General knowledgeAsked by Anonymous23 Oct 2026, 1:26 PM ISTUpdated
In one line
Passive voice is not always wrong, but sometimes it makes sentences confusing or unclear.
The rule
Passive voice is when the subject of the sentence receives the action, instead of doing it.
For example, "The ball was kicked by Rahul" (passive) instead of "Rahul kicked the ball" (active).
Let's understand it simply
Imagine you are playing cricket. If you say, "The ball was caught," we don't know who caught it. But if you say, "Amit caught the ball," it is clear. Passive voice hides who did the action. Sometimes that's okay, but often it makes things confusing.
Active vs Passive Voice
Active Voice
Passive Voice
Who does the action?
Rahul kicked the ball.
The ball was kicked by Rahul.
Focus on
Doer (Rahul)
Receiver (the ball)
Clarity
Clear
Sometimes unclear
How it works
In passive voice, the object becomes the subject.
The verb changes to a form like "was eaten," "is made," or "will be done."
The doer (person who did the action) is sometimes left out or added at the end with "by."
If the doer is important, leaving it out can make the meaning unclear.
The story behind it
Passive voice has been used in English for hundreds of years. It was never "banned," but teachers and writers noticed that too much passive voice makes writing dull or confusing. Famous writers like George Orwell advised using active voice unless passive is needed.
Where you see it in real life
News headlines: "A new bridge was built" (Who built it? Not clear)
Science experiments: "The solution was heated" (Focus is on the process, not the person)
Cricket commentary: "The ball was bowled" (Who bowled it? Not clear)
School reports: "Homework was not submitted" (Who didn't submit? Not clear)
Why it matters
In exams, using passive voice wrongly can make your answers unclear.
In job applications or essays, active voice is usually better because it is direct.
In instructions or rules, passive voice can hide who is responsible.
Some sentences must be active to show who did what, especially in stories or reports.
Common mistakes
Thinking passive voice is always wrong: It is not. Sometimes it is useful.
Using passive voice when the doer is important: This makes the sentence confusing.
Overusing passive voice: Makes writing boring and unclear.
Remember it
Use passive voice only when the doer is not important or not known. Otherwise, use active voice for clarity.
Check yourself
Why can passive voice be a problem in writing?
It can hide who did the action, making the meaning unclear.
Change this to active voice: 'The roti was eaten by Sita.'
Sita ate the roti.
Is passive voice always wrong? Why or why not?
No, it is not always wrong. It is useful when the doer is unknown or unimportant.
Quick recap
Passive voice is not always wrong, but can be unclear.
Use passive only when the doer is unknown or unimportant.
Active voice is clearer and better for most writing.