Link cards together

Link cards together in Trello — with the four heights of help laid out: do it now, make it easier for the next person to accept, work out the right move when you are stuck, and learn the pattern so it stops coming back.

4prompt heights
Open it in the interactive atlas →

The four heights

The same task, four distances: today's deadline, the next reviewer, the stuck moment, the pattern.

Execute — do the immediate task

+
Link these two cards so anyone on the project can navigate between the feature request and the…
Link these two cards so anyone on the project can navigate between the feature request and the related bug: 'Mobile nav redesign' and 'iOS nav overlap bug'. Add the link on both cards and write a one-line comment on each explaining the relationship and the current action owner. Set the relationship label to 'blocks' from the bug to the feature.

Improve — make it easier to accept

+
Before I link this feature card to three related bug cards, make the connection clear for a…
Before I link this feature card to three related bug cards, make the connection clear for a reviewer: show which card is blocking which, surface the evidence (screenshots or steps to reproduce) on the blocking card, and add a short note on how fix order affects release. Suggest precise wording for the link comment so a PM can triage quickly.

Decide — diagnose the stuck moment

+
I just linked 'Mobile nav redesign' to 'iOS nav overlap bug' but developers think the feature work…

I connected a feature card to a bug card and the team is confused who fixes what

I just linked 'Mobile nav redesign' to 'iOS nav overlap bug' but developers think the feature work owns the fix and QA thinks the bug owner should. Given that both Alex (feature lead) and Priya (bug owner) are listed, how should ownership and next steps be assigned to avoid finger-pointing?

Become — change the pattern

+
Across projects we create links without consistent verbs or context, and people misread them at…

We keep making ambiguous card links that confuse ownership

Across projects we create links without consistent verbs or context, and people misread them at standups. What naming convention and brief linking ritual can the team adopt so every link instantly shows who owns the next action and whether it blocks a release? Propose one clear rule and an example.

Next to this one

Other kanban boards work people do in Trello.

Every task here came from the work, not from a feature list — which is why the prompts name what you want done and never the button that does it. The tool changes; the work does not.
Copyright © LLOS.ai · 2026 — original pedagogy, voice, and design — all rights reserved.

The rest of the map

Same library, five ways in.