The four heights
The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need to complete faculty performance evaluations for five instructors this quarter. For each,…
Execute — do the immediate task
+I need to complete faculty performance evaluations for five instructors this quarter. For each, write a one-page evaluation noting teaching effectiveness with two examples, research progress with metrics, service contributions, one developmental goal, and a recommended rating. Send each draft to the faculty member and copy HR by next Wednesday.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I send these evaluation drafts to faculty, make them easier for recipients to act on. Put…
Improve — make it easier to accept
+Before I send these evaluation drafts to faculty, make them easier for recipients to act on. Put the recommended rating and the single recommended development goal on page one, follow with two evidence-backed examples each for teaching and research, and flag any wording that could be interpreted as legally vulnerable or demoralizing.
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+I just had two faculty respond angrily to the last cycle's evaluations, and now I'm prepping five…
Decide — diagnose the stuck moment
+Two faculty reacted angrily to previous evaluations.
I just had two faculty respond angrily to the last cycle's evaluations, and now I'm prepping five more. I am the department chair, the faculty report to me, and HR watches for grievances. I am afraid the wording will trigger defensiveness and formal complaints; I cannot tell which phrasing calms people and which provokes them. What is the likely diagnosis and the best next move?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Become — change the pattern
+Every review cycle I spend days revising evaluations after pushback or HR queries, which eats into…
Become — change the pattern
+Rewriting evaluations after disputes and HR queries every cycle.
Every review cycle I spend days revising evaluations after pushback or HR queries, which eats into my semester and undermines credibility. I want a durable habit or structure so evaluations are accurate, defensible, and accepted first pass. What template, communication ritual, or expectation-setting change will reduce disputes and save time?
Pasted it? When the reply comes back, push once: ask it to sharpen the weakest part. — Did this prompt help?
Where the evidence lives
Who was seen doing this, and what people really ask.
Fashion MerchandiserLinguistics ProfessorMath Curriculum DeveloperMath TeacherProfessorBook Revieweralso: Conduct staff performance evaluations.
Software tasks in the LLOS Work Atlas come from evidence, never a feature list: careers attested to do the work, real job descriptions, and the questions people actually ask (with their view counts). Facets — feature, workflow, troubleshoot, administer, deploy, scale — are open metadata: the work decides, not a taxonomy.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.
The rest of the map
Same library, five ways in.