Manage component variants

Manage component variants in Figma — with the four heights of help laid out: do it now, make it easier for the next person to accept, work out the right move when you are stuck, and learn the pattern so it stops coming back.

4prompt heights
Open it in the interactive atlas →

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
Consolidate the card component into three variants: compact, default, and expanded. Migrate all…
Consolidate the card component into three variants: compact, default, and expanded. Migrate all product list and dashboard instances to the default variant, update overrides for image aspect ratios, and ensure interactions for expand/collapse map to the expanded state. Finish migration by Monday and report any frames that reference a detached master or a renamed variant.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I reorganize card variants, make it easy for PMs and engineers to approve the change. Show a…
Before I reorganize card variants, make it easy for PMs and engineers to approve the change. Show a matrix of where compact versus default currently appears, surface places where local overrides change padding or shadows, and flag any components that rely on the old expanded layout for JS hooks. Call out the complexity cost of every instance that will need manual adjustment.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I merged three card variants into default and compact, and the analytics dashboard now shows…

We merged variants and one dashboard lost its spacing

I merged three card variants into default and compact, and the analytics dashboard now shows collapsed spacing on several rows. I’m not sure if the issue is a padding override or that the instance accidentally switched to compact. What are the likely causes, what quick view should I open to diagnose the problematic instances, and how do I revert only those instances without undoing the whole merge?

Become — change the pattern

+
Over the past six months we keep refactoring component variants and each time it creates new visual…

Variant churn causes repeated visual regressions

Over the past six months we keep refactoring component variants and each time it creates new visual regressions and extra QA cycles. Is the pattern coming from poor naming, insufficient migration checks, or a lack of stable tokens? Recommend a practical convention and one enforcement step we can add to our release checklist so variant churn stops costing us sprints.

Next to this one

Other interface design work people do in Figma.

Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.