The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Align the product feature tiles on the landing artboard to the 12-column grid and distribute the…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Align the product feature tiles on the landing artboard to the 12-column grid and distribute the five image frames evenly across the horizontal centerline. Target the group named Tiles_Features, use pixel-snapped edges, and don’t alter the current visual margins. After aligning, run a quick check at 1280px width to confirm even gutters and save as Landing_Tiles_Aligned.ai.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I hand this layout to the content team, make the alignment obvious and the spacing easy to…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I hand this layout to the content team, make the alignment obvious and the spacing easy to edit. Surface the grid and guides used, show the mathematical spacing between tiles, lock the master alignment group, and flag any tiles that visually read off-center despite numeric alignment. Recommend any small nudges that improve optical balance without changing the column math.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I aligned five product tiles to the column grid and the inspector shows equal spacing, but the art…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Numbers say perfectly centered but it looks off to the designer.
I aligned five product tiles to the column grid and the inspector shows equal spacing, but the art director says it reads off-center. I’m worried nudging will break the responsive behavior the front-end team expects and I don’t know which visual trick to apply. How should I diagnose whether this is an optical illusion from differing content weights, and what minimal adjustment keeps code-friendly spacing while calming the art director?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+We keep losing review time because each designer rechecks alignments by eye and makes tiny manual…
Become — change the pattern
+Re-doing manual alignment for every project release.
We keep losing review time because each designer rechecks alignments by eye and makes tiny manual shifts that front-end then rejects. It wastes two rounds of review per sprint. Are we missing a shared grid spec, a naming convention for locked master groups, or a training gap in optical alignment, and what single habit change or file convention will stop this back-and-forth?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other vector design work people do in Adobe Illustrator.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.