← L² Lab
🧠 Critical Thinking
Card 16
🔍 📰 ✅

How do you know if a source is trustworthy?

💭 How to Think About This

You read something online: "Scientists discover chocolate cures cancer!" Should you believe it? WHO said it? WHEN? WHERE was it published? Not all sources are equal - and learning to evaluate them is crucial in our information-overloaded world!

🔒 Start writing to unlock hints

WHO: Author credentials? Expert in this field?

WHAT: Type of source? News, opinion, satire, ad?

WHEN: Recent or outdated?

WHERE: Published where? Reputable outlet?

WHY: Purpose? Inform, persuade, sell, entertain?

TRUSTWORTHY sources typically:

• Cite their sources (footnotes, links, references)

• Have named, qualified authors

• Separate news from opinion clearly

• Correct errors transparently

• Use measured language (not sensational)

• Published by established organizations

BE SKEPTICAL when you see:

• No author listed (or author has no credentials)

• Sensational headlines ("SHOCKING!", "You won't believe...")

• No dates or citations

• Many ads or sponsored content

• URL designed to LOOK like reputable site (ABCnews.com.co)

• Only one source making this claim

DON'T just read the article! LATERAL READING = leave the site and search for: (1) Who is the author? (2) What do other sources say about this claim? (3) What's the original source? Fact-checkers do this constantly!

Evaluating sources means checking WHO said it, WHERE, WHEN, and WHY before believing!

The CRAAP Test:

Currency: Is it up-to-date?

Relevance: Does it answer your question?

Authority: Who's the author? Qualified?

Accuracy: Can you verify it? Sources cited?

Purpose: Inform, persuade, sell, or entertain?

Quick checks:

1. About page: Who runs this site?

2. Contact info: Can you reach them?

3. Other coverage: Do reliable sources report this?

4. Original source: Is this secondhand? Find the original!

5. Reverse image search: For photos - are they real/recent?

Hierarchy of reliability:

MOST reliable: Peer-reviewed research, expert consensus, primary sources

MODERATE: Established news organizations, verified reports

LEAST reliable: Social media posts, unknown websites, viral content

Golden rule: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

🤔 Which thinking lens(es) did you use?

Select all the lenses you used: