. The expository and persuasive shapes of sections 22 and 23 are the ones most exam paragraph tasks call for.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a task that seems to ask for two things in one paragraph. Read this task: "In about 120 words, describe your favourite place and explain why it matters to you." Two task words: describe and explain. Does that mean two ideas, and so a paragraph that should split? Run the Topic question on the task, not the answer. The task names one subject - your favourite place - and two jobs to do with it. The paragraph's one idea can carry both: "My grandmother's veranda matters to me because it is where I learned to listen." Description then serves the explanation: the creaking swing, the smell of jasmine, the evening stories, each chosen because it shows why the place matters. Compare a paragraph that describes the veranda for eighty words and then adds, "It matters to me because I like it." That answer has treated the two jobs as two separate halves, and the second half is thin. Now compare a task that truly asks for two ideas: "Describe your school and explain how you would change its timetable." Two subjects, two jobs; in one paragraph the Boundary question will strain. If the instructions demand one paragraph, the writer must find a single idea that joins them, or keep each half tightly linked. The test is whether one claim can carry both task words. If it can, let the description serve the explanation; if it cannot, the plan must say how the two parts are joined.

Did you know that the habit of planning before writing appears in advice going back centuries? Ancient teachers of rhetoric divided the work of composing a speech into stages, and the first stages - finding what to say and arranging it - came before choosing the words. The Roman tradition named these stages, and arrangement, the ordering of material, was treated as its own skill. Modern research on writing has often contrasted writers who plan with writers who simply start and keep going, and many teachers recommend at least a brief plan, especially under time limits. The four-line plan in this section is that old order of work in miniature: find the claim, arrange the support, then write.

Exam instructions vary. Follow the stated word limit, the number of paragraphs and any format you are given. A four-line plan is a guide, not a rule; some writers plan in a short list or a quick diagram. The task word decides the shape. Explain calls for claim and evidence; describe for an impression; argue for point and support; narrate for time order. This section describes paragraph tasks generically; it does not copy any real paper. Assembling multi-paragraph essays under time is Chapter 30's work.

  1. Underline the topic, the task word and the word limit.
  2. Answer the exact question asked, not a nearby one.
  3. Write a four-line plan: claim, supports, order, close.
  4. Choose two to four supports and develop them; do not list seven.
  5. Divide the limit between the parts before you write.
  6. Match the shape to the task word.
  7. When two task words appear, find one claim that carries both.
  8. If you run short, develop a support further; never pad.
  9. Check every sentence against the task word and the claim.
  10. Check the length last, against the plan.
Under a word limit, architecture comes before wording. Read, plan, size, write, check: 1. Read - topic, task word, limit. 2. Plan - claim, supports, order, close. 3. Size - divide the limit between the parts. 4. Write - from the plan. 5. Check - task word, claim, length. The task word decides the shape: describe, explain, argue, narrate. Two to four developed supports beat seven listed ones. Never pad; develop. When a task has two task words, let one claim carry both. The garden answer was built from a four-line plan and landed near its limit. Next: from notes to paragraph.

From notes to paragraph

To expand notes into a paragraph, choose a claim, select the notes that serve it, order and develop them, and leave the rest out.

Claim, select, order, develop.

Claim: mangroves protect the coasts where they grow.
Selected: roots slow waves; cyclone damage reported less; nursery for fish.
Set aside: tourists; carbon; firewood and shrimp farms.
StepQuestionMangrove example
groupWhich notes point to the same idea?protection: waves, cyclones, fish
claimWhat one idea do they support?mangroves protect the coast
selectWhich notes serve the claim?three of seven
orderIn what order, and why?shore, then villages, then the sea
developHow does each note support the claim?roots slow waves, so less of the shore is worn away

This is the Paragraph Check used to build. Topic: the claim. Development: each note explained. Order: chosen for a reason. Boundary: the notes set aside.

Notes are compressed. Expanding them well means adding connection, never invention.

NoteListed (weak)Developed (strong)
roots slow waves - less erosionTheir roots slow waves.The tangle of roots slows incoming waves, so that less of the shore is worn away.
nursery for young fishThey are a nursery for fish.They serve as a nursery where young fish can grow in safety.
cyclone: less damage (reported)Cyclones do less damage.Villages behind thick mangroves have been reported to suffer less damage.

Notice three things. First, development adds the link the note left out - "so that less of the shore is worn away" - not a new fact. If you do not know a figure, do not supply one.

Second, keep the notes' hedges. A note that says "reported" or "some" or "may" records how certain the information is. Dropping the hedge turns a careful note into an overclaim.

Third, a note set aside is not wasted. The notes on carbon and on cutting for shrimp farms could become a second paragraph: mangroves are valuable, and they are under threat. Notes often hold two or three paragraphs; the first job is to see which notes belong together. Signal words such as so, too and when belong to Chapter 21; this section owns which notes become the paragraph.

Picture a cook given a basket of ingredients and asked for one dish. A poor cook throws everything into one pot - fish, mangoes, chocolate, rice - because it was all in the basket. A good cook first decides the dish: a fish curry. Then she takes the fish, the onions, the spices and the coconut, puts the mangoes and chocolate back for another day, and cooks the chosen ingredients in the order the recipe needs. The notes are the basket. The claim is the dish. The paragraph is what you cook.

Section 32 planned a paragraph from a task. This section builds one from notes - material someone else has gathered, or you have gathered in a hurry. It joins the development patterns of sections 22 to 26 to the selection judgement of section 29. Section 34 turns the process around: compressing a full paragraph back down to its one core idea. Section 40 asks you to do both without scaffolding.

Here is the case that takes judgement: notes that support two equally strong claims. Read these notes on a town's old market hall: - built 1890s, carved stone front - empty for ten years - roof leaking - town has no library - council short of money - local artists want studio space - many residents remember market days Two claims are possible. One: the hall should be saved because of its history - the stone front, residents' memories. Two: the hall should be reused because the town has needs it could meet - a library, artists' studios. Both are supported by several notes. Which should the paragraph use? First, check the task. If it asks why the hall matters, history is the stronger claim. If it asks what should be done with it, reuse is. The task decides, as in section 32. If the task leaves it open, choose the claim that more notes support directly, and that you can develop rather than list. Then check the notes that remain: "roof leaking" and "council short of money" support neither claim, but they matter to both. They may belong in a second paragraph about the obstacles. What you must not do is combine both claims into one paragraph and give each two short sentences. The test is not how many notes you use. It is whether one claim, fully developed, holds every sentence.

Did you know that one well-known note-taking method divides the page before any notes are written? The Cornell note-taking system, developed at Cornell University in the United States in the twentieth century, divides a page into a wide column for notes, a narrow column for key words or questions, and a space at the bottom for a short summary. The summary space asks the note-taker to do, in a few lines, what this section asks: find the main idea the notes add up to. The key-word column asks which notes belong together. The method is one of many, and students use it in different ways. But its shape makes a useful point: notes are not finished until someone has decided what they mean.

Some tasks ask you to use all the points given. Follow the instructions; then build the paragraph so the points serve one claim, in a purposeful order. Never add facts the notes do not give. Connection is development; invention is not. Keep every hedge the notes record. Notes often hold more than one paragraph. Group them first; set aside the notes that belong elsewhere.

  1. Read all the notes before writing anything.
  2. Group the notes that point to the same idea.
  3. Choose one group and write its idea as a claim.
  4. Check the task: it may decide which claim to choose.
  5. Select only the notes that serve the claim.
  6. Order them for a reason, not in the order they were written.
  7. Turn each note into a sentence that explains, not just states.
  8. Add connection, never invented facts.
  9. Keep every hedge: reported, some, may.
  10. Set aside the other notes for another paragraph, or for none at all.
Notes are raw material, not a script. Claim, select, order, develop: 1. Group the notes. 2. Choose a claim. 3. Select the notes that serve it. 4. Order them for a reason. 5. Develop each into an explained sentence. The mangrove paragraph used three of seven notes, ordered from shore to villages to sea, and set aside tourists, carbon and firewood. Add connection, never invention. Keep the hedges. When notes support two claims, let the task decide, then build one claim fully. The notes you set aside are not wasted; they may become the next paragraph. Next: summarising a paragraph.

Summarising a paragraph

A summary states the paragraph's one core idea in one sentence of your own, at the right size, with the examples left out.

Find the idea; state it at its size.

Not the first sentence: "Families used to keep photographs in albums."
Not a miniature: "Albums held few; phones hold thousands; some print again..."
The core idea: "The old album's limits made families choose what to remember, a choice phones have taken away."
SummaryProblem
one example ("Phones hold thousands of photos.")too narrow
the general topic ("Photographs are important.")too wide
a changed claim ("Phones have ruined family memories.")distorted
the first sentence copiedmay miss the idea
the core idea, in your own wordsright size

Summarising is the Topic question of the Paragraph Check run in reverse: instead of building from the idea, you recover it from the paragraph.

Four tests check a one-sentence summary.

TestQuestionAlbum example
coverageDoes it cover the whole paragraph?albums, phones, the return to printing, the choice
sizeDoes it go no wider than the paragraph?not 'photographs are important'
fidelityDoes it keep the claim's limits and tone?'some families', 'in a sense' - not 'phones ruin memories'
ownershipIs it in your own words, without examples?no dozens, no thousands, no pasting by hand

Notice three things. First, the idea can sit anywhere. In an expository paragraph it is usually first; in a paragraph that builds toward a point, like the album paragraph, it is last; in a narrative or descriptive paragraph it may be implied (section 21), and you must state it yourself.

Second, fidelity is easy to lose. Writers hedge on purpose - "in a sense", "some families" - and a summary that drops the hedge turns a careful thought into a claim the writer never made. This is the same rule as keeping hedges in notes (section 33), run the other way.

Third, a summary is not a judgement. "The writer makes a good point about albums" is a comment, not a summary. Whether the paragraph's argument is strong is Chapter 29's question; here, the job is to say what it says.

Picture boiling down a large pot of fruit into a small jar of jam. Nothing new goes in, and the water - the examples, the details, the repetitions - boils away. What is left is the same fruit, concentrated: the paragraph's idea, at full strength, in a much smaller space. A summary that adds sugar of its own is no longer the same jam. A summary that keeps one strawberry and throws away the rest is not jam at all. And a jar labelled simply 'fruit' tells you nothing about what is inside.

Section 21 named implied ideas, and section 33 built a paragraph up from notes. This section runs the process the other way: it reduces a finished paragraph to its core. Section 35 uses the same skill to revise: you cannot cut what breaks a draft's unity until you can state the idea it should serve. Section 39 summarises a published paragraph as part of close reading.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph that seems to make two points, where the summary must find how they connect. Read this: "Many towns are planting trees along their streets to keep pavements cool in summer. The trees bring other changes too: shaded streets are often quieter, and some residents report spending more time outdoors. Yet street trees need years of care before they give much shade, and young trees often die in their first dry season." The paragraph says that street trees bring benefits, and also that they take time and care. Is the summary two sentences? Ask how the points relate. The last sentence begins with "Yet" and qualifies the benefits; it does not start a new subject. The core idea is the balance: street trees can cool and improve streets, but only with years of care. A one-sentence summary can hold that balance: "Street trees can cool and improve town streets, but only if young trees survive the years of care they need." A summary that keeps only the benefits - "Street trees cool streets and make people spend more time outside" - drops the qualification and distorts the paragraph. One that keeps only the problem - "Young street trees often die" - is too narrow. The test is whether the summary keeps the relationship between the points - here, benefit qualified by cost - as well as the points themselves. If the paragraph balances, the summary must balance.

Did you know that one of the oldest forms of writing advice in English is a demand for summaries? For centuries, students in English schools practised a task called précis, from a French word meaning precise: reducing a passage to a fraction of its length while keeping its meaning. Précis writing was a standard exercise in many schools and was used in examinations for some public services in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The exercise trained exactly the judgement this section teaches: what is the core, what is an example, and what is only decoration. The word is less common now, but the skill has spread everywhere: in the abstract at the top of a research article, the summary at the start of a report, and the one-line preview under an email's subject.

Some tasks ask for a summary of a set length or in a set number of points. Follow the instructions; the core-idea test still applies. The idea may be stated first, stated last, or implied. Read the whole paragraph before deciding. Keep the paragraph's hedges and its balance. A qualified claim must stay qualified. A summary says what the paragraph says. Judging whether its argument is strong is Chapter 29's work.

  1. Read the whole paragraph before you write.
  2. Do not assume the first sentence holds the idea.
  3. Ask the Topic question: what is the one idea, stated or implied?
  4. Write it in one sentence, in your own words.
  5. Leave out examples, figures and details.
  6. Check coverage: does it cover the whole paragraph?
  7. Check size: does it go no wider than the paragraph?
  8. Keep hedges such as 'some', 'many' and 'in a sense'.
  9. Keep any balance or qualification between points.
  10. Say what the paragraph says; do not comment on it.
A summary is the paragraph's one core idea, in one sentence of your own. It is not the first sentence, not one vivid example, and not a miniature of every sentence. Four tests: 1. Coverage - the whole paragraph. 2. Size - no wider than the paragraph. 3. Fidelity - hedges and balance kept. 4. Ownership - your words, no examples. The album paragraph's idea sat in its last sentence: the old album's limits made families choose what to remember. If a paragraph balances benefit and cost, the summary must balance too. Next: revising for unity.

Revising for unity

To revise for unity, state the idea first, then test every sentence against it: cut, move or keep.

Idea first; then cut, move or keep.

Idea: learning to cook taught me more than recipes - above all, that I could care for others.
(4) Cooking is a popular hobby with many TV programmes - C: about cooking in general.
(7) My brother prefers to bake cakes - M: to a paragraph about the family, or C.
MarkWhenExample
C - cutthe sentence serves no idea in the piececooking on television
M - moveit serves a different paragraph's ideathe brother's cakes, to a family paragraph
K - keepit seems odd but serves the ideathe grandmother in the doorway: her trust is part of the lesson

This is the Boundary question of the Paragraph Check used to revise: anything outside the idea goes, unless it earns its place.

Three habits make unity revision work.

HabitWhyCooking draft
state the idea firstyou cannot judge belonging without itmore than recipes; caring for others
mark before you rewritepolishing a sentence makes it harder to cutC, M and K marks made before any rewording
justify each marka reason can be checked; a feeling cannot(4) C: about cooking in general, not this writer's lesson

Notice three things. First, the hardest sentences to cut are your own good ones. Sentence 4 is true and well written; it still does not belong. Unity is not about quality.

Second, a sentence that seems odd may still serve. The grandmother in the doorway does not mention cooking skills, but her not taking the spoon is part of why the writer learned. That is a K, like the cricket contrast in section 21: it is tied to the idea.

Third, cutting can reveal other problems. Once sentences 4 and 7 are gone, it is easier to see that sentence 6 is out of place. Revise for unity first, then for order (section 36), then for wording. Sentence-level polishing belongs to Chapters 20, 23 and 24.

Picture tidying a single drawer meant for kitchen tools. You tip everything out onto the table first. Then you pick up each item and ask one question: is this a kitchen tool? The spoon, the ladle and the peeler go back in. The birthday candle goes to the drawer for party things. The broken pen goes in the bin. The odd-looking nutmeg grater, which you almost threw away, turns out to be a kitchen tool after all, and goes back. Only when the drawer holds the right things do you arrange them neatly.

Section 34 summarised a paragraph to its one core idea. This section uses that summary as the standard for revision: every sentence must serve the idea, or go. Section 36 revises for order, the natural next pass. Section 31 ran the full Paragraph Check on others' paragraphs; here you run it on your own draft, which is harder. Section 40 asks you to build, revise and defend a paragraph unaided.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a sentence that does not serve the paragraph's idea, but is the best sentence in the draft. Read this, from a draft about a school trip to the coast: "(1) The trip taught us how a fishing harbour works. (2) We watched boats unload their catch before dawn. (3) A trader showed us how the fish are sorted by size and sold by auction. (4) On the way home, the sun set over the water, turning the whole bay copper, and for a moment nobody on the bus spoke. (5) By the end, we understood how the fish on our plates had reached us." Sentence 4 is the most vivid in the paragraph. It is not about how the harbour works. Run the test honestly. The idea is understanding the harbour's work. The sunset is about a moment of beauty on the way home. It does not serve the idea, however good it is. The writer has three honest choices. Cut it, and accept the loss. Move it to a different paragraph whose idea it serves - perhaps a closing paragraph about what the trip meant beyond the lesson. Or rethink the paragraph's idea, if the writer decides the trip's real point was wonder, not harbours - and then the auction sentence is the one that must go. What the writer must not do is keep it because it is good. The test is never "is this my best sentence?" It is "does this sentence serve the idea?" A sentence that does not belong is not improved by being beautiful; it is only harder to cut.

Did you know that a well-known piece of writing advice tells writers to cut the sentences they love most? The advice is often given as "murder your darlings". It comes from a lecture on writing by the English writer Arthur Quiller-Couch, published in the early twentieth century, in which he advised writers to delete passages they found especially fine, before sending the work out. The phrase has been repeated and adapted by many writers since, and is sometimes wrongly credited to others. The point is not that good sentences are bad. It is that a writer's affection for a sentence is no evidence that it belongs. The more a writer loves a line, the less able they are to judge it fairly. Revising for unity puts that advice into practice: the darling must serve the idea, or go.

Unity revision is the first pass, not the only one. Revise for order next (section 36), then for wording. A sentence that seems odd may serve the idea, as a contrast or as context. Test it before cutting. Moving is better than cutting only if the sentence truly serves the other paragraph. Spelling, grammar, wordiness and rhythm are later passes owned by Chapters 23, 20 and 24.

  1. State the paragraph's idea in one sentence before revising.
  2. Number the sentences so that you can mark each one.
  3. Test each sentence: does it serve this idea?
  4. Mark C (cut), M (move - say where) or K (keep).
  5. Make every mark before rewriting any sentence.
  6. Give each mark a reason that names the idea.
  7. Keep a contrast that is tied to the idea.
  8. Do not keep a sentence because it is your best one.
  9. Move a sentence only to a paragraph it truly serves.
  10. Re-read the whole paragraph and run the full check after the cuts.
Revising for unity comes before polishing. 1. State the idea. 2. Number the sentences. 3. Test each against the idea. 4. Mark C, M or K, with a reason. 5. Re-read and re-check. In the cooking draft, the television sentence was cut, the brother's cakes were moved or cut, and the grandmother in the doorway was kept, because her trust served the idea. The hardest cuts are your best sentences. A sentence does not belong because it is beautiful; it belongs because it serves the idea. And cutting often reveals the next problem, so re-read before you polish. Next: revising for order.

Revising for order

To revise for order, name the sequence the paragraph's job needs, then use the clues to rebuild it.

Name the order; follow the clues.

Job: explain a problem and propose a fix.
Order: problem, cause, effect, consequence, solution.
Clue: "As a result" must follow the cause it points back to.
JobOrder it usually needs
tell what happenedtime order
describe a placespatial order
explain an ideageneral to specific
make a caseorder of importance
explain whycause to effect
propose a fixproblem to solution

This is the Order question of the Paragraph Check used to revise: can a reader say why these sentences sit in this sequence? If not, rebuild until they can.

Clues in the sentences themselves often fix their positions.

ClueWhat it tells youExample
a word pointing backsomething must come before itAs a result... / This meant... / They...
a time or place wordits place in a sequenceFor weeks... / By morning... / Behind the house...
a general statementoften the openingOur lane floods every monsoon, and the cause is simple.
a proposal or judgementoften the closeClearing the drain each month would stop it.

Notice three things. First, words that point back are the strongest clues. "As a result" cannot open a paragraph; "they" needs a noun before it. Moving a sentence can break these links, so check them after every move.

Second, some paragraphs allow more than one good order. A case can be made with the strongest reason first or last; a description can sweep left to right or near to far. Choose one and keep to it. The test is whether a reader can say why.

Third, reordering does not mean rewriting. Change the sequence first; only if a link is still broken should you adjust a word. The signal words themselves, and given-before-new order inside sentences, belong to Chapter 21; this section owns the order of whole sentences.

Picture a train being coupled in a siding. Each carriage has a coupling at the front and one at the back. Some couplings only fit one way: a carriage marked 'as a result' can only hook onto the carriage of its cause. The engine - the topic sentence - goes at the front, and the guard's van - the close - at the back. A train with every right carriage but in the wrong order cannot move: the couplings do not meet. Revising for order is shunting the carriages until every coupling clicks.

Discover and Practice taught time, space and general-to-specific order; Craft added cause and effect, importance and comparison. Section 35 revised for unity. This section is the second pass: with every sentence belonging, put them in the order the job needs. Section 37 shows how the same orders shift across genres, and section 38 runs reordering under exam conditions.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph where two orders compete, and the writer must choose. Read these sentences, in no particular order, for a paragraph arguing that a town should keep its swimming pool open in winter: "(a) Closing it would take away the safest exercise many older residents have. (b) The pool costs the council money to heat. (c) Swimming is gentle on the joints. (d) Older residents use it when the paths are too icy to walk. (e) The council should keep the pool open through the winter." One possible order is time and cause: the problem (cost), then the residents, then the conclusion. Another is importance: the point first, then the reasons building to the strongest - the loss of safe exercise - then the cost answered last. Which is right? Run the Order question with the job in mind. The paragraph's job is to persuade (section 23). A persuasive paragraph usually states its point early and builds to its strongest support. So: e, c, d, a - and b, the cost, either set aside for another paragraph or placed where it can be answered. Notice that b is the hard one. It belongs to the topic, but it argues against the point. If it stays, it needs a place where the paragraph can respond to it - and responding to objections is Chapter 29's territory. If the paragraph is simply making its case, b may be better moved to a paragraph that weighs the costs. The test is not whether a sentence fits somewhere. It is whether the order serves the paragraph's job, and whether a reader could say why each sentence comes where it does.

Did you know that reordering scrambled sentences is a long-standing exercise in language teaching and testing? In one common form, learners are given the sentences of a paragraph in a jumbled order and asked to restore the original. The task appears in many classrooms and some reading tests, because it checks whether a reader can see how sentences connect, not just what each one says. The clues learners use are the ones in this section: words that point back, time and place markers, and the difference between general statements and specific details. Writers can use the same exercise on their own drafts. Cut a paragraph into slips, shuffle them, and rebuild it. If two different orders both seem to work, ask which one serves the paragraph's job better.

Revise for order only after unity; a sentence that does not belong has no right place. Some paragraphs allow more than one good order. Choose one that serves the job and keep to it. Moving a sentence can strand a word that points back. Check every link after every move. Adjust wording only if a link is still broken after reordering. Signal words and sentence-level order belong to Chapter 21; answering objections belongs to Chapter 29.

  1. Confirm that every sentence belongs before reordering.
  2. Name the paragraph's job and the order it needs.
  3. Find the opening: usually the most general sentence.
  4. Find the close: often a proposal, judgement or result.
  5. Use words that point back to fix what must come before.
  6. Use time and place words to fix sequence.
  7. Keep to one order; do not mix two.
  8. Check every pointing word after each move.
  9. Reorder before rewriting; change words only to mend a link.
  10. Read the rebuilt paragraph aloud: does each sentence lead to the next?
Sentences that all belong can still be in the wrong order. Revising for order: 1. Confirm unity first. 2. Name the job and its order. 3. Find the opening and the close. 4. Follow the clues: words that point back, time and place words. 5. Rebuild, then check every link. The flooded-lane paragraph moved from solution-first chaos to problem, cause, effect, consequence, solution, with no word changed. When two orders compete, choose the one that serves the paragraph's job. Reorder before you rewrite. Next: the same move in different genres.

The same move, different genres

The Paragraph Check is the same in every genre; its answers shift with the reader and the job.

Same four questions, different answers.

Story: implied idea, sensory detail, time order.
Essay: stated claim, evidence and explanation, cause to effect.
Letter body: stated concern, evidence, then a request.
Report: stated observation, facts, order of finding, no opinion.
GenreTopicDevelopmentOrderOff the idea
narrativeoften impliedaction, sensory detailtimeexplanation that tells what details show
exam essaystated claimevidence, explanationgeneral to specific, cause to effecta story that never returns to the claim
formal letter bodystated concernevidence, then a requestconcern to requestunrelated complaints
reportstated findingobserved factsorder of finding or sequenceopinion and persuasion

Every row is the Paragraph Check. The questions do not change; the reader does.

The same idea can be carried by different moves in different genres.

MoveStoryEssayLetter bodyReport
how the flood is shown"By two o'clock the lane was a river""the water rises into the houses within an hour""flooding in six homes this monsoon""Water rose to about thirty centimetres within an hour"
what the paragraph asks of the readerto feelto understandto actto know

Notice three things. First, the genre decides what counts as off the idea. A request belongs in a letter and breaks a report. An opinion belongs in an essay's claim and breaks a report's findings. A sentence that explains a feeling belongs in an essay and can flatten a story.

Second, borrowed shapes are the commonest genre error. A report paragraph that ends "This shows how terrible the flooding was" has borrowed an essay's closing judgement. A story paragraph that opens "Flooding has many causes" has borrowed an essay's topic sentence.

Third, this section does not teach formats. Where a letter's address goes, how it is signed, and which register it uses are Chapter 22's. How whole essays and reports are assembled is Chapter 30's. Here, the question is only how one paragraph's architecture serves its genre.

Picture the same set of four tools - a measuring tape, a saw, a plane and a level - used by four different workers. The carpenter making a chair, the builder framing a wall, the boat-maker shaping a hull and the inspector checking a doorway all use the same four tools. But each uses them differently, to a different standard, for a different result. Nobody would say the inspector is using the saw wrongly because he barely uses it. The Paragraph Check is the toolset. Each genre is a different worker.

Earlier sections built paragraphs for one job at a time: narrative and descriptive in Practice, expository and persuasive in Craft, with implied topics in section 21. Sections 31 to 36 ran and applied the full Paragraph Check. This section puts the genres side by side to show what changes and what does not. Section 38 runs the check under exam conditions, and Chapter 30 assembles whole pieces in each genre.

Here is the case that takes judgement: a paragraph that mixes genres on purpose, and must still serve one job. Read this, from a letter to a newspaper about the flooded lane: "At two o'clock on a July night, I sat on my roof with my children and listened to our lane turn into a river. That flood was not bad luck. The corner drain had been blocked for weeks, and residents had reported it twice. I urge the council to clear it monthly before another family spends a night on its roof." It opens with a story, moves into an essay's cause, and ends with a letter's request. Is that a genre muddle? Run the Topic question on the job. The paragraph's job is a letter's: to move a reader to act. Its one idea is that the flood was preventable and the council should act. The story is not decoration; it is evidence, chosen to make the reader feel what the request is for. The cause is the reasoning. The request is the point. Every move serves the letter's job. Compare a muddle: "At two o'clock I sat on the roof. The stars were beautiful that night, and I remembered my grandmother's stories. Drains should be cleared." Here the story drifts into its own world and the request arrives with no link to it. The test is not whether one genre's moves appear inside another's. It is whether every move serves the paragraph's one job. Writers borrow moves all the time; the borrowed move must work for the host genre.

Did you know that the paragraph itself looks different in different kinds of writing published in the same week? A novel may run a single paragraph across a page, carrying a scene through many sentences. A newspaper may break a report into paragraphs of one or two sentences, because narrow columns and quick reading demand it. A scientific article may use dense paragraphs, each one holding a method or a finding. A legal document may number its paragraphs so that each can be referred to exactly. None of these is wrong. Each paragraph shape serves the reader the genre expects: the novel's reader is immersed, the newspaper's reader skims, the scientist's reader checks, the lawyer's reader cites. That is this section's point. The unit of thought is the same; its size, order and development are fitted to the job.

The four questions never change; their answers do. Judge a paragraph by its own genre's job. Writers borrow moves across genres on purpose. A borrowed move must serve the host genre's job. This section does not teach formats. Letter layout and register are Chapter 22's; assembling whole essays and reports is Chapter 30's. Genres are not ranked (stance 7). A story paragraph without a topic sentence is not a weaker paragraph; it is a story paragraph.

  1. Name the genre, the reader and the job before you write or judge.
  2. Decide whether the topic should be stated or can be implied.
  3. Choose development that suits the reader: detail, evidence, request or observation.
  4. Choose the order the genre's job needs.
  5. Decide what counts as off the idea in this genre.
  6. Keep opinion out of report paragraphs.
  7. End a letter's body paragraph with what you are asking for, when you are asking.
  8. Return an essay's anecdote to the claim it supports.
  9. Let a story's details carry its idea; do not explain them away.
  10. Borrow moves only when they serve the host genre's job.
The Paragraph Check is the same in every genre; its answers shift. 1. Story - implied idea, sensory detail, time order. 2. Essay - stated claim, evidence and explanation, cause or general to specific. 3. Letter body - stated concern, evidence, a request. 4. Report - stated finding, facts, order of finding, no opinion. The flooded lane was a river at two o'clock, a cause to explain, a request to the council, and a measurement of thirty centimetres. The genre decides what counts as off the idea. Borrowed moves must serve the host genre. Genres are not ranked. Next: the check under exam conditions.

Paragraph architecture under exam conditions

Under exam conditions, check before you add. Run the Paragraph Check fast, then make the few fixes that matter most.

Re-read the task; check fast; fix small.

Task: one way to reduce waste.
Check: the opening names no way; two ways are offered; the uncle is a stray.
Fix: a new topic sentence; cut the uncle; cut the second way.
PriorityProblemSmallest fix
1the opening does not answer the taskrewrite one sentence as the topic sentence
2a sentence is off the taskcut it
3the task's limit is broken (two ways when asked for one)cut the extra
4no closeadd one closing sentence, if time allows

This is the full Paragraph Check of section 31, at the speed of section 32's plan, aimed at the exact task.

Time decides what you can fix. Use a simple rule for the last minutes.

Time leftWhat to do
five minutes or morerun the full check; fix the opening, cut strays, develop one thin support
two to four minutescheck the opening against the task; cut strays and extras
under two minutesmake sure the first sentence answers the task; cut any obvious stray

Notice three things. First, the task is the standard. Re-read it before you check, because exam drafts drift. "Explain one way" is broken by two ways, however good both are.

Second, cuts are the fastest fixes and often the most valuable. A stray removed costs seconds and improves unity at once. Adding a sentence costs more time and may add a new problem.

Third, the topic sentence is the highest-value sentence in an exam paragraph. If it answers the task, a reader knows at once that the paragraph is on target; if it does not, even a good body may be read as off-task. That is why it comes first in the priorities. Whether a given assessment rewards particular features is something to learn from the instructions you are given; this section describes the architecture, not any marking scheme.

Picture a pilot's final check before landing. There is no time to redesign the aircraft. The pilot runs a short, fixed list: wheels down, flaps set, runway clear. Each item takes seconds, and each one, if missed, matters more than anything else that could be done in that time. The last minutes of an exam paragraph are the same: not a time to build more, but a time to check the few things that, if wrong, would cost the most.

Section 32 planned an exam paragraph before writing. This section checks and fixes it at the end, against the same task. It draws on section 31's full check, section 35's unity revision and section 36's order revision, compressed to the minutes an exam allows. Section 39 slows down again for close reading, and section 40 asks for a full, unaided performance.

Here is the case that takes judgement: two problems, and time to fix only one. The task: "In about 80 words, describe a place that is important to you." With ninety seconds left, the paragraph reads: "Places are important to everyone. My grandmother's veranda is where I spent every summer evening as a child. The swing creaked, the jasmine smelled sweet, and she told stories until the lamps were lit. I also love the school library, which is quiet and has many books." Two problems. The opening is a warm-up that describes no place. And the last sentence adds a second place, which the task ("a place") did not ask for. Ninety seconds is enough for one fix. Which one? Weigh them. The warm-up opening wastes the first sentence, but the second sentence names the place clearly, so a reader still finds the topic quickly. The library sentence breaks the task's limit - one place - and leaves the reader at the end with the wrong place in mind. It also takes seconds to cut. Cut the library sentence. The paragraph now describes one place, ends on the veranda, and only its first sentence is weak. If ten seconds remain, delete "Places are important to everyone" too; the second sentence can open. The test is which fix removes the bigger risk for the time it costs. A cut that restores the task's limit usually beats a rewrite that only improves the opening, when time is short.

Did you know that the habit of a final check is built into many professions where there is no second chance? Pilots run landing checklists. Surgeons and nurses in many hospitals pause before an operation to confirm the patient, the procedure and the site. Newspaper sub-editors read a story one last time before it goes to print, looking not at every word but at the few things that would matter most if wrong: names, numbers, the headline. What these checks share is that they are short, fixed and prioritised. Nobody re-does the whole job; they look for the few errors that would cost most, in the time that remains. The last-minutes Paragraph Check is the same kind of habit: a short, fixed list, run against the task, every time.

Leave time to check; a tenth of the paragraph's time is a reasonable guide, not a rule. Fix in priority order: opening, strays, the task's limits, close. Stop when time runs out. Use cuts and single-sentence rewrites; do not start new sections in the last minutes. Assessments differ in what they reward and how they apply limits; follow the instructions you are given. Spelling and punctuation checks are later passes owned by Chapters 23 and 25.

  1. Plan to leave a short block of time at the end for checking.
  2. Re-read the task before checking: topic, task word, limit, and any 'one'.
  3. Run the four questions fast, marking problems in the margin.
  4. Fix the opening first if it does not answer the task.
  5. Cut any sentence that is off the task.
  6. Cut extras that break the task's limit.
  7. Add a close only if time allows.
  8. Prefer cuts and one-sentence rewrites to new writing.
  9. When time allows only one fix, choose the one that removes the bigger risk.
  10. Stop when time runs out; a clean, shorter paragraph beats an unfinished longer one.
Under exam conditions, check before you add. 1. Re-read the task. 2. Run the four questions fast. 3. Fix in order: opening, strays, the task's limits, close. 4. Use cuts and one-sentence rewrites. The waste paragraph got a new topic sentence, lost the uncle, and lost the second way the task never asked for: shorter, and more exactly on the task. With time for one fix, choose the one that removes the bigger risk - often a cut that restores the task's limit. A clean, shorter paragraph beats an unfinished longer one. Next: close reading.

Close reading: how a paragraph is built

Close reading uses the Paragraph Check as a reader's tool: name the topic, the job of each sentence, the order, and why the paragraph is its length.

Dickens, A Christmas Carol (1843), Stave One, opening paragraph.

Claim: "Marley was dead: to begin with."
Evidence: "The register of his burial was signed by the clergyman, the clerk, the undertaker, and the chief mourner."
Restatement: "Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail."
SentenceJob
1. Marley was dead: to begin with.claim (topic sentence)
2. There is no doubt whatever about that.insistence
3. The register of his burial was signed...evidence
4. Scrooge signed it...the strongest evidence
5. Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail.restatement, a closing move

Every row is one of the Paragraph Check's questions turned into an observation a reader can check against the page.

Two more paragraphs show different architectures for different jobs.

TextTopicOrderLength
Lincoln, the Gettysburg Address (1863), second paragraph (Bliss copy)the occasion: why the listeners are gatheredgeneral to specific - a nation at war, a battlefield, a portion of that field - then a judgementfour sentences: three narrowing toward the place where the listeners stand, then a judgement
Austen, Pride and Prejudice (1813), opening paragrapha 'truth' about wealthy single mena single sentenceone sentence: the claim is complete, and the irony needs the following paragraphs to unfold

Lincoln's paragraph: "Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this."

Austen's paragraph: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."

Notice three things. First, Lincoln's order narrows in space: from the war, to "a great battle-field of that war", to "a portion of that field". Each sentence takes the listener closer to the ground beneath their feet, and the last sentence judges the act of dedication itself.

Second, Austen's paragraph is a single sentence, and that is a length decision, not a mistake (stance 5). Its claim is stated as a universal truth, but the novel that follows suggests the 'truth' is gently mocked; the paragraph's full idea is implied by what comes after (stance 2).

Third, close reading reports what the words show. Saying that Lincoln's paragraph narrows is checkable on the page; claiming to know what he felt as he wrote it is not. Interpreting a writer's figures of speech, such as "as dead as a door-nail", belongs to Chapter 26; this section reads the architecture.

Picture an architect walking through a famous old building with a notebook. She does not simply admire it. She notes where the main door is, how the corridors lead from it, why the great hall sits at the centre, and where the building ends. Each note is checkable: anyone can walk the same corridor. Close reading a paragraph is that walk: the topic is the door, the development is the corridors, the order is the plan, and the length is where the walls stop.

Every earlier section built or revised paragraphs. This section turns the Paragraph Check into a reader's tool, applied to published paragraphs quoted exactly. It draws on topic sentences (Practice), implied ideas (section 21), development by evidence (section 22), closing moves (section 28), length as judgement (section 29) and summary (section 34). Section 40 asks you to build and defend your own paragraph with the same eye, and Chapter 28 turns from architecture to a writer's voice.

Here is the case that takes the most judgement: a one-sentence paragraph whose idea is not what it seems to say. Read Jane Austen's opening again: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife." Run the Topic question literally. The sentence states a claim: everyone agrees that a rich single man must want a wife. Is that the paragraph's idea? Read the word choices closely. The phrase "a truth universally acknowledged" is grand for what is really a piece of social gossip. The sentence puts the wanting on the man, while the novel's first chapter soon shows a mother eager to marry her daughters to him. A careful reader begins to suspect that the 'truth' is being presented with a raised eyebrow. So the paragraph's idea may be implied rather than stated: not that rich men want wives, but that society likes to dress its own wishes up as universal truths. A summary must be careful here. "Austen says rich men want wives" reports the words but may miss the idea; "Austen opens with a mock-solemn 'truth' that the novel goes on to question" is closer, and is supported by what follows. Notice what this does to Length. One sentence is enough, because the paragraph's job is to plant the claim; the following chapters develop and test it. The test is not only what a paragraph's sentence says, but what the whole text shows that sentence is doing. Close reading keeps both in view, and supports every claim with the words on the page.

Did you know that there are several handwritten copies of the Gettysburg Address, and that their wording is not identical? Abraham Lincoln gave the address in November 1863 at the dedication of a soldiers' cemetery. Five copies in Lincoln's hand are known, usually named after the people they were given to. They differ in small ways: a word here, a phrase there. The Bliss copy, written out later, is the one Lincoln signed and dated, and it has often been treated as a standard text. That is why the second paragraph in this section is quoted from it, and named. For a close reader, this is a lesson in exactness. When you quote a text, say which version you are quoting, and quote it exactly. A single word can change how a paragraph's architecture is read.

Quote exactly, including punctuation and spelling, and name the edition or copy when versions differ. Report what the words show. Do not claim knowledge of a writer's feelings or intentions that the text does not support. Great paragraphs are not judged against one template. A one-sentence paragraph can be a deliberate length decision. Figures of speech such as 'as dead as a door-nail' belong to Chapter 26; a writer's distinctive voice belongs to Chapter 28. This section reads the paragraph's architecture.

  1. Read the paragraph twice: for sense, then slowly.
  2. State its idea in one sentence of your own.
  3. Decide whether the topic is stated or implied, and where.
  4. Number the sentences and name each one's job.
  5. Name the order and say why it suits the paragraph's purpose.
  6. Ask why the paragraph ends where it does.
  7. Quote exactly, including punctuation.
  8. Name the edition or copy when versions differ.
  9. Support every observation with words on the page.
  10. Prefer checkable observations to general praise.
Close reading turns the Paragraph Check into a reader's tool. 1. Topic - stated or implied, and where. 2. Development - each sentence's job. 3. Order - and why it suits the purpose. 4. Length - why it ends where it does. Dickens: claim, insistence, evidence, the strongest evidence, restatement - "as dead as a door-nail". Lincoln: general to specific, narrowing from a nation at war to the ground beneath the listeners' feet. Austen: one sentence, a mock-solemn 'truth' whose irony the novel unfolds. Quote exactly. Report what the words show. Next: independent performance.

Independent performance

Independent performance means planning, writing, checking and defending a paragraph with no scaffolding: the whole chapter, used together.

Plan, write, check, defend.

Task: one way to make the walk to school safer.
Plan: claim - a marked crossing; chain - visibility, slowing, walking, fewer cars; close - protection twice over.
Defence: "I kept to one way because the task says one."
StageWhat you doSections it draws on
plantopic, task word, limits; four-line plan22, 24, 32
writeclaim first, chain in order, a closing move23 to 28
checkthe full Paragraph Check; cut before adding31, 35, 36, 38
defenda reason for each choice, naming the task or a question31

The Paragraph Check runs through every stage: Topic and Development shape the plan, Order shapes the writing, Boundary shapes the check, and all four supply the defence.

A defence is what turns a good paragraph into a demonstrated skill. Each sentence of it names a choice and a reason.

ChoiceWeak defenceStrong defence
claim firstIt sounded good.The task word is explain, so the reader needs the claim stated first.
one way onlyI ran out of ideas.The task asks for one way; a second would break its limit.
chain orderThat is how I thought of it.Each effect causes the next, so the order is the chain.
this lengthIt reached the limit.The chain needed four links and a close; nothing more served the idea.

Notice three things. First, a strong defence can be checked. Anyone can look at the task and see that it says one way; anyone can follow the chain. A weak defence reports a feeling.

Second, defending your choices often finds a weakness. If you cannot say why a sentence is there, the Boundary question may be telling you it should not be.

Third, architecture is not the whole of writing. Two learners could build the same paragraph architecture and sound completely different, because their word choices, rhythms and personalities differ. That is voice and style, the subject of Chapter 28. This chapter has given you the building; the next asks how you live in it.

Picture an apprentice carpenter on the day she makes her first piece of furniture alone. For months she has practised joints, measured cuts and sanded edges, each in a separate lesson. Now there is no lesson: only a request for a chair, a pile of wood and her tools. She plans the chair, cuts and joins it, checks that it stands level, and then explains to her teacher why each joint is where it is. The chair is the paragraph. The explanation is the defence. The lessons are this chapter.

This is the chapter's last section. Discover taught grouping and order; Practice, topic sentences and development; Craft, patterns, openings, closings, splitting and bridging; Master, the full check, exam tasks, notes, summaries, revision, genres and close reading. Here they combine in one unaided performance. Chapter 28, Voice & Style, comes next: once you can build a paragraph, the question becomes how it sounds and whose it is. Chapter 30 will assemble whole pieces from paragraphs built this way.

Here is the case that takes the most judgement: defending a choice that breaks a pattern this chapter taught. Suppose the task is: "Write a paragraph for a story about a child's first walk to school alone." A learner writes: "The gate clicked shut behind her. Ten steps, and the house was gone behind the neem tree. At the crossing, she stood exactly where her mother always stood, and waited for the stripes to stop the cars. They did. On the far side, she did not look back." There is no topic sentence. There is no closing restatement. A reader trained only on expository paragraphs might call it unbuilt. Now hear the defence: "The task is a story, so I let the details carry the idea - her growing independence - instead of stating it (section 21). The order is time, because the walk is a sequence. The close, 'she did not look back', finishes the idea by showing it, which suits a story better than restating it (section 28). Every sentence is part of the walk, so nothing strays." Every choice is defended by the task and the four questions. The paragraph breaks the expository pattern because the genre asked it to (section 37). The test of independent performance is not whether a paragraph follows a pattern from this chapter. It is whether the writer chose the architecture for the task and can say why.

Did you know that many traditional crafts have long ended an apprenticeship with a single piece of independent work? In some European craft guilds of the past, an apprentice or journeyman could be asked to produce a 'masterpiece' - originally a piece of work submitted to show that they had mastered the craft and could be trusted to work on their own. The word has since come to mean any outstanding work of art, but its older sense was closer to an examination. The idea was simple: practice is done in parts, under guidance; mastery is shown in a whole, alone, and judged by others who know the craft. This section is that kind of test for the paragraph. Not a perfect paragraph, but one built by you, for a task, and defended as a whole.

There is no single correct paragraph for an open task. Different architectures can succeed if each is chosen for the task and defended. A defence names reasons that can be checked: the task's words or the four questions. Run the check even on a planned paragraph; drafts drift. Architecture is not everything. How a paragraph sounds - its voice and style - is Chapter 28's subject; assembling whole pieces is Chapter 30's.

  1. Underline the task's topic, task word and limits.
  2. Choose the architecture the task needs, not a fixed template.
  3. Write a four-line plan before writing.
  4. State the claim first in an explaining or arguing task; let a story's details carry its idea.
  5. Develop with the pattern the idea needs: examples, reasons, a chain, a comparison.
  6. Order for the reader: chain, time, space, importance.
  7. Close without opening a new idea.
  8. Run the full Paragraph Check on your draft and cut before adding.
  9. Defend each choice with a reason that names the task or a question.
  10. If you cannot defend a sentence, test whether it belongs.
Independent performance: plan, write, check, defend. 1. Plan - topic, task word, limits; claim, development, order, close. 2. Write - from the plan. 3. Check - the full Paragraph Check; cut before adding. 4. Defend - a reason for each choice, naming the task or a question. The crossing paragraph opened with its claim, kept to one way, ordered its effects as a chain and closed with protection twice over. A story paragraph may break the expository pattern if the genre asks it to - and the defence says why. Chapter complete. Next: Chapter 28, Voice & Style.

Common questions about paragraph architecture

What is a paragraph?
A paragraph is a group of sentences about one idea. One sentence usually states the idea, and the others tell more about it. When the idea changes, a new paragraph begins, shown by an indent or a blank line. The test for any sentence is simple: does it belong to this idea?
What is a topic sentence?
A topic sentence states what the whole paragraph is about. It often comes first, as in "Our school garden is a busy place", and every other sentence then adds detail to it. It can also come last or in the middle, and some story paragraphs leave it out on purpose and let the details carry the idea.
What is the Paragraph Check?
Four questions, in order. Topic: what is the one idea? Development: does every other sentence add an example, a reason, a fact, a detail or a next step? Order: could a reader say why the sentences sit in this sequence? Boundary: has a second idea crept in, or is the idea still thin? Then decide: keep, develop, reorder or split.
How long should a paragraph be?
Long enough to develop its one idea, and no longer. There is no fixed number of words or sentences. A paragraph is too long when a second idea has crept in, and too short when its idea is stated but never supported. Newspapers, novels and essays use different typical lengths for different readers.
When should I start a new paragraph?
Start a new paragraph when the idea changes. In a long paragraph, name the first idea in a short phrase, then find the first sentence that phrase no longer covers. If the sentences after it develop a new idea, split there. If only one sentence strays, cut or move it instead of giving it a paragraph of its own.
How do I write a good body paragraph for an essay?
State one claim, usually first. Give evidence: a fact, an example or a detail. Explain how the evidence supports the claim, because facts alone leave the reader to make the link. Close by drawing the point together without adding a new idea. Cut any sentence that is true but does not support this claim.
Does every paragraph need a topic sentence?
No. Many story and descriptive paragraphs never state their idea; every detail carries it together, as a kicked-off slipper and spilled milk can show that someone left in a hurry. An implied topic is not a missing one. In essays and reports, though, state the idea so the reader cannot miss it.
How do I find the sentence that does not belong in a paragraph?
Name the paragraph's one idea first. Then test each sentence: does it tell more about that idea? A sentence can share the paragraph's topic and still miss its idea, such as a line about a library's history in a paragraph about what libraries offer today. That sentence is the one to cut or move.
What is the PEEL paragraph structure?
PEEL stands for Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link. It is one common classroom memory aid for a persuasive or analytical paragraph: state your point, support it, explain how the support backs it, and link back to the point, sharpened. Other aids, such as PEE, use different letters; the bones of the paragraph are the same.
How do I write an introduction paragraph?
Build three parts. A hook draws the reader in and leads toward your point: a scene, a question, a true fact or a contrast. Context gives what the reader needs, in a sentence or two. A purpose statement says what the piece will argue or explain. Avoid warm-ups such as "Since the beginning of time".
How do I write a conclusion paragraph?
Restate your one idea in fresh words rather than copying the introduction. Gather the main points in a sentence, without retelling the evidence. Then close: return to the opening image, say why the idea matters, look ahead, or ask the reader to act. Never add a new idea the piece did not develop.
How do I link one paragraph to the next?
Carry an idea across the join. End one paragraph on an idea, then open the next by picking it up and turning it, as "The danger would shrink" leads to "A safer lane would also be a calmer one". A linking word such as "Furthermore" can signal the link, but it cannot build it alone. Chapter 21 owns the linking words.
Why does each paragraph have only one idea?
So the reader can follow it. When a paragraph holds one idea, the reader knows what every sentence is for. When two ideas share a paragraph, the reader must sort them alone and often misses the second. A new idea deserves its own paragraph, where it can be developed properly.
How do I put the sentences of a paragraph in order?
Choose the order the job needs. A story follows time; a description follows space, such as near to far; an explanation moves from general to specific; a case often builds to its strongest reason. Then check that a reader could say why each sentence comes where it does.
How do I develop a topic sentence?
Answer the reader's question: says what, and how do you know? Add an example that makes the claim concrete, a reason that explains why it is true, or a fact or detail that shows it. A sentence that only repeats the topic sentence in new words has not developed anything.

Keep exploring

▶ Practise paragraph architecture in the interactive lesson
Other guides: NounsVerbsAdjectivesPronounsArticles & DeterminersAdverbsPrepositionsSentence StructurePhrasesClauses & ConjunctionsSentence TypesSubject-Verb AgreementTense ConsistencyPronoun AgreementParallel StructureCommas & SemicolonsApostrophes & QuotesCapitalizationHyphens & DashesConcisenessTransitions & FlowTone & RegisterError SpottingSentence RhythmPunctuation & Editing for EffectFigures of SpeechVoice & StyleArgument & PersuasionPutting It All Together · All 30 chapters
Copyright © Pawan Nayar · LLOS.ai · 2026 — Original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved. This is the readable guide; the interactive lesson lives at paragraph-architecture.html.