Handoff designs to developers

Handoff designs to developers in Figma — with the four heights of help laid out: do it now, make it easier for the next person to accept, work out the right move when you are stuck, and learn the pattern so it stops coming back.

4prompt heights
Open it in the interactive atlas →

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
Prepare the design package for handoff of the new onboarding flow to Rahul and the frontend team.…
Prepare the design package for handoff of the new onboarding flow to Rahul and the frontend team. Include component usage notes, interaction states, a mapping of which components are custom versus library, and a prioritized list of items that will need engineering decisions. Ask Rahul to sign off on the implementation plan by Tuesday noon.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I hand off onboarding, make it easy for developers to implement: surface the three…
Before I hand off onboarding, make it easy for developers to implement: surface the three components that require custom work up front, make the variant rules and props findable, and flag any animations or micro-interactions that will need engineering sign-off because they rely on timing or nonstandard behaviors.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I just completed the handoff and Rahul's team asked which component controls the onboarding modal…

Handoff landed and developers asked which component controls the modal behavior.

I just completed the handoff and Rahul's team asked which component controls the onboarding modal behavior. They need to know if it is a library component to reuse or a custom one to reimplement. I do not know whether the behavior was prototyped inside a nested variant or a separate overlay. Should I inspect the component hierarchy, send a quick recorded walkthrough, or mark the component as custom and provide the implementation details? What will avoid blocked work overnight?

Become — change the pattern

+
Over multiple handoffs I keep getting follow-up questions about which components are library-owned…

Handoffs repeatedly leave ambiguous component ownership.

Over multiple handoffs I keep getting follow-up questions about which components are library-owned and which are one-off, causing rework and missed deadlines. I want a practice that clarifies ownership at handoff and reduces back-and-forth. What explicit ownership note, file structure convention, and quick verification step should I adopt so developers know what to reuse and what to rebuild?

Next to this one

Other interface design work people do in Figma.

Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.