Are there situations where passive voice is better?
General knowledgeAsked by Anonymous22 Oct 2026, 11:28 PM ISTUpdated
In one line
Sometimes, passive voice is better when we care more about the action than who did it.
The rule
Passive voice is used when the focus is on the action or the receiver of the action, not the doer.
Let's understand it simply
Imagine your mother’s favourite vase broke. If you say, "The vase was broken," you are using passive voice. You are not saying who broke it. Sometimes, we do this when we don’t know who did it, or when who did it is not important. It’s like talking about the result, not the person.
Active vs Passive Voice
Active Voice
Passive Voice
Focus
Who does the action
The action or receiver
Example
Ravi broke the vase.
The vase was broken (by Ravi).
Use
Everyday talk, stories
News, science, when doer is unknown
How it works
The object of the active sentence becomes the subject in passive.
The verb changes to a form of "be" + past participle (like "was broken").
The doer (if needed) is added at the end with "by" (like "by Ravi").
Sometimes, the doer is left out if not important or not known.
The story behind it
English has both active and passive forms for a long time. Writers and speakers noticed that sometimes, it’s better to talk about what happened, not who did it. This helps in formal writing, news, and science, where the action matters more than the person.
Where you see it in real life
News reports: "A new law was passed yesterday." (Who passed it is less important than the law itself.)
Science experiments: "The solution was heated to 80°C." (Focus is on the process, not the scientist.)
Instructions: "The rice should be washed before cooking." (The person is anyone following the steps.)
Official notices: "Applications are invited for the post of clerk." (Anyone can apply; the focus is on the action.)
When the doer is unknown: "My cycle was stolen." (You don’t know who did it.)
Why it matters
Used in formal writing, like reports and scientific papers.
Helps when the doer is unknown or not important.
Makes sentences sound more polite or less direct.
Needed for some exam questions and letter writing formats.
Common mistakes
Thinking passive is always wrong — it is useful in the right place.
Forgetting to change the verb correctly ("is eat" instead of "is eaten").
Using passive when the doer is important ("Sachin hit the century" is better than "The century was hit by Sachin" in cricket news).
Remember it
Use passive voice when the action or result is more important than who did it.
Check yourself
Why do science books often use passive voice?
Because the process or result is more important than who did it.
Change this to passive: 'The chef cooked the biryani.'
The biryani was cooked by the chef.
When should you avoid passive voice?
When the doer is important or you want to be direct.
Quick recap
Passive voice highlights the action, not the doer.
It is common in news, science, and formal writing.
Use passive when the doer is unknown or unimportant.