The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+Apply a six-month retention policy to the marketing team’s general channel and a two-year retention…
Execute — do the immediate task
+Apply a six-month retention policy to the marketing team’s general channel and a two-year retention to the Legal channel. Confirm the policies are applied to existing messages and files, make sure the policy won’t delete anything the Legal hold flagged, and report back to IT Director Omar Patel and Legal Counsel by Tuesday with verification steps taken.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I change retention rules, make it easy to decide: surface which channels and users will be…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I change retention rules, make it easy to decide: surface which channels and users will be affected, list content types exempted by legal holds, estimate total storage impact, and flag any channels where applying a shorter retention would delete evidence held for active disputes. Give me a clear yes/no risk flag for Legal review.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I’m being asked to shorten retention on most team channels to six months to save storage, but Legal…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I need to shorten retention but Legal may object
I’m being asked to shorten retention on most team channels to six months to save storage, but Legal warns this could conflict with two open disputes. I don’t know which channels contain relevant threads and I can’t ask Legal to comb everything. What’s the most likely safe approach to proceed now and the minimal information I should get from Legal to avoid destroying required evidence?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+We repeatedly lose credibility because retention changes either keep everything forever or delete…
Become — change the pattern
+Retention settings cause repeated conflicts with Legal and teams
We repeatedly lose credibility because retention changes either keep everything forever or delete evidence that Legal later needs. What habit and governance change should I introduce so retention policy changes are predictable, include Legal earlier, and avoid emergency restores?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other collaboration work people do in Microsoft Teams.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.