The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+We need a product spec for the public API for search. Draft a spec that covers the purpose, user…
Execute — do the immediate task
+We need a product spec for the public API for search. Draft a spec that covers the purpose, user scenarios, success metrics, rate limits, authentication method, error codes, and backward-compatibility policy. Put the product manager's summary at the top, list API endpoints with request/response examples, and include a rollout checklist for engineering and support. Have it ready for the March 15 stakeholder review.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before the stakeholder review, make the spec easier to approve: surface the primary user scenario…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before the stakeholder review, make the spec easier to approve: surface the primary user scenario and success metric at the top, make pricing and rate-limit implications findable, and flag any choices that would make legal or security teams hesitate. Call out any assumptions that change scope or schedule.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Legal just flagged our chosen token-based auth as inadequate two hours before the March 15 review.…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Legal flagged authentication as inadequate the morning before review.
Legal just flagged our chosen token-based auth as inadequate two hours before the March 15 review. I cannot reach the security lead. What is the likely impact on the spec, what urgent evidence or fallback should I prepare to keep the review useful, and which quick wording changes could buy time without committing us to a final solution?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Over several releases we keep discovering missing edge-case requirements late in development, which…
Become — change the pattern
+We repeatedly miss edge-case requirements until late in build.
Over several releases we keep discovering missing edge-case requirements late in development, which causes last-minute scope creep and trust loss with engineering. Where does the process break down, and recommend one concrete change to how we gather and validate requirements so we catch those edge cases earlier.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Next to this one
Other docs and databases work people do in Notion.
Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.